No, going to a permanent address since I moved over the summer.Anonymous User wrote:Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way... e-mail seems to be less frequent.Anonymous User wrote:Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.
I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
GW OCI 2012 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
I received a CB invitation through email and I thought you generally received those via phone. You just never know.Anonymous User wrote:Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way... e-mail seems to be less frequent.Anonymous User wrote:Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.
I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Anonymous User wrote:I received a CB invitation through email and I thought you generally received those via phone. You just never know.Anonymous User wrote:Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way.. . e-mail seems to be less frequent.Anonymous User wrote:Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.
I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
I know Willkie have out email CBs
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Welp, I guess you've just been interviewing at firms who are slower / more formalized in the process of handing out callbacks. I've gotten some invitations weeks after i screened so it happensAnonymous User wrote:No, going to a permanent address since I moved over the summer.Anonymous User wrote:Do you two have your snail mail coming to D.C.? Many firms send dings that way... e-mail seems to be less frequent.Anonymous User wrote:Hah, SAME. I just did that. Just logged on to make sure all my stuff was straight and good to go. Freaking dead silence from over 10 places.Anonymous User wrote:I haven't heard anything from anybody. What is the deal with that? No CB and no dings.
I even checked my resume to see if my contact info was correct.
I've even gotten callback invitations through the mail (Ropes... those clowns), so they might not even all be bad.
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Anyone hear back from Jones Day (NY)?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
How many CB's is enough to feel comfortable/safe?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
They said at orientation the prospects of an offer from a callback is about 50/50...Anonymous User wrote:How many CB's is enough to feel comfortable/safe?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Let's be real. We're law students...are we ever going to get enough CBs to feel comfortable?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Crap, that means an offer is never guaranteed.Anonymous User wrote:They said at orientation the prospects of an offer from a callback is about 50/50...Anonymous User wrote:How many CB's is enough to feel comfortable/safe?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Anybody heard from Cooley (non-IP schedule)?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
If GW is at the bottom of the OCI barrell, where in the barrel are GMU, AUWCL, UNC, Fordham...Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect
I would suspect GW is near the middle of the barrel.
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect
I batted around 0.500 in the 2010 OCI, which was pretty brutal.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Stats? Number of callbacks?Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect
I batted 0.500 in the 2010 OCI, which was pretty brutal.
I don't know 50/50 just seems a bit too optimistic for me. I think realistically with 4 CBs you will probably just have 1 offer. 2 if you are a great interviewer. 6-8 callbacks will likely yield 2-3 offers. More like 25%-33% of CBs yield offers IMO.
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
I was an IP transfer from a shit school with decent grades, but nothing crazy. I went 4/10 on offers/CBs.Anonymous User wrote:Stats? Number of callbacks?Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Unfortunately, the 50 percent number is for all law schools. I imagine GW is near the bottom of the OCI barrel. I bet it is lower for us, but that is too helpful a number for CD... to collect
I batted 0.500 in the 2010 OCI, which was pretty brutal.
I don't know 50/50 just seems a bit too optimistic for me. I think realistically with 4 CBs you will probably just have 1 offer. 2 if you are a great interviewer. 6-8 callbacks will likely yield 2-3 offers. More like 25%-33% of CBs yield offers IMO.
I think that, in the aggregate, the 50% number isn't that far-fetched. It seems to be representative of the entire interviewing cohort because stronger candidates will often net a higher CB:offer ratios (I know of some from the top of my class that pulled naerly 100% CB:offer ratios with TONS of CBs), whereas the rest of the candidates scatter around the curve (e.g. someone with 1 CB will either go 100% or 0%, and, as the previous anon said, many will land around 25-35%).
ETA: for those doing 3LOLOCI for IP, I bid (to cover my bases, and never ended up interviewing) last year and still got a bunch of screeners. Thus, there is STILL HOAP if you're left at the end of 2L summer with no offers.
GL everyone!
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Any CBs from:
Finnegan, Kenyon, Kilpatrick, Bryan Cave, Morgan Lewis, Sterne Kessler, or Goodwin Procter?
Finnegan, Kenyon, Kilpatrick, Bryan Cave, Morgan Lewis, Sterne Kessler, or Goodwin Procter?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Nothing from Bryan Cave on my end. If anyone has heard back from Bryan Cave, was your interviewer initials (GM)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Bryan Cave has given out CBs.
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Anyone hear from Frommer?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Any word on Alston Bird or Jones Day (New York)?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Made CBs starting Tuesday.Anonymous User wrote:Anyone hear back from Jones Day (NY)?
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Simpson Thatcher callback. Weil too.
-
- Posts: 428481
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: GW OCI 2012
Weil IP?Anonymous User wrote:Simpson Thatcher callback. Weil too.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login