Another ranking of top NYC firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428515
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Another ranking of top NYC firms
http://www.4-traders.com/NYSE-EURO-1386 ... -13622517/
Annual Legal Study Ranks Top 25 Law Firms in the United States
Corporate Board Member magazine and global business advisory firm FTI Consulting, Inc. (NYSE: FCN) today announced the results of the 11th annual America's best corporate law firms study, a comprehensive ranking by U.S. corporate directors and general counsel of the top 25 national corporate law firms.
---
Any comment on this? Does it imply that working at Skadden would provide better in-house exit options than Wachtell or Cravath? Or is the ranking just a reflection of the firm as a whole and not the quality of its associates, thus mooting the usefulness of the survey to determine firm exit options (which has been typically measured using Vault prestige rankings by corporate associates -- a not-so-great measure).
Annual Legal Study Ranks Top 25 Law Firms in the United States
Corporate Board Member magazine and global business advisory firm FTI Consulting, Inc. (NYSE: FCN) today announced the results of the 11th annual America's best corporate law firms study, a comprehensive ranking by U.S. corporate directors and general counsel of the top 25 national corporate law firms.
---
Any comment on this? Does it imply that working at Skadden would provide better in-house exit options than Wachtell or Cravath? Or is the ranking just a reflection of the firm as a whole and not the quality of its associates, thus mooting the usefulness of the survey to determine firm exit options (which has been typically measured using Vault prestige rankings by corporate associates -- a not-so-great measure).
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:28 pm
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
Jones Day at #5 tells you that size mattered to this.
-
- Posts: 428515
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
Size may play a role, but Wachtell is in the top 3 suggesting that it doesn't matter too much.terribleperson wrote:Jones Day at #5 tells you that size mattered to this.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
lolwutterribleperson wrote:Jones Day at #5 tells you that size mattered to this.
- JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
Confirmation that Cravath is the Bono of NYC firms.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428515
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
what does bono mean?JusticeHarlan wrote:Confirmation that Cravath is the Bono of NYC firms.
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BonoAnonymous User wrote:what does bono mean?JusticeHarlan wrote:Confirmation that Cravath is the Bono of NYC firms.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
I think Skadden is underrated (all of the "V5 besides Skadden" crap), given it's brand name among corporate folks. That said, the firms that corporations would hire is not coextensive with what firms offer associates the best exit options. Just because a corporate counsel might hire Jones Day to handle an M&A transaction, because of its lower cost structure and presence in a broader range of markets, doesn't mean they would consider an associate from Jones Day to be better for an in-house position than an associate from Simpson Thacher.
- quakeroats
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
If we're talking about associates at any of the firms you mentioned, exit options are more a function of individual than firm.rayiner wrote:I think Skadden is underrated (all of the "V5 besides Skadden" crap), given it's brand name among corporate folks. That said, the firms that corporations would hire is not coextensive with what firms offer associates the best exit options. Just because a corporate counsel might hire Jones Day to handle an M&A transaction, because of its lower cost structure and presence in a broader range of markets, doesn't mean they would consider an associate from Jones Day to be better for an in-house position than an associate from Simpson Thacher.
- Nom Sawyer
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
Could you elaborate on this please? I'm really trying to find out more about what determines your exit options but it seems like there's no clear answers on TLS.quakeroats wrote:If we're talking about associates at any of the firms you mentioned, exit options are more a function of individual than firm.rayiner wrote:I think Skadden is underrated (all of the "V5 besides Skadden" crap), given it's brand name among corporate folks. That said, the firms that corporations would hire is not coextensive with what firms offer associates the best exit options. Just because a corporate counsel might hire Jones Day to handle an M&A transaction, because of its lower cost structure and presence in a broader range of markets, doesn't mean they would consider an associate from Jones Day to be better for an in-house position than an associate from Simpson Thacher.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
You keep speaking authoritatively about exit options. I'm curious to see what reference you are basing your conclusions on.quakeroats wrote:If we're talking about associates at any of the firms you mentioned, exit options are more a function of individual than firm.rayiner wrote:I think Skadden is underrated (all of the "V5 besides Skadden" crap), given it's brand name among corporate folks. That said, the firms that corporations would hire is not coextensive with what firms offer associates the best exit options. Just because a corporate counsel might hire Jones Day to handle an M&A transaction, because of its lower cost structure and presence in a broader range of markets, doesn't mean they would consider an associate from Jones Day to be better for an in-house position than an associate from Simpson Thacher.
