But how else will this thread reach 15+ pages?Fresh Prince wrote:This really isn't the place for metaphysical debates about what prestige is.
2013 Vault Rankings Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I'm curious what your personal "FP10" would be. Mirror Vault more or less? Toss in Williams & Connolly, etc.? (Actually curious.)Fresh Prince wrote:#3 sounds like you're regurgitating the TLS group think: just because it's a boutique, it must be good. MoloLamken? Really? Are you just name dropping small firms at this point? This is absolutely comical. I have half a mind to say you probably don't know what half these firms specialize in, but you'll probably go to chambers and regurgitate that as if you knew it all along.Anonymous User wrote:This thread is dumb.
(1) Not quite sure why there is so much talk about Susman/Keker when discussing biglaw... Save those for the lit boutique discussions.
(2) Also the comment about W&C for white collar versus Susman for commercial lit is ill-informed. W&C does far, far more commercial lit than white collar (FYI - white collar virtually never comes close to trial). If you want big white collar investigations, look to Covington, Wilmer, etc.
(3) If you're going to get into a lit boutique discussion, it's way more complicated than the 1L's and 2L's posting here make it look. Off the top of my head, you should be discussing, inter alia: Kellogg Huber; Robbins Russell; Zuckerman Spaeder; MoloLamken; Morvillo; Keker; Bartlitt Beck; Yetter Coleman; etc.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I am literally mystified by people I know who took SA jobs at Cravath and are working until 10 pm, working regular weekends, etc. just as summers. I don't know what the Cravath name gets you but it can't be worth it.Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I'm not going to go that far. If you're deciding between market paying firms in NYC, then go with Cravath or whatever.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
This thread is shockingly bad.Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
-
- Posts: 428486
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I don't think anyone's going to question that the name of a law firm gets you something of value. The point is that trying to rank-order what that value is for firms at this level, without knowing the priorities of a prospective associate, isn't going to get you anywhere useful.dixiecupdrinking wrote:I am literally mystified by people I know who took SA jobs at Cravath and are working until 10 pm, working regular weekends, etc. just as summers. I don't know what the Cravath name gets you but it can't be worth it.Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Yes. I mean versus a DPW, for example. Maybe it's wide-eyed 2L naivete to think there's any difference in quality of life at any of these firms, but it certainly seems like there is a real distinction from the little I know.Anonymous User wrote:I don't think anyone's going to question that the name of a law firm gets you something of value. The point is that trying to rank-order what that value is for firms at this level, without knowing the priorities of a prospective associate, isn't going to get you anywhere useful.dixiecupdrinking wrote:I am literally mystified by people I know who took SA jobs at Cravath and are working until 10 pm, working regular weekends, etc. just as summers. I don't know what the Cravath name gets you but it can't be worth it.Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
-
- Posts: 428486
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Wow, I forgot how convincing ad hominem attacks are...Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:07 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I haven't heard anything to suggest that quality of life as a junior associate is much better at one non-Wachtell v5 than another, but it's definitely true that Cravath is an outlier in putting their SAs through the wringer way harder than just about any other firm out there.dixiecupdrinking wrote:Yes. I mean versus a DPW, for example. Maybe it's wide-eyed 2L naivete to think there's any difference in quality of life at any of these firms, but it certainly seems like there is a real distinction from the little I know.Anonymous User wrote:I don't think anyone's going to question that the name of a law firm gets you something of value. The point is that trying to rank-order what that value is for firms at this level, without knowing the priorities of a prospective associate, isn't going to get you anywhere useful.dixiecupdrinking wrote: I am literally mystified by people I know who took SA jobs at Cravath and are working until 10 pm, working regular weekends, etc. just as summers. I don't know what the Cravath name gets you but it can't be worth it.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
I'm not shocked.rayiner wrote:This thread is shockingly bad.Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:50 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
lol my prestige rankings were just for fun. You guys take yourselves too seriously. And btw, not all of us are law students or 0Ls.
-
- Posts: 5923
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 9:10 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
+1rad lulz wrote:I'm not shocked.rayiner wrote:This thread is shockingly bad.Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know. It'll probably be just as retarded as every other list in this thread. My only larger point is that prestige won't pay the bills.
And that name dropping and using "inter alia" in posts makes you look like a tool at best and a virgin at worst.
Honestly, aside from the rankings if your school gives access to the Vault content (the full firm profiles), it actually has pretty decent information. Similar to Chambers Associate though not as well organized or written.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 1:27 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
no your the idiot for thinking that just because there are more associates in NY and they think NY firms are prestigious that it somehow makes them the most prestigiousFresh Prince wrote:No point in arguing with magnificent. He's so stupid you're wondering whether he's trolling.
Vault rankings measure prestige and they're good at what they do. They don't measure firm health, they don't measure compensation, they don't measure which firms have the bests active groups.
Complaining that Vault rankings focus on NYC M&A is useless. If that's what people think is prestigious, then it is prestigious.
This really isn't the place for metaphysical debates about what prestige is.
go to YLS and ask them whats the most prestigious firm in the country.....I'll tell you this.....it won't be any of the NYC M&A firms
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Arguing subjective impressions as if they are objective facts is kinda retarded, so, you're both right?Magnificent wrote:no your the idiot for thinking that just because there are more associates in NY and they think NY firms are prestigious that it somehow makes them the most prestigiousFresh Prince wrote:No point in arguing with magnificent. He's so stupid you're wondering whether he's trolling.
