How's your golf game? (serious question)Bronte wrote:How do you envision this "bringing in business" working. You walk over to JPMorgan and ask to speak with Jamie Dimon?Julio_El_Chavo wrote:I love it when people who have gotten ahead in life by checking boxes and being the most perfect, cookie-cutter students they can be struggle to figure out how to bring in business and become partner.
Is this the right way of making partner at a V10? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
No.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:How's your golf game? (serious question)Bronte wrote:How do you envision this "bringing in business" working. You walk over to JPMorgan and ask to speak with Jamie Dimon?Julio_El_Chavo wrote:I love it when people who have gotten ahead in life by checking boxes and being the most perfect, cookie-cutter students they can be struggle to figure out how to bring in business and become partner.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
1. You get staffed on a deal.Bronte wrote:No.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:How's your golf game? (serious question)Bronte wrote:How do you envision this "bringing in business" working. You walk over to JPMorgan and ask to speak with Jamie Dimon?Julio_El_Chavo wrote:I love it when people who have gotten ahead in life by checking boxes and being the most perfect, cookie-cutter students they can be struggle to figure out how to bring in business and become partner.
2. You go golfing with corp dudes involved in deal.
3. You don't suck at golf.
4. Corp Dude A says: "You should come golfing with Corp Dude B [who is NOT involved in your current deal] and I."
5. Talk with Corp Dude B about stuff.
6. ???
7. Profit.
Last edited by Julio_El_Chavo on Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
1. You get staffed on a deal.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:1. You get staffed on a deal.Bronte wrote:No.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:How's your golf game? (serious question)Bronte wrote:
How do you envision this "bringing in business" working. You walk over to JPMorgan and ask to speak with Jamie Dimon?
2. You go golfing with corp dudes involved in deal.
3. You don't suck at golf.
4. Corp Dude A says: "You should come golfing with Corp Dude B and I."
5. Talk with Corp Dude B about stuff
6. ???
7. Profit
2. You go golfing with the analysts doing the bitchwork on the deal like you.
3. All of you get up-and-outed a year later.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sun Oct 16, 2011 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
You seem dumb.Anonymous User wrote:No.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
I wasn't talking about Skadden.Anonymous User wrote:1. You get staffed on a deal.
2. You go golfing with the analysts doing the bitchwork on the deal like you.
3. All of you get up-and-outed a year later.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
You seem like you watch too much TV.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:You seem dumb.Anonymous User wrote:No.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
I've closed deals with people from giant software companies before and that's been my experience.Anonymous User wrote:You seem like you watch too much TV.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:You seem dumb.Anonymous User wrote:No.
How do you think it happens? Most successful businessmen didn't go to great b-schools or attend ivy league colleges, so they're not going to give a shit that you won a Cali award in your torts class and graduated with honors. They work with people they can relate to who have acceptable credentials and experience.
-
- Posts: 428104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Client development in a smaller market or at a certain level of business that V10s don't participate in (like construction law or start-ups), it's going to matter how well you get along with businesspeople, golf, schmooze, whatever.
At a V10 working with huge corporations, it's not going to be like that. Clients choose a law firm primarily based on how well that choice is going to cover their ass if it all turns to shit (e.g. "we hired the best!") instead of how likable that lawyer seemed. If you think you have mad client development skills, don't take those skills to an NYC V10.
At a V10 working with huge corporations, it's not going to be like that. Clients choose a law firm primarily based on how well that choice is going to cover their ass if it all turns to shit (e.g. "we hired the best!") instead of how likable that lawyer seemed. If you think you have mad client development skills, don't take those skills to an NYC V10.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
The question was: "how do you become a V10 partner?" Not: "who do big corps look for when they have big deals?" You become a V10 partner by having your own book of business. You don't get your own clients by serving as a V10 partner's bitch for 10 years. You have to get client contact one way or another.Anonymous User wrote:Client development in a smaller market or at a certain level of business that V10s don't participate in (like construction law or start-ups), it's going to matter how well you get along with businesspeople, golf, schmooze, whatever.