Not that I disagree with you on this specific point --- exit options at a very wide range of firms is more about the individual than the firm. That being said, you are you no matter what firm you choose, so that knowledge isn't particularly useful information.
- quakeroats
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
I speak from experience. I'd contend it's useful because many law students spent the last 25 years depending on signaling to move from point A to B. If you walk into a V10 expecting the same system, things may not go so well.rayiner wrote:You keep speaking authoritatively about exit options. I'm curious to see what reference you are basing your conclusions on.quakeroats wrote:If we're talking about associates at any of the firms you mentioned, exit options are more a function of individual than firm.rayiner wrote:I think Skadden is underrated (all of the "V5 besides Skadden" crap), given it's brand name among corporate folks. That said, the firms that corporations would hire is not coextensive with what firms offer associates the best exit options. Just because a corporate counsel might hire Jones Day to handle an M&A transaction, because of its lower cost structure and presence in a broader range of markets, doesn't mean they would consider an associate from Jones Day to be better for an in-house position than an associate from Simpson Thacher.
Not that I disagree with you on this specific point --- exit options at a very wide range of firms is more about the individual than the firm. That being said, you are you no matter what firm you choose, so that knowledge isn't particularly useful information.
- JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
See generally (LinkRemoved)Anonymous User wrote:what does bono mean?JusticeHarlan wrote:Confirmation that Cravath is the Bono of NYC firms.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: Another ranking of top NYC firms
From experience as someone who has worked at a V10 then lateraled in-house, etc?quakeroats wrote:I speak from experience. I'd contend it's useful because many law students spent the last 25 years depending on signaling to move from point A to B. If you walk into a V10 expecting the same system, things may not go so well.rayiner wrote:You keep speaking authoritatively about exit options. I'm curious to see what reference you are basing your conclusions on.quakeroats wrote:If we're talking about associates at any of the firms you mentioned, exit options are more a function of individual than firm.rayiner wrote:I think Skadden is underrated (all of the "V5 besides Skadden" crap), given it's brand name among corporate folks. That said, the firms that corporations would hire is not coextensive with what firms offer associates the best exit options. Just because a corporate counsel might hire Jones Day to handle an M&A transaction, because of its lower cost structure and presence in a broader range of markets, doesn't mean they would consider an associate from Jones Day to be better for an in-house position than an associate from Simpson Thacher.
Not that I disagree with you on this specific point --- exit options at a very wide range of firms is more about the individual than the firm. That being said, you are you no matter what firm you choose, so that knowledge isn't particularly useful information.
As a counter-weight to your "experience," I'm someone who spent my first 25 years not depending on signaling to move from point A to point B. I worked at a start-up and companies with no name recognition because I got top-notch work. I found it... an uphill battle. You're placed in a bucket the minute you mention where you work or where you went to school. Only after that do people look at your work product --- if even then. Being in a position for the first time to depend on signaling, I have to say it's a huge difference. My dad was at one of those $$$ per plate fund raisers for a non-profit (he does their business development), and he and someone who could afford to be there were chatting about their kids. He mentioned where I worked over the summer and the guy recognized it and even knew the firm's address. Having experienced the other side of the coin, I am very hesitant to say signaling doesn't matter.
Maybe lateraling from a law firm is different. I don't personally have any experience as a lateral candidate, so I really don't know. I'm just speaking based on my own experience. That said, having been on the outside looking in, if I had to go back and make the decision again, I'd make the same one.
FWIW.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login