2013 Vault Rankings Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- GeePee
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:35 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Why does it seem like the firms that are doing very well right now are moving down? These rankings are such nonsense.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Kirkland's MARKET SHATTERING BONUSES lead to cemented V10 status. Sorry S&C bros for your prestige hit. Looking forward though for anon posts from Skadden SAs referencing their V3 firm.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Glad you asked this question anon so no one would know you're gunning for DAT BEST QOL, BROTHER.Anonymous User wrote:So what the Best Firm to work for 2013?
Anyone have a Gold subscription or access?
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
So what the Frattiest Firm to work for 2013?
Anyone have a Gold subscription or access?
Anyone have a Gold subscription or access?
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
How the hell is Latham a V10 again?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Detrox
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:58 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Because the people who rank firms for this stuff are not the ones who got LATTTHAMED.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:How the hell is Latham a V10 again?
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
See above:Anonymous User wrote:So what the Frattiest Firm to work for 2013?
Anyone have a Gold subscription or access?
Big Shrimpin wrote:Na. Alpha Mofo litigators just DOMINATING the LES bar scene.Blindmelon wrote:Beta bros at MoFo are literally getting laughed at by alpha Shearman associates who spend their extra prestige points on bottle service and blow.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
ALPHA as FUCK MoFo SF litigator bros will be STYLING on dem orrick bros all weekend and unequivocally CRUSHING the bar scene all up in union square and the marina, no doubt.Big Shrimpin wrote:Na. Alpha Mofo litigators just DOMINATING the LES bar scene.Blindmelon wrote:Beta bros at MoFo are literally getting laughed at by alpha Shearman associates who spend their extra prestige points on bottle service and blow.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
God it's so hot when TLS speaks XO.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Right around post #1 did we get the hint that vault rankings don't matter. Almost every post thereafter reeks of self-conscious circle-jerking.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Anon abuse ITT gets week bans from here on out.
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:27 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
W&C and MTO are probably the two best firms to work for in the V100. These ranking are a joke.
-
- Posts: 428535
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
If after all bankruptcy matters, they still gave Dewey a good ranking, I really doubt how financially viable and solvent other firms in top 25 list are...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:56 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Ban his ass BK!Anonymous User wrote:If after all bankruptcy matters, they still gave Dewey a good ranking, I really doubt how financially viable and solvent other firms in top 25 list are...
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
A better way to look at the Vault rankings is geographically then alphabetically.
Here are the Vault 25:
New York:
Boies Schiller
Cleary
Cravath
Davis Polk
Debevoise
Paul Weiss
Skadden
Simpson
Shearman
Sullivan
Wachtell
Weil
White & Case
Washington, DC:
Arnold & Porter
Covington
Williams & Connolly
Wilmer Hale
Jones Day
Chicago:
Kirkland & Ellis
Sidley Austin
San Francisco:
Morrison & Foerster
Los Angeles:
Gibson Dunn
Latham
O'Melveny & Myers
Quinn Emmanuel
Boston:
Ropes & Gray
Aside from Boies, which is probably too boutique-y to be on the list (like Susman or Munger), Jones Day (which doesn't have a home market), and the egregious White & Case trolling, this seems like a pretty good listing of the top few very large firms in each of the top several markets.
Here are the Vault 25:
New York:
Cleary
Cravath
Davis Polk
Debevoise
Paul Weiss
Skadden
Simpson
Shearman
Sullivan
Wachtell
Weil
Washington, DC:
Arnold & Porter
Covington
Williams & Connolly
Wilmer Hale
Chicago:
Kirkland & Ellis
Sidley Austin
San Francisco:
Morrison & Foerster
Los Angeles:
Gibson Dunn
Latham
O'Melveny & Myers
Quinn Emmanuel
Boston:
Ropes & Gray
Aside from Boies, which is probably too boutique-y to be on the list (like Susman or Munger), Jones Day (which doesn't have a home market), and the egregious White & Case trolling, this seems like a pretty good listing of the top few very large firms in each of the top several markets.
Last edited by rayiner on Tue Jun 19, 2012 8:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 12:24 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
White & Case trolling? Are they that overranked?
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I've bore witness to the styling, especially in the Marina. Fratty as FUARK.Anonymous User wrote:ALPHA as FUCK MoFo SF litigator bros will be STYLING on dem orrick bros all weekend and unequivocally CRUSHING the bar scene all up in union square and the marina, no doubt.Big Shrimpin wrote:Na. Alpha Mofo litigators just DOMINATING the LES bar scene.Blindmelon wrote:Beta bros at MoFo are literally getting laughed at by alpha Shearman associates who spend their extra prestige points on bottle service and blow.
Lol rankings.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TaipeiMort
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:51 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
http://politicker.com/2012/06/harry-rei ... stion-bro/clownquestionbro wrote:Me too.heeloftar wrote:I really, really, hope that quote sticks aroundReinschmicker wrote:That's a clown question, bro.PennBull wrote:What functional purpose does the Vault rankings have for us?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 1:06 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
GloriousTaipeiMort wrote:http://politicker.com/2012/06/harry-rei ... stion-bro/Reinschmicker wrote:That's a clown question, bro.PennBull wrote:What functional purpose does the Vault rankings have for us?
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
From 45-39. It seems Vault may ENJOY DLA a little more than its associates do.
- Blindmelon
- Posts: 1708
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Egregious anti-WilmerHale trolling.rayiner wrote:
Boston:
Ropes & Gray
Aside from Boies, which is probably too boutique-y to be on the list (like Susman or Munger), Jones Day (which doesn't have a home market), and the egregious White & Case trolling, this seems like a pretty good listing of the top few very large firms in each of the top several markets.
Anyone looking to work in Boston should seriously ignore Vault. WilmerHale (21)/Ropes (25) are pretty much equal with each being better at one thing or another; then Goodwin (in the 40s?) is a slight step behind; then Mintz (90s?)/Choate/foley hoag, etc with Choate/Foley not even on the Vault list, yet are extremely strong Boston firms.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3019
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
With the revenue that Cahill brings in, and the excellent bonuses they give, why exactly do they fall in the rankings to below 50?
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I didn't double-list firms that had multiple home bases. So Latham is listed in its original LA office instead of in NY. I listed Wilmer Hale in DC because Wilmer Cutler was bigger than Hale & Dorr and I tend to think of the combined entity as a "DC firm."Blindmelon wrote:Egregious anti-WilmerHale trolling.rayiner wrote:
Boston:
Ropes & Gray
Aside from Boies, which is probably too boutique-y to be on the list (like Susman or Munger), Jones Day (which doesn't have a home market), and the egregious White & Case trolling, this seems like a pretty good listing of the top few very large firms in each of the top several markets.
But the Wilmer Hale example strengthens my point. Before the merger, Wilmer Cutler and Hale & Dorr were both in the V25. As you say, Ropes & Gray and Hale & Dorr were peers at the top of the Boston market.
The V25 does a pretty good job identifying firms like Ropes & Gray and Hale & Dorr that are the top couple in the major markets. The randomness of the specific ordering within the V25 really has more to do with how little sense it makes to order firms in different major markets relative to each other.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Why aren't the USNWR rankings a ranking of placement power? Methodology that doesn't reflect our priorities, obvs.kaiser wrote:With the revenue that Cahill brings in, and the excellent bonuses they give, why exactly do they fall in the rankings to below 50?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login