Poverty, taste, and biglaw Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
OP, why don't you and I start our own shop? You seem like a good dood.
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
LOL cant believe I missed thatrad law wrote:Never tasted wine? Wut.
OP if you've never had wine its not expensive hobos drink the stuff
if you meant you've never gone wine tasting at a winery, thats not expensive either. Just go to a vineyard, most of em have free tastings
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
wait, are you saying there arent workplace barriers for minorities, say in the biglaw world? or are you just saying firms arent completely racially homogeneous and that they do network across racial lines?Veyron wrote:What is this, the 1960s? I mean, I guess it COULD be like this in biglaw, but it hasn't been like this in any office environment in which I've worked. . . ever. People rarely hire people they don't get along with and hiring committees aren't racially homogenous and people don't become or stay high-powered professionals if they don't network across racial lines.racial lines
Social class is a much more potent predictor of fit.
if the first, GTFO. if the second, yeah i agree.
- Leira7905
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Red: Cabernet Sauvignondr123 wrote:LOL cant believe I missed thatrad law wrote:Never tasted wine? Wut.
OP if you've never had wine its not expensive hobos drink the stuff
if you meant you've never gone wine tasting at a winery, thats not expensive either. Just go to a vineyard, most of em have free tastings
White: can't go wrong with a nice Pinot Grigio
when in doubt, look at the prices and order something in the middle... Not too cheap, not too expensive.
ETA: Never, Never order pink wine.... Ever.
Last edited by Leira7905 on Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 428446
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
I stated openly during my summer program that I honestly couldn't tell the difference between Andre and Moët. I got laughter (with me, not at me), and even some nods of acknowledgement from some partners.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
white: riesling if you dont often drink wineLeira7905 wrote:Red: Cabernet Sauvignondr123 wrote:LOL cant believe I missed thatrad law wrote:Never tasted wine? Wut.
OP if you've never had wine its not expensive hobos drink the stuff
if you meant you've never gone wine tasting at a winery, thats not expensive either. Just go to a vineyard, most of em have free tastings
White: can't go wrong with a nice Pinot Grigio
when in doubt, look at the prices and order something in the middle... Not too cheap, not too expensive.
ETA: Never, Never order pink wine.... Ever.
-
- Posts: 428446
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
This is good advice. I highly, highly recommend Letitia Baldrige's New Complete Guide to Executive Manners.eandy wrote:What you need is a good book on etiquette, preferably this (an older edition would work just fine).
The most important thing is etiquette. If you are always polite, well-mannered, and willing to learn about new things, ignorance is quickly forgiven and forgotten.
Also, don't worry too much about it. Yes, rich people yacht and golf and drink absurdly expensive bordeaux. But rich people also ski, and shoot quail, and watch baseball, and drink beer. There's no need to pretend to like "rich" stuff; it's better just to try and find common ground for conversation, and there's almost always something.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:32 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
riiiiight. Lawyers are the biggest donors to the Democratic party, ahead of even unions in their donations, and they gave in record amounts in 2008 to elect Obama. But somehow, the biggest donors to democrats and the ones who'll raise the most money for him in 2012 are all secretly closet racists who hate to see a black guy in their offices.DoubleChecks wrote:wait, are you saying there arent workplace barriers for minorities, say in the biglaw world? or are you just saying firms arent completely racially homogeneous and that they do network across racial lines?Veyron wrote:What is this, the 1960s? I mean, I guess it COULD be like this in biglaw, but it hasn't been like this in any office environment in which I've worked. . . ever. People rarely hire people they don't get along with and hiring committees aren't racially homogenous and people don't become or stay high-powered professionals if they don't network across racial lines.racial lines
Social class is a much more potent predictor of fit.
if the first, GTFO. if the second, yeah i agree.
Yeah, that makes sense
Last edited by gabbagabba on Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
The 2nd. Obviously minorities are underrepresented in the professions.DoubleChecks wrote:wait, are you saying there arent workplace barriers for minorities, say in the biglaw world? or are you just saying firms arent completely racially homogeneous and that they do network across racial lines?Veyron wrote:What is this, the 1960s? I mean, I guess it COULD be like this in biglaw, but it hasn't been like this in any office environment in which I've worked. . . ever. People rarely hire people they don't get along with and hiring committees aren't racially homogenous and people don't become or stay high-powered professionals if they don't network across racial lines.racial lines
Social class is a much more potent predictor of fit.
if the first, GTFO. if the second, yeah i agree.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
The second is intuitively obvious. My posts were more about the first.The 2nd. Obviously minorities are underrepresented in the professions.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
You don't have to be racist or a republican to be stuck in a mindset of white privilege and to fail to understand what people who are not born in that privilege experience. I'm not saying that people not in white privilege suffer inordinately (though that is the case for some segments of the population). I am saying that white privilege subconsciously influences things in almost every segment of corporate America. You don't have to refer to someone with a racial slur to exclude them from power structures. Most of the time, stuff a lot less facially offensive will do the job.riiiiight. Lawyers are the biggest donors to the Democratic party, ahead of even unions in their donations, and they gave in record amounts in 2008 to elect Obama. But somehow, the biggest donors to democrats are all secretly closet racists who hate to see a black guy in their offices.
