I'd guess they might be thinking lit or more likely soft IP like copyrights? I'd definitely say I planned to take copyrights and trademarks in the interview if I was you.Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
WUSL EIW Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: WUSL EIW
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Mine says pending (probably ding like the off campus stuff), not IP, but they have a trademark practice which is probably what interview slot you got.Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Yeah'll I actually will be taking trademarks as it something I'm interested in. I'll just do some research and find someway to Spin. Spin to win.stratocophic wrote:I'd guess they might be thinking lit or more likely soft IP like copyrights? I'd definitely say I planned to take copyrights and trademarks in the interview if I was you.Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Smart (wo)man.Anonymous User wrote:Yeah'll I actually will be taking trademarks as it something I'm interested in. I'll just do some research and find someway to Spin. Spin to win.stratocophic wrote:I'd guess they might be thinking lit or more likely soft IP like copyrights? I'd definitely say I planned to take copyrights and trademarks in the interview if I was you.Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
- emciosn
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: WUSL EIW
I saw it said that they would take business degrees for the trademarks practice area so maybe that's it? Maybe it wasn't bid on very heavily and they took you based on numbers?Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
Edit: didn't read above posts, beat me to it
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
Stats if you don't mind?
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Updating this from earlier because I got Husch and Bryan Cave. Also a chance I wind up with another firm that is interviewing at OCI if things work out, but probably will interview off-campus.Anonymous User wrote:Top 20%, Law Review, non-URM, non-IP, targeted exclusively Midwest firms (I think it would be really helpful if people provided this info when sharing interview results... without it, it is kinda useless)
12 pre-selects
1 lottery
1 alternate
Overall pretty pleased with the number (especially if I can snag Husch or Bryan Cave as well), but a lot of these firms are in markets that I have no ties to. Gonna have to do some serious research and sell it hard.
So Top 20%, Law Review, non-URM, non-IP, targeted exclusively Midwest firms
14 pre-selects
1 lottery
1 alternate
Very pleased, feeling like I outdid my numbers.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
13/22, evidently I did pick up Husch. More than a little confused about the location, but I'm not a complainerAnonymous User wrote:12/22 final then, got dinged. Thought the IP-heavy Chicago office might want a look, but not too put-out about it. Congrats to people who picked one up with them!
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Do many more employers sign up for later OCI stages? Or was EIW the vast majority?
- emciosn
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: WUSL EIW
Probably a majority but not the vast majority. There are like 21 for OCI week 1 then like twelve for the next two OCI weeks at this point so that's somewhat encouraging I guess. I did notice that there are a lot of resume collects in the later OCI weeks.Anonymous User wrote:Do many more employers sign up for later OCI stages? Or was EIW the vast majority?
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: WUSL EIW
No CB updates, but I thought the Knight center snacks were very good. The vanilla bread pudding was especially tasty.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: WUSL EIW
I'm actually angry that I didn't know this was a thing. Best believe I'll be all over that tomorrow.romothesavior wrote:No CB updates, but I thought the Knight center snacks were very good. The vanilla bread pudding was especially tasty.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Be verrrrry careful about Brinks. They just lost a huge chunk of their partners and laid off 18 attorneys less than a year ago. I've talked to a number of IP folks, including local IP partners, who are convinced that the firm is on its last legs. Think --LinkRemoved--Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
second on this, I don't think they are really recruiting.Anonymous User wrote:Be verrrrry careful about Brinks. They just lost a huge chunk of their partners and laid off 18 attorneys less than a year ago. I've talked to a number of IP folks, including local IP partners, who are convinced that the firm is on its last legs. Think --LinkRemoved--Anonymous User wrote:I bid on Brinks Hofer was slected for an interview, However, I just realized It's an IP firm, and I'm not IP. Why did they select me for an interview? I thought they were exclusively an IP firm. Maybe interviewing for a patent job that doesn't require an IP background?Anonymous User wrote:Just got Brinks Hofer in the weird one-slot 2nd EIW round as well. 12/22.
Can't look a gift horse in the mouth I guess.
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
I just had my Brinks Interview. The interviewer seemed kind of quiet/down, but you might be able to chalk that up to him being a engineering type rather than a type A in your face litigator.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
cbs from Locke Lord (today) and Chapman (yesterday)
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Also got Locke. Kind of narrows down who we both are, but I dunno who any of the other people who were at the dinner are on TLS so ANONSECURE. Waiting on everyone else still, kind of expecting one from V&E. The others could all go either way, we'll see I guess.Anonymous User wrote:cbs from Locke Lord (today) and Chapman (yesterday)
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
stats?Anonymous User wrote:cbs from Locke Lord (today) and Chapman (yesterday)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Don't want to be too specific but well out of top 10%, no LR, non-URM.Anonymous User wrote:stats?Anonymous User wrote:cbs from Locke Lord (today) and Chapman (yesterday)
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
I'm the other anon with an LLBL CB. Looks like they're interviewing for fit and not credentials, all 3 of those things apply to me.Anonymous User wrote:Don't want to be too specific but well out of top 10%, no LR, non-URM.Anonymous User wrote:stats?Anonymous User wrote:cbs from Locke Lord (today) and Chapman (yesterday)
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Dang, congrats. Thought my interview with LLB&L was the best yet in terms of just having a solid conversation/fitting in. Top-quarter though, so maybe too low or I am just really really bad at interviewing.Anonymous User wrote:I'm the other anon with an LLBL CB. Looks like they're interviewing for fit and not credentials, all 3 of those things apply to me.Anonymous User wrote:Don't want to be too specific but well out of top 10%, no LR, non-URM.Anonymous User wrote:stats?Anonymous User wrote:cbs from Locke Lord (today) and Chapman (yesterday)
-
- Posts: 428557
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: WUSL EIW
Sorry man. I dunno, I don't think it's your credentials, I feel like ~5% difference is nothing. Very likely just a really tough call on who they thought fit best, maybe they just liked the practice area I said I wanted or thought my reason for the market was compelling. Really no telling, but don't be discouraged. I've gotten one CB where I thought the interview was strikingly mediocre, other times thought I crushed the interview and got nada even though the firm was in my home market and everything. Messed up process, nothing to do but keep doing what we WUSTLers do best - acting normal/sociable/approachable. That might be our strongest selling point, according to the LLBL interviewers. It's not "you're all strikingly intelligent," but I'll take it I guess.Anonymous User wrote:Dang, congrats. Thought my interview with LLB&L was the best yet in terms of just having a solid conversation/fitting in. Top-quarter though, so maybe too low or I am just really really bad at interviewing.Anonymous User wrote:I'm the other anon with an LLBL CB. Looks like they're interviewing for fit and not credentials, all 3 of those things apply to me.Anonymous User wrote:Don't want to be too specific but well out of top 10%, no LR, non-URM.Anonymous User wrote:
stats?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login