Interesting. I didn't even get a screener with them. T10, Top 25%, AZ resident.Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.
Congrats...
Interesting. I didn't even get a screener with them. T10, Top 25%, AZ resident.Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.
Ditto. T10, LR, same range, no screener.Anonymous User wrote:Interesting. I didn't even get a screener with them. T10, Top 25%, AZ resident.Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.
Congrats...
Anonymous User wrote:Ditto. T10, LR, same range, no screener.Anonymous User wrote:Interesting. I didn't even get a screener with them. T10, Top 25%, AZ resident.Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.
Congrats...
According to NALP, the incoming OM summer associate class size is a whopping 1. Congrats to the chosen 1.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Ditto. T10, LR, same range, no screener.Anonymous User wrote:Interesting. I didn't even get a screener with them. T10, Top 25%, AZ resident.Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.
Congrats...
I'm told they want very top of class in any candidate. You'll see more top 1, 2, 3 students from local schools than top 1/3 or 1/4 from higher ranked schools.
Anonymous User wrote:
According to NALP, the incoming OM summer associate class size is a whopping 1. Congrats to the chosen 1.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
It was never said that OM was not a good place to be. The extremely small SA class size certainly allows them to cherry pick.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
According to NALP, the incoming OM summer associate class size is a whopping 1. Congrats to the chosen 1.
Supposedly they are bringing back a 1L and a second 2L, for a total of 2. Regardless of size it is a good place to be.
I thought that they didn't make offers out of their summer program so much anymore?Anonymous User wrote:It was never said that OM was not a good place to be. The extremely small SA class size certainly allows them to cherry pick.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
According to NALP, the incoming OM summer associate class size is a whopping 1. Congrats to the chosen 1.
Supposedly they are bringing back a 1L and a second 2L, for a total of 2. Regardless of size it is a good place to be.
Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.
OP here. Can you speak to the benefits of OM? I'm interested in any thoughts folks might have. Thank you.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
According to NALP, the incoming OM summer associate class size is a whopping 1. Congrats to the chosen 1.
Supposedly they are bringing back a 1L and a second 2L, for a total of 2. Regardless of size it is a good place to be.
Different user: AZ market pay, low billables (and billing expectations), good partnership prospects, extremely high level litigation work with renowned litigators.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.OP here. Can you speak to the benefits of OM? I'm interested in any thoughts folks might have. Thank you.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
According to NALP, the incoming OM summer associate class size is a whopping 1. Congrats to the chosen 1.
Supposedly they are bringing back a 1L and a second 2L, for a total of 2. Regardless of size it is a good place to be.
The NALP form indicates that 1800 is the requirement. In my experience the NALP numbers are understated and do not accurately capture the reality of billing demands. Is that not the case at Osborn?Anonymous User wrote:Different user: AZ market pay, low billables (and billing expectations), good partnership prospects, extremely high level litigation work with renowned litigators.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:CB with Osborn. T-40, T 5%, LR, OOS.OP here. Can you speak to the benefits of OM? I'm interested in any thoughts folks might have. Thank you.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:
According to NALP, the incoming OM summer associate class size is a whopping 1. Congrats to the chosen 1.
Supposedly they are bringing back a 1L and a second 2L, for a total of 2. Regardless of size it is a good place to be.
I received one of these letters last Friday. Seems like their process is going to be pretty drawn out.Anonymous User wrote:Any more movement?
Did anybody get a letter from Gammage & Burnham stating that the candidate is still under consideration? I know someone that got a letter like that, but I did not get one. It also seems kind of funky.
Anonymous User wrote:I received one of these letters last Friday. Seems like their process is going to be pretty drawn out.Anonymous User wrote:Any more movement?
Did anybody get a letter from Gammage & Burnham stating that the candidate is still under consideration? I know someone that got a letter like that, but I did not get one. It also seems kind of funky.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
From what I understand Osborn is an exception to that rule. Or, at least, they expect fewer hours actually billed during a good year than other Valley firms that claim an 1,800 min.The NALP form indicates that 1800 is the requirement. In my experience the NALP numbers are understated and do not accurately capture the reality of billing demands. Is that not the case at Osborn?
Thank you for this.Anonymous User wrote:From what I understand Osborn is an exception to that rule. Or, at least, they expect fewer hours actually billed during a good year than other Valley firms that claim an 1,800 min.The NALP form indicates that 1800 is the requirement. In my experience the NALP numbers are understated and do not accurately capture the reality of billing demands. Is that not the case at Osborn?
ASU/UA. Can't answer the second question for reasons that could out me, sorry.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:I received one of these letters last Friday. Seems like their process is going to be pretty drawn out.Anonymous User wrote:Any more movement?
Did anybody get a letter from Gammage & Burnham stating that the candidate is still under consideration? I know someone that got a letter like that, but I did not get one. It also seems kind of funky.
Local school? Did you have a CB?
Np.Anonymous User wrote:Thank you for this.Anonymous User wrote:From what I understand Osborn is an exception to that rule. Or, at least, they expect fewer hours actually billed during a good year than other Valley firms that claim an 1,800 min.The NALP form indicates that 1800 is the requirement. In my experience the NALP numbers are understated and do not accurately capture the reality of billing demands. Is that not the case at Osborn?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Read closely. The NALP forms are only updated once a year, in April. So all of the expected numbers of SAs listed are for the summer of 2011, not for 2012.Anonymous User wrote:Interviewer for FC said that they are only looking for 4-5 SA's. Thought I'd point this out as it differs greatly from their NALP forecast.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Ballard Spahr - New to Phoenix. Has grown from about 15 to 35 lawyers in the roughly 5 years since their office opened.Anonymous User wrote:People who know phoenix:
I am considering 4 firms. Can you briefly describe your impression for culture and quality at each of these Phoenix branches? I know local brands differ from national or web reputation.
Ballard Spahr
Steptoe and Johnson
Tiffany and Bosco
Bryan Cave
I appreciate any help. Just looking for a local perspective.
Offers? Do you have ties to AZ?Anonymous User wrote:People who know phoenix:
I am considering 4 firms. Can you briefly describe your impression for culture and quality at each of these Phoenix branches? I know local brands differ from national or web reputation.
Ballard Spahr
Steptoe and Johnson
Tiffany and Bosco
Bryan Cave
I appreciate any help. Just looking for a local perspective.
Is this a joke? T&B has a terrible reputation.Anonymous User wrote:Tiffany and Bosco - Great reputation, Very, very selective,
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login