clerkship Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:11 pm
clerkship
1L here
As I understand it, a clerkship is a highly regarded position.
Does it matter which court? The reason I'm asking is because most people, when talking about a clerkship, refer to federal courts. Any reason why?
Thanks.
As I understand it, a clerkship is a highly regarded position.
Does it matter which court? The reason I'm asking is because most people, when talking about a clerkship, refer to federal courts. Any reason why?
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 5:14 pm
Re: clerkship
Yes, the court matters. There is a continuum of "prestige" that goes something like:
SCOTUS
Federal COA
Federal District Court
State Supreme Court
Federal Non-Article III (bankruptcy and magistrate)
State Intermediate Appellate
State Trial Court
There is some overlap there, however -- a few district court clerkships (SDNY, CD Cal, etc.) are probably a little more "prestigious" than a few of the "lesser-regarded" federal COA. And there is a lot of variance in state SC clerkships -- some (Delaware Chancery, NY COA) are probably nearly as prestigious as most federal COA clerkships, and more prestigious than most district court clerkships. Also, bankruptcy clerkship in one of the bigger districts (Delaware, again, probably SDNY as well) would probably be on par with the best district court clerkships if that's what you want to practice.
In terms of when a clerkship stops having any cache with future employers, it's probably the line between a state SC clerkship and a non-Article III federal clerkship (again, with the above bankruptcy caveat). Though some would probably argue that even a state SC clerkship will only have value if it's in the state in which you want to practice.
SCOTUS
Federal COA
Federal District Court
State Supreme Court
Federal Non-Article III (bankruptcy and magistrate)
State Intermediate Appellate
State Trial Court
There is some overlap there, however -- a few district court clerkships (SDNY, CD Cal, etc.) are probably a little more "prestigious" than a few of the "lesser-regarded" federal COA. And there is a lot of variance in state SC clerkships -- some (Delaware Chancery, NY COA) are probably nearly as prestigious as most federal COA clerkships, and more prestigious than most district court clerkships. Also, bankruptcy clerkship in one of the bigger districts (Delaware, again, probably SDNY as well) would probably be on par with the best district court clerkships if that's what you want to practice.
In terms of when a clerkship stops having any cache with future employers, it's probably the line between a state SC clerkship and a non-Article III federal clerkship (again, with the above bankruptcy caveat). Though some would probably argue that even a state SC clerkship will only have value if it's in the state in which you want to practice.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 12:11 pm
Re: clerkship
thanks, the info is very helpful I appreciate it.
so, in general, which of the following is a better choice if given the opportunity.
a clerkship at a state intermediate appellate court or working at a mid-size firm, which specializes in the area of law that you want to practice?
so, in general, which of the following is a better choice if given the opportunity.
a clerkship at a state intermediate appellate court or working at a mid-size firm, which specializes in the area of law that you want to practice?
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: clerkship
Firm, no question.SilenceDoGood wrote:thanks, the info is very helpful I appreciate it.
so, in general, which of the following is a better choice if given the opportunity.
a clerkship at a state intermediate appellate court or working at a mid-size firm, which specializes in the area of law that you want to practice?
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 5:14 pm
Re: clerkship
Firm, with one caveat. I could see an argument that if you are looking to trade up your state appellate clerkship -- either for a state SC clerkship in the state you want to practice, or for a federal Article III clerkship -- in order to move up to a better firm, then that is a plausible career strategy, provided you're not too risk adverse. (Because it would be a risky decision.)a clerkship at a state intermediate appellate court or working at a mid-size firm, which specializes in the area of law that you want to practice?
But why don't you ask the firm if they'd hold the spot for you? A clerkship bonus is probably out of the question, but they might save the job. Then apply for the more prestigious clerkships anyway.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428443
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: clerkship
Here is the thing. You are a 1L. it's fine to ask questions, and to want to research in advance. But you need at least a year of grades before anyone can give you advice on what would be better for you. You need a 2L summer position either lined up or not. You need to have enough experience to have a career plan (corp v lit v nonfirm? bankruptcy? IP? etc).
Then, we can give advice about what would be a realistic clerkship for you to apply for, and whether that'd be better than going straight to your firm. People will weigh in on whether a clerkship would help your career and if so, what kind would be best. Just know that great grades will always help you with your career, and focus on that.
Good luck this semester and ask again in a year!
Then, we can give advice about what would be a realistic clerkship for you to apply for, and whether that'd be better than going straight to your firm. People will weigh in on whether a clerkship would help your career and if so, what kind would be best. Just know that great grades will always help you with your career, and focus on that.
Good luck this semester and ask again in a year!
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: clerkship
Are you referring to post-law school? Because you can potentially do both (most firms will automatically let you go do a federal clerkship and many will allow you do a clerkship at the highest state court). It's more iffy if it's not the highest state court though and firms would probably handle this on a case by case basis. If they do allow it, you do the clerkship for a year (some are two), and then you come to the firm as a second year associate.SilenceDoGood wrote:thanks, the info is very helpful I appreciate it.
so, in general, which of the following is a better choice if given the opportunity.
a clerkship at a state intermediate appellate court or working at a mid-size firm, which specializes in the area of law that you want to practice?
If you are referring to summer jobs while IN law school, then those are judicial internships (and not judicial clerkships). If you have a choice between a mid-size firm you wouldn't mind working at after law school, most people would choose that for your 1L summer. Most everyone would choose the mid-size firm for their 2L summer, because your 2L summer will be how you land your job after law school for a lot of people.