The only prolific pro-law poster here is swheat. You look as ridiculous as he does because of your own extremism.solo_lawyer wrote:I have to wonder if certain prolific pro-law school posters here are proprietors of law school prep websites or whether they are clinically delusional
USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans? Forum
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
- Mr. Matlock
- Posts: 1356
- Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:36 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
If you can say that sentence 3 times really fast solo.... hell, I'll give you a job. (No, not a blow... the other one)solo_lawyer wrote:I have to wonder if certain prolific pro-law school posters here are proprietors of law school prep websites or whether they are clinically delusional
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I'm not a prolific pro-law school poster. I just think you guys are too risk averse and too conservative with your expectations. I wouldn't recommend any TTT/TTTT for any amount of money. But a T2 in a big market is not the freaking worst investment in the world. Nobody doing this should expect financial glory any time soon, but I believe most T2 grads have fairly successful careers. Multi-millionaires? No. But middle class? Definitely. Upper middle class? Most likely.Kohinoor wrote:The only prolific pro-law poster here is swheat. You look as ridiculous as he does because of your own extremism.solo_lawyer wrote:I have to wonder if certain prolific pro-law school posters here are proprietors of law school prep websites or whether they are clinically delusional
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Middle-class is technically defined as 35k+ per household. That's not saying much considering the LS investment could exceed 200k.swheat wrote:I'm not a prolific pro-law school poster. I just think you guys are too risk averse and too conservative with your expectations. I wouldn't recommend any TTT/TTTT for any amount of money. But a T2 in a big market is not the freaking worst investment in the world. Nobody doing this should expect financial glory any time soon, but I believe most T2 grads have fairly successful careers. Multi-millionaires? No. But middle class? Definitely. Upper middle class? Most likely.Kohinoor wrote:The only prolific pro-law poster here is swheat. You look as ridiculous as he does because of your own extremism.solo_lawyer wrote:I have to wonder if certain prolific pro-law school posters here are proprietors of law school prep websites or whether they are clinically delusional
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Your own statistics show that the average salaries for lawyers (not just starting salaries) aren't very high and could hardly be considered "upper middle class." Especially when you're servicing $150K in student loan debt over 30 years.swheat wrote:I'm not a prolific pro-law school poster. I just think you guys are too risk averse and too conservative with your expectations. I wouldn't recommend any TTT/TTTT for any amount of money. But a T2 in a big market is not the freaking worst investment in the world. Nobody doing this should expect financial glory any time soon, but I believe most T2 grads have fairly successful careers. Multi-millionaires? No. But middle class? Definitely. Upper middle class? Most likely.Kohinoor wrote:The only prolific pro-law poster here is swheat. You look as ridiculous as he does because of your own extremism.solo_lawyer wrote:I have to wonder if certain prolific pro-law school posters here are proprietors of law school prep websites or whether they are clinically delusional
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Upper middle class? Most likely.Kohinoor wrote:Middle-class is technically defined as 35k+ per household. That's not saying much considering the LS investment could exceed 200k.swheat wrote:I'm not a prolific pro-law school poster. I just think you guys are too risk averse and too conservative with your expectations. I wouldn't recommend any TTT/TTTT for any amount of money. But a T2 in a big market is not the freaking worst investment in the world. Nobody doing this should expect financial glory any time soon, but I believe most T2 grads have fairly successful careers. Multi-millionaires? No. But middle class? Definitely. Upper middle class? Most likely.Kohinoor wrote:The only prolific pro-law poster here is swheat. You look as ridiculous as he does because of your own extremism.solo_lawyer wrote:I have to wonder if certain prolific pro-law school posters here are proprietors of law school prep websites or whether they are clinically delusional
Sigh...here we go again. Straight from the BLS, national averages. Of course these statistics are lies backed by profit motives
Occupation Code Occupation Title (click on the occupation title to view an occupational profile) Employment (1) Median Hourly Mean Hourly Mean Annual (2) Mean RSE (3)
23-0000 Legal Occupations 1,003,270 $34.49 $44.36 $92,270 0.6 %
23-1011 Lawyers 553,690 $53.17 $59.98 $124,750 0.6 %
Make a conservative guess, say the person starts out at 60k per year and never goes above 90k in his/her career. On a dual income you are likely talking 100k+ in yearly income. A household income of $100k+ puts you in the top 20% of Americans.
Struggle with the debt for 10 years or so, then live comfortably.
