TLS 2010 OCI Study

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Stats
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:21 pm

Re: TLS 2010 OCI Study

Postby Stats » Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:27 pm

Desert Fox wrote:I was joking. There probably weren't enough samples of chicago bids to make clear trends. Conventional wisdom is NYC is better.


Yes, geographic effects are probably the hardest to pickup with this sample because lots of people targeted multiple markets.

missinglink
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:49 am

Re: TLS 2010 OCI Study

Postby missinglink » Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:38 am

Just saw this. Great stuff!

User avatar
heavoldgotjuice
Posts: 472
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2014 6:48 pm

Re: TLS 2010 OCI Study

Postby heavoldgotjuice » Tue Jul 22, 2014 2:30 pm

this shit is good

User avatar
Arkham
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:08 pm

Re: TLS 2010 OCI Study

Postby Arkham » Wed Jul 23, 2014 6:47 am

This is super interesting. I'm really surprised by the conversion rate of screeners to CBs. Is that 41% accurate? I honestly would have guessed that it would be under 30%, and maybe significantly under for a lot of firms.

dead head
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:35 am

Re: TLS 2010 OCI Study

Postby dead head » Wed Jul 23, 2014 8:54 am

There are obviously huge selection biases at play here, and I'm not sure this data (although interesting) is worth a lot more than old claims from schools like Hofstra that the average starting salary in private practice is $160k.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.