Top Law Schools

Anonymous User wrote:

keg411 wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:So far I have two offers and one upcoming interview. Can anyone help me rank these positions? I'm very happy to even have a choice, but I'm pretty confused at this point.

1) Offer from a small firm (10-15 attornies).
2) Offer from a DA's Office in one of the NY boroughs.
3) Upcoming interview with a state equity & probate judge.

They're all very different, and I'm not sure if one would look better than the other or give me better experience. Help?

1) What kind of work does the small firm do? Is it a practice area you want to get into in the future? Does it pay? Do you have the potential to get an offer for 2L summer that pays and can lead to permanent employment?
2) Do you have interest in criminal work?
3) Working for a judge is fine if the firm doesn't pay and won't lead anywhere and you have zero interest in criminal work.

1) The firm does a little bit of everything, including arts & entertainment law, which is of particular interest to me. The partner who interviewed me is extremely flexible and basically told me I can jump in on whatever projects seem interesting. It's part time and unpaid, but if all goes well over the summer I have the option of working there during 2L and maybe next summer. Since it's part time I'd either have to find another legal job (maybe RA?) or maybe bartend.

2) I find criminal work interesting and I have no idea if it's something I'd want to do in the future, which is why I applied to the DA's office. I figure, I'll finally know if it's something I'd like to pursue. I've heard that even if you don't end up liking the work it's great experience.

The firm seems to make the most sense, but like I said I'm confused and I've heard so many different things. One of my professors told me to take a clerkship if I get it because you can always work at a firm later. Two different attornies I've spoken to told me to take the DA position.

get it to x wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

keg411 wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:So far I have two offers and one upcoming interview. Can anyone help me rank these positions? I'm very happy to even have a choice, but I'm pretty confused at this point.

1) Offer from a small firm (10-15 attornies).
2) Offer from a DA's Office in one of the NY boroughs.
3) Upcoming interview with a state equity & probate judge.

They're all very different, and I'm not sure if one would look better than the other or give me better experience. Help?

1) What kind of work does the small firm do? Is it a practice area you want to get into in the future? Does it pay? Do you have the potential to get an offer for 2L summer that pays and can lead to permanent employment?
2) Do you have interest in criminal work?
3) Working for a judge is fine if the firm doesn't pay and won't lead anywhere and you have zero interest in criminal work.

1) The firm does a little bit of everything, including arts & entertainment law, which is of particular interest to me. The partner who interviewed me is extremely flexible and basically told me I can jump in on whatever projects seem interesting. It's part time and unpaid, but if all goes well over the summer I have the option of working there during 2L and maybe next summer. Since it's part time I'd either have to find another legal job (maybe RA?) or maybe bartend.

2) I find criminal work interesting and I have no idea if it's something I'd want to do in the future, which is why I applied to the DA's office. I figure, I'll finally know if it's something I'd like to pursue. I've heard that even if you don't end up liking the work it's great experience.

The firm seems to make the most sense, but like I said I'm confused and I've heard so many different things. One of my professors told me to take a clerkship if I get it because you can always work at a firm later. Two different attornies I've spoken to told me to take the DA position.

If the DA's office is in Brooklyn, I've heard horror stories about interning and working there. Nothing on Bronx or Queens offices though.

keg411 wrote:I'd take the DA. Unpaid firm jobs scream looking for free WL/Lexis.

keg411 wrote:I'd take the DA. Unpaid firm jobs scream looking for free WL/Lexis.

romothesavior wrote:

keg411 wrote:I'd take the DA. Unpaid firm jobs scream looking for free WL/Lexis.

How do people even do this? I'm pretty sure our accounts are deactivated in the summer.

romothesavior wrote:The most annoying thing in this whole process is the dead silence from most places. Like, are you people so unprofessional that you can't return my email or phone inquiry and say, "Sorry, we don't have a program" or "Our internships have been filled" or "Thanks, we got your resume and we'll be in touch"? Really annoying.

Desert Fox wrote:

romothesavior wrote:The most annoying thing in this whole process is the dead silence from most places. Like, are you people so unprofessional that you can't return my email or phone inquiry and say, "Sorry, we don't have a program" or "Our internships have been filled" or "Thanks, we got your resume and we'll be in touch"? Really annoying.