At a V10 working with huge corporations, it's not going to be like that. Clients choose a law firm primarily based on how well that choice is going to cover their ass if it all turns to shit (e.g. "we hired the best!") instead of how likable that lawyer seemed. If you think you have mad client development skills, don't take those skills to an NYC V10.
- SarahKerrigan
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 5:02 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
how much do big law partners usually make? how about mid law partners?
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Wrong. That's what they are telling you because they themselves don't have any business of their own. They are also the least powerful, most expendable partners in the firm, who have zero option to transition to another firm. No other firm will hire them because they offer nothing that a service partner at the new firm doesn't already offer. If they want to be big boys then they get in close with the head of a company or a big finance guy who can give them some business. In the meantime, they dont get full credit for any work they do for institutional clients. Half the credit goes to the relationship partner even if he sat on his ass all year.Based on my conversations with partners at CB's at CSM, etc:
At least within the V10 "bringing in business" isn't a matter of drumming up new clients, at least at the junior partner level.
-
- Posts: 428104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Partners at CSM, S&C, DPW, STB, etc, don't become partners by building a valuable book of business. The firms just aren't structured that way. They're big institutions that have institutional clients and drum up business through formal channels. Over time partners build up some of their own clients, but even then many don't have a lot of portable business. Their clients are the firm's clients.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:The question was: "how do you become a V10 partner?" Not: "who do big corps look for when they have big deals?" You become a V10 partner by having your own book of business. You don't get your own clients by serving as a V10 partner's bitch for 10 years. You have to get client contact one way or another.Anonymous User wrote:Client development in a smaller market or at a certain level of business that V10s don't participate in (like construction law or start-ups), it's going to matter how well you get along with businesspeople, golf, schmooze, whatever.
At a V10 working with huge corporations, it's not going to be like that. Clients choose a law firm primarily based on how well that choice is going to cover their ass if it all turns to shit (e.g. "we hired the best!") instead of how likable that lawyer seemed. If you think you have mad client development skills, don't take those skills to an NYC V10.
Now, client contact is definitely important, but in a different way than you're suggesting. It's more about building excellent relationships with existing clients and having them ask for you to be staffed on your deals. This involves some schmoozing, but also technical skills and interpersonal skills. Spend some time actually talking to V10 partners. Look at the bios of the people recently promoted to partner. The business is much more sophisticated than your TV show/golf outing picture.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
I just... I can't... how do you not see that "what are clients looking for" is the other side of the "client development" coin?Julio_El_Chavo wrote:The question was: "how do you become a V10 partner?" Not: "who do big corps look for when they have big deals?" You become a V10 partner by having your own book of business. You don't get your own clients by serving as a V10 partner's bitch for 10 years. You have to get client contact one way or another.Anonymous User wrote:Client development in a smaller market or at a certain level of business that V10s don't participate in (like construction law or start-ups), it's going to matter how well you get along with businesspeople, golf, schmooze, whatever.
At a V10 working with huge corporations, it's not going to be like that. Clients choose a law firm primarily based on how well that choice is going to cover their ass if it all turns to shit (e.g. "we hired the best!") instead of how likable that lawyer seemed. If you think you have mad client development skills, don't take those skills to an NYC V10.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
I agree with this 100% and I wasn't trying to oversimplify things. I was just illustrating ONE potential avenue for becoming partner that I think is universally effective, even in a V10: bringing in clients with very deep pockets and a large amount of business. The skills required to keep "firm clients" are probably the same exact skills required to develop new ones. The only difference is that firm clients cut you more slack than new clients if you suck at golf or rub them the wrong way.Anonymous User wrote:It's more about building excellent relationships with existing clients and having them ask for you to be staffed on your deals. This involves some schmoozing, but also technical skills and interpersonal skills. Spend some time actually talking to V10 partners. Look at the bios of the people recently promoted to partner. The business is much more sophisticated than your TV show/golf outing picture.
