Bozos. Love that word.lawschoolftw wrote:but since the "soft" IP stuff requires no different background that the rest of us bozos
GW OCI Results Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
monkey85
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:07 pm
Re: GW OCI Results
-
androstan
- Posts: 4633
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:07 am
Re: GW OCI Results
That seems extraordinary. How did you do it?Anonymous User wrote:Top 33%. Non IP. Non LR (but Secondary).GW_Law_Student wrote:Bueller?
15 OCI interviews; 5 CBs. 2 mass mail interviews; 0 CBs.
V50 offer, accepted - top choice; withdrew from remainder without receiving offers or rejections from them.
Here is the 2011 GW OCI thread: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=162290
It won't give you the stats you want, but at least you get a flavor of what firms actually give GW students a chance.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
