Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
awesomedude2012
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:21 am

Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby awesomedude2012 » Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:25 am

No idea if they are authentic:

--LinkRemoved--

Anonymous User
Posts: 273258
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:26 am

Anonymous User wrote:No idea if they are authentic:

--LinkRemoved--


I just summed the acceptances on the spreadsheet and got 391. No idea where this person is getting their data.

YSS
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:08 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby YSS » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:09 am

HLS getting outclassed by CLS

what is this world coming to?

Hoopster
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:51 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby Hoopster » Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:44 pm

Guess I should be thankful I chose Yale over Harvard. :)

User avatar
underdawg
Posts: 1131
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:15 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby underdawg » Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:46 pm

^ great use of anon

DBreslin417
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:43 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby DBreslin417 » Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:23 pm

Anonymous User wrote:HLS getting outclassed by CLS

what is this world coming to?


CLS has consistently led the way (percentage-wise) in Biglaw placement. Doesn't mean CLS is a better school, HLS wins in a lot of other employment categories.

User avatar
BruceWayne
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby BruceWayne » Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:40 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:HLS getting outclassed by CLS

what is this world coming to?


CLS has consistently led the way (percentage-wise) in Biglaw placement. Doesn't mean CLS is a better school, HLS wins in a lot of other employment categories.


Exactly; why are people surprised that a school in NYC is sending more of it's students to NYC firms than a school that isn't in NYC? The real boost that HYS receives over the lower schools are in clerkships, non NYC firm jobs, PI, and government work.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273258
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:46 pm

Northwestern 2009 OCI was 60% of those who attempted OCI. So that will be less than 60%. Probably less than 50%. But definitely more than 40%.

User avatar
Unemployed
Posts: 699
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:35 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby Unemployed » Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:47 pm

When they say 650 participants, does that figure include 3L's and LLM's? If so, the equivalent # at CLS is around 500 people, which would bring down their EIP success rate to ~55% (as opposed to Harvard's 58%).

User avatar
vanwinkle
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby vanwinkle » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:00 pm

There was a lot of anon abuse in this thread. I fixed that. Also:

awesomedude2012 wrote:No idea if they are authentic:

--LinkRemoved--

First post ever? Banned for anon abuse and suspected trolling.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273258
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby Anonymous User » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:08 pm

Unemployed wrote:When they say 650 participants, does that figure include 3L's and LLM's? If so, the equivalent # at CLS is around 500 people, which would bring down their EIP success rate to ~55% (as opposed to Harvard's 58%).

I'm guessing yes on 3Ls and no on LLMs. (There are 284 CLS LLMs, so the equivalent number would be closer to 600ish.)

User avatar
wiseowl
Posts: 1071
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:38 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby wiseowl » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:16 pm

vanwinkle wrote:There was a lot of anon abuse in this thread. I fixed that. Also:

awesomedude2012 wrote:No idea if they are authentic:

--LinkRemoved--

First post ever? Banned for anon abuse and suspected trolling.


you banned someone for linking to a thread on xo with employment data on it?

exams not going well?

ClayDavis
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:11 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby ClayDavis » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:23 pm

wiseowl wrote:
vanwinkle wrote:There was a lot of anon abuse in this thread. I fixed that. Also:

awesomedude2012 wrote:No idea if they are authentic:

--LinkRemoved--

First post ever? Banned for anon abuse and suspected trolling.


you banned someone for linking to a thread on xo with employment data on it?

exams not going well?

titcq

User avatar
vanwinkle
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby vanwinkle » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:25 pm

wiseowl wrote:you banned someone for linking to a thread on xo with employment data on it?

exams not going well?

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=130748

Please read, to avoid being banned yourself. That goes for anyone not familiar with the anon regulation sticky, too. It's stickied in the forum for a reason.

User avatar
DoubleChecks
Posts: 2333
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby DoubleChecks » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:27 pm

this thread is deja vu...

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=139674

Hoopster
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 3:51 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby Hoopster » Wed Dec 08, 2010 12:13 pm

underdawg wrote:^ great use of anon


Thanks for pointing it out. It wasn't intentional. Too many buttons! :)

User avatar
XxSpyKEx
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:48 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby XxSpyKEx » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:06 am

These numbers are :lol:. From Harvard Law --> TTT.

User avatar
BruceWayne
Posts: 2032
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:36 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby BruceWayne » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:09 am

By the way, there's no actual link in the thread, people are just posting comments. Where are people getting this from?

User avatar
XxSpyKEx
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:48 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby XxSpyKEx » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:12 am

BruceWayne wrote:By the way, there's no actual link in the thread, people are just posting comments. Where are people getting this from?


If you read down through some of the comments, it appears that there is some information available to only HLS students (probably requires a private log-in since the informaton was probably ment to be kept confidential).

User avatar
DoubleChecks
Posts: 2333
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby DoubleChecks » Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:13 am

BruceWayne wrote:By the way, there's no actual link in the thread, people are just posting comments. Where are people getting this from?


im not sure on the total # of participants, but ill assume thats true; that includes more than 2Ls you know. the 377 is from HLS data (i think its wrong btw, its 391 as others have stated)

iunno what the whole big fuss is over...HLS class size is ~550...there are ~40 transfers a yr. even if you assume 100% of all 2L students attend EIP (very doubtful), that'd only be 590...so that 650 numbers means very little when comparing data w/ other schools and 2L OCI success rates (its also not offer rates but offers that were accepted)

since 391 is the likely numerator, and even 590 is a highly unlikely denominator (iunno what it should be tho, 540?)...the % comes out very, very differently for 2Ls/2Ls who ACCEPTED offers

09042014
Posts: 18282
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby 09042014 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 7:24 pm

vanwinkle wrote:There was a lot of anon abuse in this thread. I fixed that. Also:

awesomedude2012 wrote:No idea if they are authentic:

--LinkRemoved--

First post ever? Banned for anon abuse and suspected trolling.


Weak Sauce modding right here.

As a harvard student you have harvard access to the harvard OCI data on harvard's servers.

Post the real info.

User avatar
vanwinkle
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Autoadmit posts HLS's 2009 EIP Reuslts (Allegedly)

Postby vanwinkle » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:07 pm

Desert Fox wrote:Weak Sauce modding right here.

Sigh. There was a warning in the thread already, and everything.

Image

Thread is now locked as redundant anyway. Anyone who wants to continue substantive discussion on HLS EIP, including these statistics, can go here: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=139674

Discussions of mod abuse go here: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=132921




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.