Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428468
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP
So, I noticed that there is a field in the NALP directory called "Average annual associate hours worked". It seems like many firms don't have an entry populated in this field, but the ones which do have an amount which is lower than what I'd expect. For example, here is the data from Cadwalader's NYC form:
Average annual associate hours worked: 2090 (2009) 2055 (2010)
Average annual associate billable hours: 1900 (2009) 1866 (2010)
There are two things which seem odd. First, billable hours make up over 90% of "hours worked", which seems like an impossible ratio. Second, roughly 2100 hours worked comes out to under 45 hours a week, with 4 weeks vacation. I am sure no one at Cadwalader is working under 45 hours a week on average. Does anyone know how they calculate this? It is just hours spent physically in the office, where most associates are spending another 10-15 hours a week working at home?
Average annual associate hours worked: 2090 (2009) 2055 (2010)
Average annual associate billable hours: 1900 (2009) 1866 (2010)
There are two things which seem odd. First, billable hours make up over 90% of "hours worked", which seems like an impossible ratio. Second, roughly 2100 hours worked comes out to under 45 hours a week, with 4 weeks vacation. I am sure no one at Cadwalader is working under 45 hours a week on average. Does anyone know how they calculate this? It is just hours spent physically in the office, where most associates are spending another 10-15 hours a week working at home?
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP
Anonymous User wrote:So, I noticed that there is a field in the NALP directory called "Average annual associate hours worked". It seems like many firms don't have an entry populated in this field, but the ones which do have an amount which is lower than what I'd expect. For example, here is the data from Cadwalader's NYC form:
Average annual associate hours worked: 2090 (2009) 2055 (2010)
Average annual associate billable hours: 1900 (2009) 1866 (2010)
There are two things which seem odd. First, billable hours make up over 90% of "hours worked", which seems like an impossible ratio. Second, roughly 2100 hours worked comes out to under 45 hours a week, with 4 weeks vacation. I am sure no one at Cadwalader is working under 45 hours a week on average. Does anyone know how they calculate this? It is just hours spent physically in the office, where most associates are spending another 10-15 hours a week working at home?
Another related question. On Cadwalader's and many other firms they have a average annual billable hours and a required billable hours. The average is often less than the required. Does this mean that, on average, associates don't make minimum billable hours? Or do the averages include part-time employees which may explain why hour worked is so low.
Average annual associate billable hours: 1900 (2009) 1866 (2010)
Is there a minimum billable hour expectation? Y
If "Yes", number: 2000
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP
Breaking news: Law firms lie; stretch truth when beneficial. More at 11.
- Unitas
- Posts: 1379
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP
If this were true, firms would indicate that the average associate meets billable hours requirements though.thesealocust wrote:Breaking news: Law firms lie; stretch truth when beneficial. More at 11.
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP
I'll mention that the next time I'm working with a Cadwalader attorney past midnight on a weeknight.Unitas wrote:If this were true, firms would indicate that the average associate meets billable hours requirements though.thesealocust wrote:Breaking news: Law firms lie; stretch truth when beneficial. More at 11.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- smokyroom26
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:56 am
Re: Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP
I'd like to state for the record that I love you.thesealocust wrote:I'll mention that the next time I'm working with a Cadwalader attorney past midnight on a weeknight.Unitas wrote:If this were true, firms would indicate that the average associate meets billable hours requirements though.thesealocust wrote:Breaking news: Law firms lie; stretch truth when beneficial. More at 11.
- clintonius
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am
Re: Associate Hours Worked Field - NALP
My guess is that "hours worked" actually comes from the associates' billables before any time was written off, and is the sum of that time plus pro bono, administration, etc. The actual number of hours the associates worked is probably quite a bit higher.