Last edited by Julio_El_Chavo on Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Some of the most powerful partners at CSM, STB, etc, have the least portable business. James Woolery wouldn't have been able to take his JPM business to another firm, for example. The relationship partner for IBM isn't going to take any business with him if he leaves CSM. This limits their mobility on one hand, but on the other hand these partners usually have reputations for tremendous expertise which gives them mobility. Of course, partners almost never leave these firms for others so it's really a moot point.MrAnon wrote:Wrong. That's what they are telling you because they themselves don't have any business of their own. They are also the least powerful, most expendable partners in the firm, who have zero option to transition to another firm. No other firm will hire them because they offer nothing that a service partner at the new firm doesn't already offer. If they want to be big boys then they get in close with the head of a company or a big finance guy who can give them some business. In the meantime, they dont get full credit for any work they do for institutional clients. Half the credit goes to the relationship partner even if he sat on his ass all year.Based on my conversations with partners at CB's at CSM, etc:
At least within the V10 "bringing in business" isn't a matter of drumming up new clients, at least at the junior partner level.
Your characterization probably makes sense at eat what you kill firms, but it's dramatically wrong for the old-line NYC lockstep firms.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Even the firms that are still considered "lockstep" have moved away considerably from the old lockstep mentality of pre-ITE.Anonymous User wrote:Some of the most powerful partners at CSM, STB, etc, have the least portable business. James Woolery wouldn't have been able to take his JPM business to another firm, for example. The relationship partner for IBM isn't going to take any business with him if he leaves CSM. This limits their mobility on one hand, but on the other hand these partners usually have reputations for tremendous expertise which gives them mobility. Of course, partners almost never leave these firms for others so it's really a moot point.MrAnon wrote:Wrong. That's what they are telling you because they themselves don't have any business of their own. They are also the least powerful, most expendable partners in the firm, who have zero option to transition to another firm. No other firm will hire them because they offer nothing that a service partner at the new firm doesn't already offer. If they want to be big boys then they get in close with the head of a company or a big finance guy who can give them some business. In the meantime, they dont get full credit for any work they do for institutional clients. Half the credit goes to the relationship partner even if he sat on his ass all year.Based on my conversations with partners at CB's at CSM, etc:
At least within the V10 "bringing in business" isn't a matter of drumming up new clients, at least at the junior partner level.
Your characterization probably makes sense at eat what you kill firms, but it's dramatically wrong for the old-line NYC lockstep firms.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
The influence of the past decade and ITE on the V10 is quite a bit more complex than "movement away from lockstep towards eat-what-you kill." Yes, the institutional relationships have become weaker. That doesn't mean clients are now picking their lawyers based on their golf game. Clients have become much more sophisticated. They formally evaluate a number of firms and look for the ones that have the particular expertise they need. Firms have responded by increasing the focus on the firm's "brand" and beefing up the firm's formal business development units. This trend has definitely put a focus on super-stars, to the extent that the firm can sell their expertise in pitches, but these super-stars aren't the great schmoozers, they're the ones with superb technical and interpersonal skills.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:Even the firms that are still considered "lockstep" have moved away considerably from the old lockstep mentality of pre-ITE.Anonymous User wrote:Some of the most powerful partners at CSM, STB, etc, have the least portable business. James Woolery wouldn't have been able to take his JPM business to another firm, for example. The relationship partner for IBM isn't going to take any business with him if he leaves CSM. This limits their mobility on one hand, but on the other hand these partners usually have reputations for tremendous expertise which gives them mobility. Of course, partners almost never leave these firms for others so it's really a moot point.MrAnon wrote:
Wrong. That's what they are telling you because they themselves don't have any business of their own. They are also the least powerful, most expendable partners in the firm, who have zero option to transition to another firm. No other firm will hire them because they offer nothing that a service partner at the new firm doesn't already offer. If they want to be big boys then they get in close with the head of a company or a big finance guy who can give them some business. In the meantime, they dont get full credit for any work they do for institutional clients. Half the credit goes to the relationship partner even if he sat on his ass all year.