Yeah, that makes sense
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Lol, white privelage. Class is everything bro. I can't tell you how many minorities I know that are WELL integrated with the power structure because they come from money. G-d bless America.Stanislaw Carter wrote:You don't have to be racist or a republican to be stuck in a mindset of white privilege and to fail to understand what people who are not born in that privilege experience. I'm not saying that people not in white privilege suffer inordinately (though that is the case for some segments of the population). I am saying that white privilege subconsciously influences things in almost every segment of corporate America. You don't have to refer to someone with a racial slur to exclude them from power structures. Most of the time, stuff a lot less facially offensive will do the job.riiiiight. Lawyers are the biggest donors to the Democratic party, ahead of even unions in their donations, and they gave in record amounts in 2008 to elect Obama. But somehow, the biggest donors to democrats are all secretly closet racists who hate to see a black guy in their offices.
Yeah, that makes sense
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:32 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Now you're getting into equal opportunity vs equal outcome, which is another debate entirely.Stanislaw Carter wrote:You don't have to be racist or a republican to be stuck in a mindset of white privilege and to fail to understand what people who are not born in that privilege experience. I'm not saying that people not in white privilege suffer inordinately (though that is the case for some segments of the population). I am saying that white privilege subconsciously influences things in almost every segment of corporate America. You don't have to refer to someone with a racial slur to exclude them from power structures. Most of the time, stuff a lot less facially offensive will do the job.riiiiight. Lawyers are the biggest donors to the Democratic party, ahead of even unions in their donations, and they gave in record amounts in 2008 to elect Obama. But somehow, the biggest donors to democrats are all secretly closet racists who hate to see a black guy in their offices.
Yeah, that makes sense
But I still find it completely moronic how people think biglaw is racist, when they've been the biggest donors to democrats for decades. How can people say law is racist?
It's like saying Planned Parenthood is full of KKK members and racist because most of the abortions they perform are for black women.
Last edited by gabbagabba on Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Even if you do know people that have in fact 100% integrated into these power structures, that doesn't disprove my argument. Try again.Lol, white privelage. Class is everything bro. I can't tell you how many minorities I know that are WELL integrated with the power structure because they come from money. G-d bless America.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Errrr... I know plenty of racist democrats. Donating to the democratic party doesn't automatically make one not racist.But I still find it completely moronic how people think biglaw is racist, when they've the biggest donors to democrats for decades. How can people say law is racist?
- Leira7905
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
gabbagabba wrote:It's like saying Planned Parenthood is full of KKK members and racist because most of the abortions they perform are for black women.
- Stringer6
- Posts: 5919
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:45 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Whoever turned this into a politics discussion is a jerk
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
*Waits for emperical data on "white-privilege"*Stanislaw Carter wrote:Even if you do know people that have in fact 100% integrated into these power structures, that doesn't disprove my argument. Try again.Lol, white privelage. Class is everything bro. I can't tell you how many minorities I know that are WELL integrated with the power structure because they come from money. G-d bless America.
*Doesn't hold breath*
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:32 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
First post to bring racial tensions as a potential problem was . . .Stringer6 wrote:Whoever turned this into a politics discussion is a jerk
Stanislaw Carter wrote:Conversational problems between young associates and partners don't just arise along income lines. They also arise along gender and racial lines. Just be polite, talk about something you can both relate to. If you can't relate to anything, talk about their work.
Aside from that, just have good table manners. If anything, I think people who come from low-income backgrounds tend to stand out in a good way. They tend to be humble and don't feel any sense of entitlement. If you don't know what wine to order (which shouldn't be a problem, as a summer associate will never be asked to select the wines) or how to do some "high-class" thing, it really doesn't matter. Heck, I'd just blatantly say, "I have no idea about wines." It breaks up the pretentiousness quite a bit.
Last edited by gabbagabba on Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
*Waits for 1L to get out of a thread he can have no input on**Waits for emperical data on "white-privilege"*
*Doesn't hold breath*
*Doesn't hold breath*
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
a) Never said there were racial tensions. Just that there are racial barriers to effective communication between people, just like there are generational barriers and gender barriers.First post to bring racial tensions as a potential problem was . . .
b) Mentioning these barriers does not turn a conversation into politics.
Last edited by Stanislaw Carter on Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
*Is straight from undergrad**Waits for 1L to get out of a thread he can have no input on*
*Doesn't hold breath*
*Thinks that no 1Ls have valuable insight into working in a professional environment with highly paid professionals*
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
You don't know anything about me.*Is straight from undergrad*
Nope. I just think that you have no valuable insight because you haven't worked at a big law firm, and that working for another corporation doesn't necessarily make you qualified to speak on this issue.*Thinks that no 1Ls have valuable insight into working in a professional environment with highly paid professionals*
- Leira7905
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
What? Why do you have to be 2L, 3L, and beyond to have had experience interacting with professionals with a higher socio-economic status... Some people have relevant input from previous professions/life experience.Stanislaw Carter wrote:*Waits for 1L to get out of a thread he can have no input on**Waits for emperical data on "white-privilege"*
*Doesn't hold breath*
*Doesn't hold breath*
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login