Top Law Schools

Voodoo94 wrote:

Please, for this sake of this online community's general intelligence level, STFU and GTFO.

Why are you so nasty?

You haven't made a single substantive rebuttal of anything that Buttonpusher has said. As someone who's followed this whole thread, I think you have some nerve telling him to "STFU" when he has made multiple posts of his own experiences. His posts, by the way, jive with just about everything I've heard about the state of solo and small law practice in 2011.

You need to hit the ground running from day one, giving speeches to community groups, writing articles, going to endless number of networking events, etc. etc. Yeah, it won't be easy.

You're a typical, run-of-the mill lawschool lemming

You utterly fail to take into account just how expensive marketing those alleged "skills" is going to be, and once more marketing said skills to a client(s) who has the ability to pay.

My marketing plan doesn't involve buying $9 per-click adwords. It involves going out and talking and interacting with real people. Something that is, largely, free. And that I am good at. So yeah, Buttonpusher can ignore what I actually say all day long and decide to say I am "just another lemming." But in response, I get to tell him to go fuck himself.

Clients with the ability to pay a decent rate to private counsel aren't hanging around the community rooms of a public library at 7 pm on a Tuesday night listening to seminars, they're asking their peer group (business associates, friends etc) for a recommendation to locate an experienced attorney, who's in all likelihood a baby-boomer aged dood.

buttonpusher wrote:

My marketing plan doesn't involve buying $9 per-click adwords. It involves going out and talking and interacting with real people. Something that is, largely, free. And that I am good at. So yeah, Buttonpusher can ignore what I actually say all day long and decide to say I am "just another lemming." But in response, I get to tell him to go fuck himself.

There are a lot of firms in my area that host free seminars on estate planning, elder law, and things of that nature at libraries and community centers to try and drum up business. For the most part, these seminars have pretty low attendance and generally attract "tire kickers" looking for a freebie or some free advice. It's a pretty desperate way to try & market yourself, and mostly done by crappy firms who can't afford legitimate ads like YP and adwords.

Clients with the ability to pay a decent rate to private counsel aren't hanging around the community rooms of a public library at 7 pm on a Tuesday night listening to seminars, they're asking their peer group (business associates, friends etc) for a recommendation to locate an experienced attorney, who's in all likelihood a baby-boomer aged dood. Also don't forget that many employers offer pre-paid legal services for routine things like wills, DWI defense, real estate, etc. As a solo you can pay to join these pre-paid plans, but the hourly rates are VERY low and mostly flat fee deals. Some friends of mine from the doc review circuit all tried these plans/groups and decided it was easier and more profitable just to be a click monkey, with a hell of lot less stress. Of course, they are all "losers" I suppose.

I am somewhat amused by GWU's "carnival barker" business plan, however. Maybe if all else fails he can peddle Sham-Wow rags at the local flea market.

Voodoo94 wrote:

Clients with the ability to pay a decent rate to private counsel aren't hanging around the community rooms of a public library at 7 pm on a Tuesday night listening to seminars, they're asking their peer group (business associates, friends etc) for a recommendation to locate an experienced attorney, who's in all likelihood a baby-boomer aged dood.

This is spot on and is very insightful. This is how individuals with disposable income (ie. desirable clients) shop for legal services.

buttonpusher wrote: Any other claims/suits against a small biz: discrimination, a trip/fall, workers comp etc- will be handled by the insurance carrier, as the policy provides for counsel when you have a suit against you. The carrier will just use their own 40 K a year in-house shitlawyers or farm it out to a shitlaw mill like Wilson Elser.

gwuorbust wrote:

Voodoo94 wrote:

Clients with the ability to pay a decent rate to private counsel aren't hanging around the community rooms of a public library at 7 pm on a Tuesday night listening to seminars, they're asking their peer group (business associates, friends etc) for a recommendation to locate an experienced attorney, who's in all likelihood a baby-boomer aged dood.

This is spot on and is very insightful. This is how individuals with disposable income (ie. desirable clients) shop for legal services.

I actually agree, but there are ways to meet those people. You just have to be innovative. Most people in their 20s are very reluctant to go to boring networking events on topics they have minimal knowledge on. It is not that the opportunities to meet these kinds of people don't exist, it is that buttonpusher and other struggling solos either choose not to or don't know how to find these kinds of events. But again, that is their issue to deal with.

EDIT: just as an example, a local technology-company association has a lot of networking for their members. There are about 250 tech firms among the members and five law firms. I would join this group and go mingle at their events. Yeah, people may not throw themselves at me. But say I meet the CEO of a small tech company. He is now a connection. I can send him relevant links to articles about legal issues related to his company, we can get drinks, and eventually maybe he will retain me. Or he will recommend me to friend. Sending someone a link takes like 10 seconds. And if I work a large enough network, eventually someone will have a legal issue and I will be right there. It's really not that complicated.

kams wrote:
This is much less innovative than you think. Many lawyers and their moms are attempting to network at any possible event to suck in any legal business they can with the economy the way it is. Hope you don't tank, but just know that most struggling solos are not just sitting around not going to events. When your livelihood depends on it, pretty much everyone is doing it. Especially since most lawyers are pretty good with people.

