OP here. Recently found out that Cleary's FIG group in NYC has exactly 1 associate. Does this suggest that there is a lot of upside for a junior in terms of substantive work? Or does it suggest that they don't want/need associates in the group?
Thanks all!
DPW vs. Cleary
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 309319
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: DPW vs. Cleary
Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Recently found out that Cleary's FIG group in NYC has exactly 1 associate. Does this suggest that there is a lot of upside for a junior in terms of substantive work? Or does it suggest that they don't want/need associates in the group?
Thanks all!
It means their FIG is probably lacking work and that you won't have any assignments from it.
Return to “Legal Employment�
Who is online
The online users are hidden on this forum.
