SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 427953
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY
Thoughts? Pros, cons?
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY
Practice area? You go with feel and strength of practice areas at this level.
-
- Posts: 427953
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY
interested in both corporate and litigation. can anybody speak to the cultures of both?
-
- Posts: 427953
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY
Bump for identifying my exact dilemma.
-
- Posts: 427953
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY
people don't go to sullcrom for the culture they go for the prestige. my research suggests that they are peer firms and the sullcrom prestige bump is overrated. simpson has a better work environmnent.
-
- Posts: 427953
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY
bump - interested too
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login