GW OCI 2012 Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:37 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.

I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.
Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way... e-mail seems to be less frequent.

I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
No, going to a permanent address since I moved over the summer.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:41 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.

I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.
Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way... e-mail seems to be less frequent.

I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
I received a CB invitation through email and I thought you generally received those via phone. You just never know.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Aug 22, 2012 8:59 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.

I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.
Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way.. . e-mail seems to be less frequent.

I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
I received a CB invitation through email and I thought you generally received those via phone. You just never know.

I know Willkie have out email CBs

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:06 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.

I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.
Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way... e-mail seems to be less frequent.

I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
No, going to a permanent address since I moved over the summer.
Welp, I guess you've just been interviewing at firms who are slower / more formalized in the process of handing out callbacks. I've gotten some invitations weeks after i screened so it happens

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:42 am

Anyone hear back from Jones Day (NY)?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:22 am

How many CB's is enough to feel comfortable/safe?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:16 am

Anonymous User wrote:How many CB's is enough to feel comfortable/safe?
They said at orientation the prospects of an offer from a callback is about 50/50...

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:18 am

Let's be real. We're law students...are we ever going to get enough CBs to feel comfortable? :lol:

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:24 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:How many CB's is enough to feel comfortable/safe?
They said at orientation the prospects of an offer from a callback is about 50/50...
Crap, that means an offer is never guaranteed.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:32 am

Anybody heard from Cooley (non-IP schedule)?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:37 am

Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:40 am

Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect
If GW is at the bottom of the OCI barrell, where in the barrel are GMU, AUWCL, UNC, Fordham...

I would suspect GW is near the middle of the barrel.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:41 am

Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect

I batted around 0.500 in the 2010 OCI, which was pretty brutal.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:47 am

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect

I batted 0.500 in the 2010 OCI, which was pretty brutal.
Stats? Number of callbacks?

I don't know 50/50 just seems a bit too optimistic for me. I think realistically with 4 CBs you will probably just have 1 offer. 2 if you are a great interviewer. 6-8 callbacks will likely yield 2-3 offers. More like 25%-33% of CBs yield offers IMO.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 12:04 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect

I batted 0.500 in the 2010 OCI, which was pretty brutal.
Stats? Number of callbacks?

I don't know 50/50 just seems a bit too optimistic for me. I think realistically with 4 CBs you will probably just have 1 offer. 2 if you are a great interviewer. 6-8 callbacks will likely yield 2-3 offers. More like 25%-33% of CBs yield offers IMO.
I was an IP transfer from a shit school with decent grades, but nothing crazy. I went 4/10 on offers/CBs.

I think that, in the aggregate, the 50% number isn't that far-fetched. It seems to be representative of the entire interviewing cohort because stronger candidates will often net a higher CB:offer ratios (I know of some from the top of my class that pulled naerly 100% CB:offer ratios with TONS of CBs), whereas the rest of the candidates scatter around the curve (e.g. someone with 1 CB will either go 100% or 0%, and, as the previous anon said, many will land around 25-35%).

ETA: for those doing 3LOLOCI for IP, I bid (to cover my bases, and never ended up interviewing) last year and still got a bunch of screeners. Thus, there is STILL HOAP if you're left at the end of 2L summer with no offers.

GL everyone!

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:16 pm

Any CBs from:

Finnegan, Kenyon, Kilpatrick, Bryan Cave, Morgan Lewis, Sterne Kessler, or Goodwin Procter?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:21 pm

Nothing from Bryan Cave on my end. If anyone has heard back from Bryan Cave, was your interviewer initials (GM)

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:29 pm

Bryan Cave has given out CBs.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:41 pm

Bracewell?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:59 pm

Anyone hear from Frommer?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:17 pm

Any word on Alston Bird or Jones Day (New York)?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:54 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Anyone hear back from Jones Day (NY)?
Made CBs starting Tuesday.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:14 pm

Simpson Thatcher callback. Weil too.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:27 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Simpson Thatcher callback. Weil too.
Weil IP?

Anonymous User
Posts: 428481
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: GW OCI 2012

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:28 pm

Dechert CB today

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”