SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

SullCrom or Simpson Thacher

SullCrom
8
35%
Simpson Thacher
15
65%
 
Total votes: 23

Anonymous User
Posts: 273560
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:02 am

Thoughts? Pros, cons?

User avatar
Bronte
Posts: 2128
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY

Postby Bronte » Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:06 am

Practice area? You go with feel and strength of practice areas at this level.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273560
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:26 pm

interested in both corporate and litigation. can anybody speak to the cultures of both?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273560
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 14, 2011 9:21 pm

Bump for identifying my exact dilemma.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273560
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 14, 2011 11:38 pm

people don't go to sullcrom for the culture they go for the prestige. my research suggests that they are peer firms and the sullcrom prestige bump is overrated. simpson has a better work environmnent.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273560
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: SullCrom v Simpson Thacher NY

Postby Anonymous User » Thu Sep 15, 2011 5:21 pm

bump - interested too




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.