Leveraging without being stupid Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Leveraging without being stupid
Last week I had an interview with a V30 firm for a SA and while I was able to say I had some unpaid gov't offers on the table (not that bluntly), the SA job would be my dream job. They said they understood and would get back to me in a few weeks. Now I have an interview Friday for a non-legal job that pays six figures starting, but would require me to drop down to part-time for the remainder of law school to begin with them now. For the facts, I'm at a lower T-14, median of the class, struck out at OCI, minor WE. Since the Friday interview isn't under the NALP rules and they would want me to start next month, I imagine the possibility of an exploding or one day offer is a possibility, if I get the job. If I get an offer and have 4 hours or a day or whatever to decide, how do I tell the firm I have a six figure offer that pretty much implies I'm not wed to my grave to the legal profession to get them to decide quicker?
-
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 1:59 pm
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
As far as the exploding offer, i'm sure you could stall by staying you need to check on the logistics of being able to switch to part time before you can accept the offer. I don't know a good solution re not telling the firm that your offer is from a non-firm, apart from just hoping they don't ask which firm your offer was from.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
The non-legal job already asked during the screening interview if I would be willing to drop down to part-time, move, etc, so I might be able to get a day for lease checking, but it seems like they need someone fairly critically.zomginternets wrote:As far as the exploding offer, i'm sure you could stall by staying you need to check on the logistics of being able to switch to part time before you can accept the offer. I don't know a good solution re not telling the firm that your offer is from a non-firm, apart from just hoping they don't ask which firm your offer was from.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
interview with v30 for a SA at this stage? lol
- ben4847
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:38 pm
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
Yes, that is quite some feat.Anonymous User wrote:interview with v30 for a SA at this stage? lol
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- MrKappus
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:46 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
If you get the offer from the non-law firm, and it actually turns out to be an exploding offer, say that you will call them back by close of business. Then call the firm and say "I have an offer with a deadline of ________. I wanted to communicate it to you as soon as possible, because [V30 firm...lol] is my top choice for where to work this summer. Thanks very much for your time, and I hope I have the opportunity to learn more about the firm."
Law school needs a class called "life skills." Maybe even a Life Skills I and a Life Skills II.
Law school needs a class called "life skills." Maybe even a Life Skills I and a Life Skills II.
- ben4847
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:38 pm
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
I'm still working on a life. I'm not up to life skills yet.MrKappus wrote:
Law school needs a class called "life skills." Maybe even a Life Skills I and a Life Skills II.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
I know someone with a callback at a v30 in a couple of weeks. Maybe the same firm?Anonymous User wrote:interview with v30 for a SA at this stage? lol
Chicago based firm but in a southern office?
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
Does the non-law job hurt your chances of ever practicing law, or is it a career path where your experience might be helpful to a firm?
Regardless of what the answer to that question is, I'd honestly consider taking the non-law job over the possibility of getting a permanent offer at the v30. Assuming you get the summer offer and get a permanent offer at the v30, attrition rates by the 5th year is something like 80 to 90 percent. You've got an option most law students will never have right now. I'd strongly consider taking it especially if the answers to the following questions are yes:
Is the non-law job a field that you would be happy with?
Is there room for increased pay and responsibilities?
Is it an area that will be around/stay strong in the coming years?
Regardless of what the answer to that question is, I'd honestly consider taking the non-law job over the possibility of getting a permanent offer at the v30. Assuming you get the summer offer and get a permanent offer at the v30, attrition rates by the 5th year is something like 80 to 90 percent. You've got an option most law students will never have right now. I'd strongly consider taking it especially if the answers to the following questions are yes:
Is the non-law job a field that you would be happy with?
Is there room for increased pay and responsibilities?
Is it an area that will be around/stay strong in the coming years?
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
If you mean south of their Chicago office, maybe it's the same firm, but I'm pretty sure the actual southern office of the firm I went to was done hiring.Desert Fox wrote:I know someone with a callback at a v30 in a couple of weeks. Maybe the same firm?Anonymous User wrote:interview with v30 for a SA at this stage? lol
Chicago based firm but in a southern office?
I have considered those factors. This office of the V30 did major layoffs in the recession, but they've had 100% offer rate the last couple of years to SAs. The non-legal job is at a large multinational in a very unstable industry undergoing large layoffs on a regular basis. I did similar work to the non-legal job for a year after college and hated it, hence why I went to law school, but the non-legal job would offer increased pay and responsibilities and is a function that is fairly core to their business. The lateral options would be better from the firm, but the non-legal would be at least decent. I'm also concerned that the non-legal found me online, contacted me, is bringing me into their HQ (it isn't a headhunter, only principals), and is overlooking that I lack six of the seven years required experience for the job. I'm imagining an office on fire and they need some fuel (me) to throw at it. Firm wouldn't be much different from what I hear, but at least it's in a sector I like and wouldn't require me to change graduation/bar exam dates.Aqualibrium wrote:Does the non-law job hurt your chances of ever practicing law, or is it a career path where your experience might be helpful to a firm?
Regardless of what the answer to that question is, I'd honestly consider taking the non-law job over the possibility of getting a permanent offer at the v30. Assuming you get the summer offer and get a permanent offer at the v30, attrition rates by the 5th year is something like 80 to 90 percent. You've got an option most law students will never have right now. I'd strongly consider taking it especially if the answers to the following questions are yes:
Is the non-law job a field that you would be happy with?
Is there room for increased pay and responsibilities?
Is it an area that will be around/stay strong in the coming years?
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
Mayer Brown must have really screwed up OCI callbacks. This is like the 5th or 6th different person I've heard with a callback this late from there. I doubt anything changed in the last two months to change their projections for 2013.
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
Anonymous User wrote:Mayer Brown must have really screwed up OCI callbacks. This is like the 5th or 6th different person I've heard with a callback this late from there. I doubt anything changed in the last two months to change their projections for 2013.
Why do the assholes on this website insist on outing/attempting to out people? The guy didn't list the firm for a reason, speculating on which firm it actually is just isn't relevant or helpful to the discussion.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
I have heard of more than one secondary and tertiary office of vault firms doing callbacks into November/December/January this year. Hell, even one or two big NYC and Chicago firms.
From a firm's perspective, they got bitten in the ass by the economy and had to no-offer/revoke offers. If the can still get median T14 kids, and it's important to them to delay so they don't over-offer, why they hell wouldn't they? It's not surprising in the least.
From a firm's perspective, they got bitten in the ass by the economy and had to no-offer/revoke offers. If the can still get median T14 kids, and it's important to them to delay so they don't over-offer, why they hell wouldn't they? It's not surprising in the least.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
OP here, thanks for the advice. Just got out of the non-legal interview without an exploding offer and no news from the V30 (similar to Mayer, but like I said, not them), so I just get to sweat through Christmas wondering if I have a job at either place.
-
- Posts: 428542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Leveraging without being stupid
I had a callback with Mayer's DC office in January 2011 (I'm a 3L now), so that wouldn't be too surprisingMayer Brown must have really screwed up OCI callbacks. This is like the 5th or 6th different person I've heard with a callback this late from there. I doubt anything changed in the last two months to change their projections for 2013.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login