Page 2 of 2

Re: Skadden NALP Information

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:39 am
by rayiner
Two points: no-offers are not just embarassing, they're expensive. You've already paid the guy $30k, plus expenses. Makes no sense to no-offer more than the occasional screwup if you don't have to.

Also, the 2009 data isn't a good measure. It includes no-offers, which disproportionately hit top schools and which are unlikely to be a problem for C/O 2011 (for above-mentioned reason). If CLS placed 67% through EIW, between clerkships and PI you can expect 50%-ish NLJ250 placement total.

Re: Skadden NALP Information

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:41 am
by youpiiz
rayiner! your assertions are unfounded!! you lack prestige!!!

Re: Skadden NALP Information

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:14 am
by romothesavior
rayiner wrote:Two points: no-offers are not just embarassing, they're expensive. You've already paid the guy $30k, plus expenses. Makes no sense to no-offer more than the occasional screwup if you don't have to.

Also, the 2009 data isn't a good measure. It includes no-offers, which disproportionately hit top schools and which are unlikely to be a problem for C/O 2011 (for above-mentioned reason). If CLS placed 67% through EIW, between clerkships and PI you can expect 50%-ish NLJ250 placement total.
This was my thought as well... that's a lot of money to spend on training and recruiting someone to just let him or her go.

Re: Skadden NALP Information

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:34 am
by thesealocust
nm

Re: Skadden NALP Information

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:41 pm
by bwv812
.