Firms were good about this, but other stuff is just awful.

No wonder so many PI people end up in big law anyway. OCI seem a lot easier than this shit.

phonepro wrote:

keg411 wrote:I'd take the DA. Unpaid firm jobs scream looking for free WL/Lexis.

I agree. I'd never work for a firm that was unpaid. A firm that small is probably not even considering hiring you upon graduation.

Although, I might take the judge over DA too. This is a personal preference though. I don't think either one is more "prestigious."

Anonymous User wrote:

phonepro wrote:

keg411 wrote:I'd take the DA. Unpaid firm jobs scream looking for free WL/Lexis.

I agree. I'd never work for a firm that was unpaid. A firm that small is probably not even considering hiring you upon graduation.

Although, I might take the judge over DA too. This is a personal preference though. I don't think either one is more "prestigious."

Thanks for the advice! If I get an offer from the judge I'd probably end up taking it over the DA. Either way, I don't think I can really go wrong.

Anonymous User wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:

phonepro wrote:

keg411 wrote:I'd take the DA. Unpaid firm jobs scream looking for free WL/Lexis.

I agree. I'd never work for a firm that was unpaid. A firm that small is probably not even considering hiring you upon graduation.

Although, I might take the judge over DA too. This is a personal preference though. I don't think either one is more "prestigious."

Thanks for the advice! If I get an offer from the judge I'd probably end up taking it over the DA. Either way, I don't think I can really go wrong.

Honestly, I think interning for a judge (with the exception of a paid firm position) is the best way to spend your first summer. A lot of the DA/gov't positions are filled with busy work and really end up as resume fillers. This is not saying that they're all like this. Some judges work the same way with their interns, but most opportunities are great experiences to hone your writing and research skills and make some connections. Judges know a ton of people personally or know people who people who could get you a call back for OCI etc. This coming from a 2L who was in a similar position and took the judicial internship (for credit) and got a door opened that led to firm job I would never have gotten otherwise.

Desert Fox wrote:

romothesavior wrote:The most annoying thing in this whole process is the dead silence from most places. Like, are you people so unprofessional that you can't return my email or phone inquiry and say, "Sorry, we don't have a program" or "Our internships have been filled" or "Thanks, we got your resume and we'll be in touch"? Really annoying.

Firms were good about this, but other stuff is just awful.

No wonder so many PI people end up in big law anyway. OCI seem a lot easier than this shit.

Anonymous User wrote:I was offered a firm job on the spot after a call back.

Was it wrong of me to accept on the spot?? Or should I have waited a few days?

Anonymous User wrote:I was offered a firm job on the spot after a call back.

Was it wrong of me to accept on the spot?? Or should I have waited a few days?

romothesavior wrote:

Anonymous User wrote:I was offered a firm job on the spot after a call back.

Was it wrong of me to accept on the spot?? Or should I have waited a few days?

No, why would it be? Unless you wanted a few days to wait on other jobs, I don't see much harm in it. Is it a job you really want?

Anonymous User wrote:As I already posted, yesterday I got hired by a boutique DC law firm. The guy I interviewed with said he'd have to check with accounting, but the pay would be in the $xx/hr - $yy/hr range. I don't start until June... when is the appropriate time to ask for a clarification? Also, how to do it without sounding like a soulless money-grubber? I already accepted and will be happy with whatever they give me, it'd just be nice to nail down an exact figure so that I can figure out my summer finances.

romothesavior wrote:The most annoying thing in this whole process is the dead silence from most places. Like, are you people so unprofessional that you can't return my email or phone inquiry and say, "Sorry, we don't have a program" or "Our internships have been filled" or "Thanks, we got your resume and we'll be in touch"? Really annoying.

Anonymous User wrote:what do you guys think about RA versus position with a non-prestigious direct legal services org? the money from the RA position would be nice, but i want to put myself in the best position for OCI next year.

get it to x wrote: If the DA's office is in Brooklyn, I've heard horror stories about interning and working there. Nothing on Bronx or Queens offices though.