weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Best for IP litigation

Weil Gotshal
6
24%
MoFo
2
8%
Irell
17
68%
 
Total votes: 25

Anonymous User
Posts: 273574
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:42 am

cbs at all three - ip lit - whats the verdict?

Anonymous User
Posts: 273574
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:44 am

Which offices are these? Weil SV is pretty strong. But otherwise, Irell all the way. Better job security, better IP lit, better exit options, more money.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273574
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:51 am

How would anyone NOT vote for Irell??? The only reason not to take it would be geography.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273574
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Sat Sep 04, 2010 9:17 pm

babump

User avatar
bwv812
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:18 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby bwv812 » Sat Sep 04, 2010 11:11 pm

.
Last edited by bwv812 on Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

radek
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:05 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby radek » Sun Sep 05, 2010 2:16 pm

bwv812 wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:babump

Why would you bump this (pretty stupid) question without posting the market?

The ludicrous poll responses are a good indicator of the quality of this thread.


By listing Irell, he made it pretty clear which market he was talking about.

User avatar
bwv812
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:18 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby bwv812 » Sun Sep 05, 2010 6:34 pm

.
Last edited by bwv812 on Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273574
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:32 pm

OP here; why are you so irritated, if you don't like the preamble to my poll, don't vote on it - geesh.

Locations are - Redwood Shores, San Fran, Los Angeles

User avatar
bwv812
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:18 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby bwv812 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:03 am

.
Last edited by bwv812 on Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273574
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:05 am

well, okay, good point.

Anonymous User
Posts: 273574
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: weil v. mofo v. irell (IP lit)

Postby Anonymous User » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:28 am

dumb question op here; ended up getting an offer from, and choosing Irell. Glad to see it was the popular one.
In my defense, I didn't realize that these firms had significant IP practices in non-California offices, to me - if anyone knows enough about IP lit to vote on this poll, they'd know which offices I'm referring to.




Return to “Legal Employment”

Who is online

The online users are hidden on this forum.