But if you strike gold, then come back and tell us about it.

gwuorbust wrote:

kams wrote:
This is much less innovative than you think. Many lawyers and their moms are attempting to network at any possible event to suck in any legal business they can with the economy the way it is. Hope you don't tank, but just know that most struggling solos are not just sitting around not going to events. When your livelihood depends on it, pretty much everyone is doing it. Especially since most lawyers are pretty good with people.

But if you strike gold, then come back and tell us about it.

Again, like I said I don't think it will be easy and I know some lawyers already do it. But there is a difference between what I am talking about (real strategies to attract clients) and the straw-man arguments buttonpusher keeps throwing up. Like I said, I am gunning for a 5-15 lawyer plaintiff-side firm. But I am realistic and know that the legal market is awful and that I might strike-out. And if I strike out, I see no reason why I shouldn't try to supplement my current 20k/year income with a solo practice. It is not like all my eggs will be in the basket of "going solo." It will just be a second income stream. I don't see how that is controversial.

I actually think I applied to Wilson Elser this recruiting season.

buttonpusher wrote:

I actually think I applied to Wilson Elser this recruiting season.

They are doing OCI now? I thought they strictly went after people with a few years ID experience already under their belt? At least that's how it was back when I was in the rat race. They also advertise on craigslist pretty heavily, esp. for the White Plains (Westchester NY) office, which is a notorious hellhole.

WEMED has a really bad reputation in the NYC area for burning thru associates at lighning speed- back when I was doing depositions there almost every day for plaintiff ambulance chasing (at their 42 st office near Grand Central), the associates were always pushing me resumes and trying to switch over to plaintiff side where there are no billables since it's all contingency.

Doc review is packed with WEMED veterans, as for the hours/stress WEMED requires for 60 K, it's easier just to temp in doc review and fill the gaps between projects with unemployment checks and waiting tables, etc.

I will say the NYC office does a decent job pretending to be real Biglaw- they have little coffee-pod machines, nice furniture/conf rooms, etc. At a plaintiff PI firm people sit on milk crates and desks made from plywood and sawhorses since PI doods are dirt cheap and the clients are all lowlife crackheads anyway.

Was gonna apply in Orlando but ended up not. Interesting stuff.

Anonymous User wrote:What's even more laughable is that you assume every place operates the same. You're talking about NYC, one of the most desirable and expensive places to live in the world. Not every place works the same.

gwuorbust wrote: Please, for this sake of this online community's general intelligence level, STFU and GTFO.

NinerFan wrote:GWU, I think you're underestimating how difficult that is to do..... where exactly are you going to go and "talk to people"

I have been to many of those "networking" organizations.
It is full of 1st year Merrill Lynch "financial advisors" and newbie lawyers trying to find clients.
It all gets old really fast.

REALLYBIGLAW wrote:

gwuorbust wrote: Please, for this sake of this online community's general intelligence level, STFU and GTFO.

You are just a twit to keep your head so firmly in the sand about this. You want buttonpusher to go away because he is writing info that makes you extremely nervous and uncomfortable. This is the brutal reality of newbie solo practice these days. It sucks, but it is true.

You are still on stage 1 of the 5 stages of grief realizing that you made a mistake entering law school.
Stage 1: Denial

In a few years you will have gone through Anger, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance.
Then you will be on JDU.

Anonymous User wrote:A few points. I was the one who posted earlier about my dad being a solo. I'll post under my regular username if needed to lend validity, but I prefer not to talk about my dad being a lawyer.

1) My dad (and a lot of solos that I know through my dad) go to trial. A lot. In fact, my dad has two this week. It's not an everyday thing, but it certainly does happen far more than what some other posters here are saying it does. In fact, his trial skills are one of the reasons people hire him. Not because he's bullheaded and insists on everything going to trial, but because he's not afraid to if he has to.

2) As to Veyron's question, I'm in a pretty major market, and you can get court-appointed stuff pretty easily for criminal work. You have to be approved by the judges, but the work is there. It's not the greatest money, but it's not begging in the street either. Without working murder trials (which take a lot of experience and you won't get those for years), somewhere between $85K and $110K a year, which is quite good here. Low cost of living.

But criminal and civil are two polar opposites in terms of the work and skills required.

3) As for GWU, he may fail, he may not. But the dirty little secret here is that being a lawyer isn't actually all that hard, especially as a solo. For large-firm stuff, it can be pretty challenging, but most of solo work is different. You get a mix of cases, and they are real-world people with real-world problems. If anyone is curious, I can post a lot of the types of stuff my dad and his friends have done. Some interesting, some boring.

But being confident in yourself is a huge part of being a solo. People come to lawyers because they have a pretty bad problem and they need help with it. The first part of getting paying clients is making them feel like you're the person to handle their case.


Look, solo work isn't all unicorns and good times. It'll suck a lot at times. But it does have a lot of rewards, and it's certainly not the valid wasteland some make it out to be. In fact, the term "shitlaw" is pretty stupid. I know a lot of people who are solos or small firm people, and without fail they have all said they love their work and it is, on the whole, pretty interesting.

Objection wrote:Could this anon user PM me? I'm interested in discussing some of what you said more specifically, but don't feel like getting dragged down into the nonsense of this thread.

BeautifulSW wrote:What they DON'T do, and where the Church basement image fits exactly, is prepare for retirement. These folks get to be in their 50s and suddenly realize that they've saved nothing for retirement and they panic because they can't just keep working until they die.