weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
cbs at all three - ip lit - whats the verdict?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
Which offices are these? Weil SV is pretty strong. But otherwise, Irell all the way. Better job security, better IP lit, better exit options, more money.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
How would anyone NOT vote for Irell??? The only reason not to take it would be geography.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
bwv812
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:18 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
.
Last edited by bwv812 on Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
radek
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:05 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
By listing Irell, he made it pretty clear which market he was talking about.bwv812 wrote:Why would you bump this (pretty stupid) question without posting the market?Anonymous User wrote:babump
The ludicrous poll responses are a good indicator of the quality of this thread.
-
bwv812
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:18 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
.
Last edited by bwv812 on Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
OP here; why are you so irritated, if you don't like the preamble to my poll, don't vote on it - geesh.
Locations are - Redwood Shores, San Fran, Los Angeles
Locations are - Redwood Shores, San Fran, Los Angeles
-
bwv812
- Posts: 547
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:18 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
.
Last edited by bwv812 on Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
well, okay, good point.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 428484
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)
dumb question op here; ended up getting an offer from, and choosing Irell. Glad to see it was the popular one.
In my defense, I didn't realize that these firms had significant IP practices in non-California offices, to me - if anyone knows enough about IP lit to vote on this poll, they'd know which offices I'm referring to.
In my defense, I didn't realize that these firms had significant IP practices in non-California offices, to me - if anyone knows enough about IP lit to vote on this poll, they'd know which offices I'm referring to.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
