Iowa 2012

(housing, friendships, future exams, all things 2012)
User avatar
coolkatz321
Posts: 436
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:31 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby coolkatz321 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:42 pm

Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:The fact is that it's there. As far as site quality goes, Iowa's is comparable to the old Yahoo Geocities sites. I'm not bashing the school, but that website is a joke.

The site does suck - no argument here - but Madison's virtual tour is hardly the example to use in proving the point.


It's always better to have something than nothing.


That's the point I was trying to make...

Edit: Does not apply to AIDS.
Last edited by coolkatz321 on Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:45 pm

Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:The fact is that it's there. As far as site quality goes, Iowa's is comparable to the old Yahoo Geocities sites. I'm not bashing the school, but that website is a joke.

The site does suck - no argument here - but Madison's virtual tour is hardly the example to use in proving the point.


It's always better to have something than nothing.

It's better to have some AIDS than no AIDS?

I know a man-whore you might want to see.

Anonymous0L

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby Anonymous0L » Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:49 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:The fact is that it's there. As far as site quality goes, Iowa's is comparable to the old Yahoo Geocities sites. I'm not bashing the school, but that website is a joke.

The site does suck - no argument here - but Madison's virtual tour is hardly the example to use in proving the point.


It's always better to have something than nothing.

It's better to have some AIDS than no AIDS?

I know a man-whore you might want to see.


RE: Katz's post above. (DOES NOT APPLY TO HIV/AIDS).

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:51 pm

Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
Jwatson wrote:It's always better to have something than nothing.

It's better to have some AIDS than no AIDS?

I know a man-whore you might want to see.


RE: Katz's post above. (DOES NOT APPLY TO HIV/AIDS).

That post disagrees.

User avatar
Helmholtz
Posts: 4394
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby Helmholtz » Sun Apr 05, 2009 5:53 pm

coolkatz321 wrote:
Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:The fact is that it's there. As far as site quality goes, Iowa's is comparable to the old Yahoo Geocities sites. I'm not bashing the school, but that website is a joke.

The site does suck - no argument here - but Madison's virtual tour is hardly the example to use in proving the point.


It's always better to have something than nothing.


That's the point I was trying to make...

Edit: Does not apply to AIDS.


I know somebody that has a few aides and he's doing fine.

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:03 pm

coolkatz321 wrote:
Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:The fact is that it's there. As far as site quality goes, Iowa's is comparable to the old Yahoo Geocities sites. I'm not bashing the school, but that website is a joke.

The site does suck - no argument here - but Madison's virtual tour is hardly the example to use in proving the point.


It's always better to have something than nothing.


That's the point I was trying to make...

Edit: Does not apply to AIDS.

Your edited post is now self contradictory.

User avatar
coolkatz321
Posts: 436
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:31 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby coolkatz321 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:05 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:
Jwatson wrote:
It's always better to have something than nothing.


That's the point I was trying to make...

Edit: Does not apply to AIDS.

Your edited post is now self contradictory.


Are you aware of the definition of "contradictory"? Clearly, logic is not one of your strong points (and neither is sarcasm)...

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:16 pm

coolkatz321 wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:
Jwatson wrote:
It's always better to have something than nothing.


That's the point I was trying to make...

Edit: Does not apply to AIDS.

Your edited post is now self contradictory.


Are you aware of the definition of "contradictory"? Clearly, logic is not one of your strong points (and neither is sarcasm)...

Contradiction=X is true and X is false.

Your edited post reduces to (x)(Sx --> Bx) and (Ex)(x=a & -Bx)

Dictionary:
x is a variable.
(x) means for all x.
(Ex) means there exists an x.
a is the constant standing for AIDS.
S is the predicate SOMETHING EXISTS.
B is the predicate BETTER TO HAVE.

Logic is one of my strong suits, sir.

You seem to have failed the sarcasm test. My post was intended to make fun of you (as is this post).

User avatar
coolkatz321
Posts: 436
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:31 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby coolkatz321 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:20 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:
That's the point I was trying to make...

Edit: Does not apply to AIDS.

Your edited post is now self contradictory.


Are you aware of the definition of "contradictory"? Clearly, logic is not one of your strong points (and neither is sarcasm)...

Contradiction=X is true and X is false.

Your edited post reduces to (x)(Sx --> Bx) and (Ex)(x=a & -Bx)

Dictionary:
x is a variable.
(x) means for all x.
(Ex) means there exists an x.
a is the constant standing for AIDS.
S is the predicate SOMETHING EXISTS.
B is the predicate BETTER TO HAVE.

Logic is one of my strong suits, sir.

You seem to have failed the sarcasm test. My post was intended to make fun of you (as is this post).


:roll:

Poor Whitty and Crystal...they're going to have to deal with a bitter, nasty ass like yourself.

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:25 pm

coolkatz321 wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
coolkatz321 wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:Your edited post is now self contradictory.


Are you aware of the definition of "contradictory"? Clearly, logic is not one of your strong points (and neither is sarcasm)...

Contradiction=X is true and X is false.

