Who did??sch6les wrote:Anyone have the stats here for the University of Toronto? They posted Queens, McGill, and for some reason UofSask, but not Toronto?
The numbers here are all supplied by us individually.
Who did??sch6les wrote:Anyone have the stats here for the University of Toronto? They posted Queens, McGill, and for some reason UofSask, but not Toronto?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
link? i'm not seeing it in the search.23fulltimecowboys wrote:there's a thread on this, and i remember it including a list of the means for maybe 100 UGs
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
This is hilarious, though not surprising.Stanford 164
Williams 164
Pomona College 165
Princeton 165
Swarthmore 165
Yale 165
Harvard 166
nice work, man, thanksYCrevolution wrote:Preparing for merge, *Locator Here*
That says nothing about whether a GPA means more from a top school.HelperMonkey wrote:All undergrad GPAs are created equal lalalallaa
This is hilarious, though not surprising.Stanford 164
Williams 164
Pomona College 165
Princeton 165
Swarthmore 165
Yale 165
Harvard 166
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
You're right. The innate ability to score on average in the top 92% on the LSAT represents nothing about the rigor and intelligence or competitiveness of the student body.goodolgil wrote:
That says nothing about whether a GPA means more from a top school.
Yeah wait, why is this hilarious.HelperMonkey wrote:All undergrad GPAs are created equal lalalallaa
This is hilarious, though not surprising.Stanford 164
Williams 164
Pomona College 165
Princeton 165
Swarthmore 165
Yale 165
Harvard 166
Which has absolutely nothing to with whether it's harder to get a good GPA in a top school (except for classes that use a bell curve, which are rare outside of the sciences).HelperMonkey wrote:You're right. The innate ability to score on average in the top 92% on the LSAT represents nothing about the rigor and intelligence or competitiveness of the student body.goodolgil wrote:
That says nothing about whether a GPA means more from a top school.
That the students at top undergrads also tend to be the most intelligent and highest scoring on the LSAT?crackberry wrote: Yeah wait, why is this hilarious.
You're right... rigor and competitiveness among such an average is clearly non-representative of the ease or difficulty in which a GPA is attainable... especially at places like Stanford where the median GPA is almost identical to many state holes.Which has absolutely nothing to with whether it's harder to get a good GPA in a top school (except for classes that use a bell curve, which are rare outside of the sciences).
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login