Vault rankings measure prestige and they're good at what they do. They don't measure firm health, they don't measure compensation, they don't measure which firms have the bests active groups.
Complaining that Vault rankings focus on NYC M&A is useless. If that's what people think is prestigious, then it is prestigious.
This really isn't the place for metaphysical debates about what prestige is.
go to YLS and ask them whats the most prestigious firm in the country.....I'll tell you this.....it won't be any of the NYC M&A firms
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Like I said above: I really don't care for prestige.Magnificent wrote:no your the idiot for thinking that just because there are more associates in NY and they think NY firms are prestigious that it somehow makes them the most prestigiousFresh Prince wrote:No point in arguing with magnificent. He's so stupid you're wondering whether he's trolling.
Vault rankings measure prestige and they're good at what they do. They don't measure firm health, they don't measure compensation, they don't measure which firms have the bests active groups.
Complaining that Vault rankings focus on NYC M&A is useless. If that's what people think is prestigious, then it is prestigious.
This really isn't the place for metaphysical debates about what prestige is.
go to YLS and ask them whats the most prestigious firm in the country.....I'll tell you this.....it won't be any of the NYC M&A firms
-
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:45 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
heh... "your the idiot"Magnificent wrote:no your the idiot for thinking that just because there are more associates in NY and they think NY firms are prestigious that it somehow makes them the most prestigiousFresh Prince wrote:No point in arguing with magnificent. He's so stupid you're wondering whether he's trolling.
Vault rankings measure prestige and they're good at what they do. They don't measure firm health, they don't measure compensation, they don't measure which firms have the bests active groups.
Complaining that Vault rankings focus on NYC M&A is useless. If that's what people think is prestigious, then it is prestigious.
This really isn't the place for metaphysical debates about what prestige is.
go to YLS and ask them whats the most prestigious firm in the country.....I'll tell you this.....it won't be any of the NYC M&A firms
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Detrox
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:58 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
The "prestigious" people at YLS aren't going to firms...Magnificent wrote:no your the idiot for thinking that just because there are more associates in NY and they think NY firms are prestigious that it somehow makes them the most prestigiousFresh Prince wrote:No point in arguing with magnificent. He's so stupid you're wondering whether he's trolling.
Vault rankings measure prestige and they're good at what they do. They don't measure firm health, they don't measure compensation, they don't measure which firms have the bests active groups.
Complaining that Vault rankings focus on NYC M&A is useless. If that's what people think is prestigious, then it is prestigious.
This really isn't the place for metaphysical debates about what prestige is.
go to YLS and ask them whats the most prestigious firm in the country.....I'll tell you this.....it won't be any of the NYC M&A firms
-
- Posts: 428486
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
The only prestige that matters to me: My $200k-in-debt ass is going to be able to pay off my student loans with the MARKET SHATTERING BONUS and dat relatively-reasonable-COL that comes with being Kirkland-Chicago secure.
The only rankings that matter are the models & bottle (AKA "glorious, glorious $0 net worth) rankings:
Wachtell #1
Boise #2
Bartlit (why is everyone leaving them out?)/Keker/Susman tied for #3
K&E-Chicago #4
The only rankings that matter are the models & bottle (AKA "glorious, glorious $0 net worth) rankings:
Wachtell #1
Boise #2
Bartlit (why is everyone leaving them out?)/Keker/Susman tied for #3
K&E-Chicago #4
-
- Posts: 428486
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
oops, double-posted.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 12:50 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Detrox wrote:Magnificent wrote:no your the idiot for thinking that just because there are more associates in NY and they think NY firms are prestigious that it somehow makes them the most prestigiousFresh Prince wrote:No point in arguing with magnificent. He's so stupid you're wondering whether he's trolling.
Vault rankings measure prestige and they're good at what they do. They don't measure firm health, they don't measure compensation, they don't measure which firms have the bests active groups.
Complaining that Vault rankings focus on NYC M&A is useless. If that's what people think is prestigious, then it is prestigious.
This really isn't the place for metaphysical debates about what prestige is.
go to YLS and ask them whats the most prestigious firm in the country.....I'll tell you this.....it won't be any of the NYC M&A firms
The "prestigious" people at YLS aren't going to firms...
YLS loves Wachtell and Cravath. And even the ones gunning for scotus universally try to work for Wachtell/Cravath/W&C for a summer as a resume booster.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428486
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Pretty sure S&C was the most popular firm this year among YLSers, actually, but yeah the point still stands. On the other hand, a lot of YLS people who go the firm route also seem to be splitting summers with highly selective public interest organizations and boutiques.TheProsecutor wrote:YLS loves Wachtell and Cravath. And even the ones gunning for scotus universally try to work for Wachtell/Cravath/W&C for a summer as a resume booster.Detrox wrote:
The "prestigious" people at YLS aren't going to firms...
- Detrox
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:58 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
My point was less that no one at YLS goes to firms or that even the future SCOTUS clerks weren't going, it was that prestige of law firms is not exactly their concern. No potential SCOTUS clerk/AUSA/Prof candidate is going to have trouble in their career goals because they went to a V25 instead of Wachtell/W&C/lit boutique etc.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
So when does Vault publicly release the specialty/geographic rankings? That stuff I find kind of interesting.
- Detrox
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:58 pm
Re: 2013 Vault Rankings
Everything's out. You just need gold membership. Log in through OCS on the nyu site.dixiecupdrinking wrote:So when does Vault publicly release the specialty/geographic rankings? That stuff I find kind of interesting.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login