Your edited post reduces to (x)(Sx --> Bx) and (Ex)(x=a & -Bx)

Dictionary:
x is a variable.
(x) means for all x.
(Ex) means there exists an x.
a is the constant standing for AIDS.
S is the predicate SOMETHING EXISTS.
B is the predicate BETTER TO HAVE.

Logic is one of my strong suits, sir.

You seem to have failed the sarcasm test. My post was intended to make fun of you (as is this post).


:roll:

Poor Whitty and Crystal...they're going to have to deal with a bitter, nasty ass like yourself.


This post too.

User avatar
Whitty
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:20 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby Whitty » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:47 pm

What the hell keeps happening to this thread?!

:?

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:50 pm

Whitty wrote:What the hell keeps happening to this thread?!

:?

I'm too weak to not feed the trolls. :oops:

Anonymous0L

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby Anonymous0L » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:54 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
Whitty wrote:What the hell keeps happening to this thread?!

:?

I'm too weak to not feed the trolls. :oops:


Coolkatz321 never trolls. Perhaps you should look into the definition of trolls.

User avatar
coolkatz321
Posts: 436
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:31 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby coolkatz321 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:55 pm

Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
Whitty wrote:What the hell keeps happening to this thread?!

:?

I'm too weak to not feed the trolls. :oops:


Coolkatz321 never trolls. Perhaps you should look into the definition of trolls.


We've already established that he doesn't understand what a dictionary is or, for that matter, how to open/read one.

Anonymous0L

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby Anonymous0L » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:56 pm

coolkatz321 wrote:
Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
Whitty wrote:What the hell keeps happening to this thread?!

:?

I'm too weak to not feed the trolls. :oops:


Coolkatz321 never trolls. Perhaps you should look into the definition of trolls.


We've already established that he doesn't understand what a dictionary is or, for that matter, how to open/read one.

:lol:

User avatar
Whitty
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:20 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby Whitty » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:58 pm

Come on people, can't we all just get along??

Group hug!!! :mrgreen:

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:59 pm

Whitty wrote:Come on people, can't we all just get along??

Group hug!!! :mrgreen:

((((((((()))))))))))))

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:02 pm

coolkatz321 wrote:
Jwatson wrote:
mikeytwoshoes wrote:
Whitty wrote:What the hell keeps happening to this thread?!

:?

I'm too weak to not feed the trolls. :oops:


Coolkatz321 never trolls. Perhaps you should look into the definition of trolls.


We've already established that he doesn't understand what a dictionary is or, for that matter, how to open/read one.

Logicians use "Dictionary" as a reference to delineation of meanings of symbols, variables and predicates.

User avatar
tigerl
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:01 am

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby tigerl » Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:19 pm

mikeytwoshoes wrote:
Whitty wrote:Come on people, can't we all just get along??

Group hug!!! :mrgreen:

((((((((()))))))))))))


Well I guess that's the lawyerly itch in those guys. Frankly I think such verbal agression would be commonplace once one goes to law school.

P.S. Men love talking as if they are in a boxing ring while us women tend to mediate(now I am switching to the gender stereotype mode so...feel free to bash me).

But, yeah, group hug!

User avatar
crystalhawkeye
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:00 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby crystalhawkeye » Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:28 pm

tigerl wrote:P.S. Men love talking as if they are in a boxing ring while us women tend to mediate(now I am switching to the gender stereotype mode so...feel free to bash me).

Bash? Naw. But I will note I want to go into Mediation. So there! Take that gender-role stereotype...

User avatar
mikeytwoshoes
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 11:45 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby mikeytwoshoes » Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:01 pm

I talked to Big Byrd today. He says they have not yet reevaluated the merit money situation. He mentioned two weeks from now as the reevaluation date.

Good Luck

isustudent
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:11 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby isustudent » Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:53 am

Anyone get the email about the luncheon in Des Moines and plan on attending?

User avatar
Whitty
Posts: 280
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:20 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby Whitty » Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:15 pm

isustudent wrote:Anyone get the email about the luncheon in Des Moines and plan on attending?


Nooo :(

Damn, I want lunch invites!

User avatar
crystalhawkeye
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:00 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby crystalhawkeye » Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:25 pm

Whitty wrote:
isustudent wrote:Anyone get the email about the luncheon in Des Moines and plan on attending?


Nooo :(

Damn, I want lunch invites!

Ditto. Even if they are ones to which I cannot attend.

rainmaker614
Posts: 157
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 2:07 pm

Re: Iowa 2012

Postby rainmaker614 » Tue Apr 07, 2009 3:32 pm

crystalhawkeye wrote:
Whitty wrote:
isustudent wrote:Anyone get the email about the luncheon in Des Moines and plan on attending?


Nooo :(

Damn, I want lunch invites!

Ditto. Even if they are ones to which I cannot attend.


They probably only send it to Iowa residents. Crystal, you should have received similar mailings from MSU (to meet at various Cottage Inns lol) which were only sent to in-state admits.




Return to “TLS Class of 2012 Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest