SullCrom v. DPW

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Sull Crom v. DPW

SullCrom
22
42%
DPW
30
58%
 
Total votes: 52

Anonymous User
Posts: 273100
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: SullCrom v. DPW

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:24 am

It is, I was the person who took Skadden over the other two a few posts ago and yes it is a crap shoot. Like I said my decision making wasn't 100% rational and at some point you just have to find some personal way to differentiate them and that was my way just because I thought in my head (although apparently mistakenly) about Skadden's M&A/Lit relative strength.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273100
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: SullCrom v. DPW

Postby Anonymous User » Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:35 am

Anonymous User wrote:It is, I was the person who took Skadden over the other two a few posts ago and yes it is a crap shoot. Like I said my decision making wasn't 100% rational and at some point you just have to find some personal way to differentiate them and that was my way just because I thought in my head (although apparently mistakenly) about Skadden's M&A/Lit relative strength.


Looking to do M&A and you chose Skadden ... you're in very good shape my friend! Congrats on the decision.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.