Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 273214
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:07 am

What are the big distinctions between these three? For litigation, is it true that in Boston R&G>WH>GP, or is it more granular than this? What are the exit options like from each? Is there a significant difference in reputation outside of New England among them? Particularly interested in how Goodwin will play elsewhere, as Ropes seems pretty established nationally and Wilmer is really buoyed by the DC office.

User avatar
englawyer
Posts: 1270
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Postby englawyer » Sat Sep 03, 2011 8:49 am

at least for IP litigation, WH > R&G.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273214
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:03 am

I am interested in this as well. I would like some thoughts on cultural differences between the three.

User avatar
monkey85
Posts: 394
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:07 pm

Re: Boston firms: R&G, WH, GP

Postby monkey85 » Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:54 am

tag.

interested.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.