Your characterization probably makes sense at eat what you kill firms, but it's dramatically wrong for the old-line NYC lockstep firms.
-
- Posts: 428104
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
I'm a naive 2L, so please critique and I won't be offended. I'm going to a V15, west coast office.
My plan is to bill reasonable hours my first 2 years (1900-2100ish), then go a bit harder in years 3-4. At that point, it seems like it's either time to gun for partner, or start focusing on finding something outside of the firm.
From what I've heard, you're most valuable to the firm when you're a 5th-8th year, doing almost-partner level work, but able to bill lower rates than the partner. From some people I've talked to, this seems to be when the real "grind" of BigLaw because your hours are far more valuable than the green 1st year. So it seems like you want to decide around the 4th year whether you want to gun for partner or not. But gunning for partner at this point might also open you up to more exit options in year 5-8 if you don't make partner.
Is any of this correct?
"Gunning for partner" just means doing the awesome things it takes to put yourself in contention to make partner. What that entails, I have really no clue.
My plan is to bill reasonable hours my first 2 years (1900-2100ish), then go a bit harder in years 3-4. At that point, it seems like it's either time to gun for partner, or start focusing on finding something outside of the firm.
From what I've heard, you're most valuable to the firm when you're a 5th-8th year, doing almost-partner level work, but able to bill lower rates than the partner. From some people I've talked to, this seems to be when the real "grind" of BigLaw because your hours are far more valuable than the green 1st year. So it seems like you want to decide around the 4th year whether you want to gun for partner or not. But gunning for partner at this point might also open you up to more exit options in year 5-8 if you don't make partner.
Is any of this correct?
"Gunning for partner" just means doing the awesome things it takes to put yourself in contention to make partner. What that entails, I have really no clue.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
ITT people who have never had a job ponder what it takes to be a Partner of a large organization.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
What on earth makes you think the posters ITT have never had a job?tlstlstls73 wrote:ITT people who have never had a job ponder what it takes to be a Partner of a large organization.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Because it's not rational to obsess about how to make partner if you haven't even started working as an associate. This conversation among law students is asinine. I'd be more curious about "how to be a good associate," than how to make partner.IAFG wrote:What on earth makes you think the posters ITT have never had a job?tlstlstls73 wrote:ITT people who have never had a job ponder what it takes to be a Partner of a large organization.
EDIT: Your own point in the c/o 2013 is what I'm trying to get across:
"So much could change in the next year, I don't know how anyone could really argue one side or the other with any confidence."
If you think this about speculating whether we get no-offered next summer, how can you think speculating about how to achieve a certain (highly unlikely) career outcome 8+ years down the road makes any sense?
Last edited by tlstlstls73 on Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Ah, you mean, "had a job as an associate."tlstlstls73 wrote:Because it's not rational to obsess about how to make partner if you haven't even started working as an associate. This conversation among law students is asinine. I'd be more curious about "how to be a good associate," than how to make partner.IAFG wrote:What on earth makes you think the posters ITT have never had a job?tlstlstls73 wrote:ITT people who have never had a job ponder what it takes to be a Partner of a large organization.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Sure. What other job prepares you to make partner?IAFG wrote:Ah, you mean, "had a job as an associate."tlstlstls73 wrote:Because it's not rational to obsess about how to make partner if you haven't even started working as an associate. This conversation among law students is asinine. I'd be more curious about "how to be a good associate," than how to make partner.IAFG wrote:What on earth makes you think the posters ITT have never had a job?tlstlstls73 wrote:ITT people who have never had a job ponder what it takes to be a Partner of a large organization.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Is this the right way of making partner at a V10?
Well that's not what you said, and I am sure plenty of people ITT have had a chance to see how to get ahead at other enterprises.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login