Amongst a group of such smart people, I feel like I'm speaking Greek sometimes.
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I see a chart with no labeled x or y axes. Also, your conservative guess should be starting at 35k.swheat wrote:Sigh...here we go again. Straight from the BLS, national averages. Of course these statistics are lies backed by profit motives
Occupation Code Occupation Title (click on the occupation title to view an occupational profile) Employment (1) Median Hourly Mean Hourly Mean Annual (2) Mean RSE (3)
23-0000 Legal Occupations 1,003,270 $34.49 $44.36 $92,270 0.6 %
23-1011 Lawyers 553,690 $53.17 $59.98 $124,750 0.6 %
Make a conservative guess, say the person starts out at 60k per year and never goes above 90k in his/her career. On a dual income you are likely talking 100k+ in yearly income. A household income of $100k+ puts you in the top 20% of Americans.
Struggle with the debt for 10 years or so, then live comfortably.
Amongst a group of such smart people, I feel like I'm speaking Greek sometimes.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Yessssssssss....the ol' 35k/no proof argument! I knew it would make a comeback at some point!
In that situation, if it even occurred, wouldn't the person be wise just to do PI, use LRAP, and avoid the 120k in loans that is you guys' reason for rejecting OP's plan?
In that situation, if it even occurred, wouldn't the person be wise just to do PI, use LRAP, and avoid the 120k in loans that is you guys' reason for rejecting OP's plan?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I don't consider $100K to be Upper Middle Class. It wouldn't go far in the true upper middle class suburbs of any major American cities. Especially not with $1,200/month loan payments.
You keep trotting "Median" statistics, but a median is not a useful measure when you have a bi-modal salary distribution.
My argument is not that a law degree equals poverty. There are good legal jobs available (or at least before the economic meltdown). If you get into a decent T30 school, then you'll probably be okay. Starting salaries won't be what you imagine but there are opportunities. My problem is the with the cost of the schools below the T30. I don't mind the public schools like Nebraska or Oklahoma. They're subsidized by the state and serve a valuable purpose.
But private schools below the T30 are not good options for about 90% of their students (except for those with wealthy parents who can finance their education). If they were substantially cheaper (like they were about 15 years ago - law school tuition increases have exceeded inflation and the growth in attorney salaries) and if there were fewer attorneys they would be decent options for maybe the majority of their students. Look at all of the schools dismissed as TTT and you'll see successful alumni who graduated through about the late 1980's. Now there are simply too many attorneys and not enough jobs and law grads are burdened with significant debt.
You keep trotting "Median" statistics, but a median is not a useful measure when you have a bi-modal salary distribution.
My argument is not that a law degree equals poverty. There are good legal jobs available (or at least before the economic meltdown). If you get into a decent T30 school, then you'll probably be okay. Starting salaries won't be what you imagine but there are opportunities. My problem is the with the cost of the schools below the T30. I don't mind the public schools like Nebraska or Oklahoma. They're subsidized by the state and serve a valuable purpose.
But private schools below the T30 are not good options for about 90% of their students (except for those with wealthy parents who can finance their education). If they were substantially cheaper (like they were about 15 years ago - law school tuition increases have exceeded inflation and the growth in attorney salaries) and if there were fewer attorneys they would be decent options for maybe the majority of their students. Look at all of the schools dismissed as TTT and you'll see successful alumni who graduated through about the late 1980's. Now there are simply too many attorneys and not enough jobs and law grads are burdened with significant debt.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Here.Kohinoor wrote:I see a chart with no labeled x or y axes. Also, your conservative guess should be starting at 35k.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_ ... ted_States
Read up on it. It might be an eye-opening experience for someone who only sees the world in biglaw-tinted glasses.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Then you are a moron. That chart I just posted shows only 15.8% of American households earning 100k+. I suggest you read that wikipedia article as well and get some perspective.'04 Grad wrote:I don't consider $100K to be Upper Middle Class.
Dennis Gilbert 2002 definition:
Upper middle class[1] (Top 15%) Highly educated (often with graduate degrees), most commonly salaried, professionals and middle management with large work autonomy
Thompson & Hickey 2005 definition:
Upper middle class[1] (top 15%) Highly educated (often with graduate degrees) professionals & managers with household incomes varying from the high 5-figure range to commonly above $100,000
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
I know that the average American family makes around $40K to $50K depending on where they live and that only a small percentage of Americans make over $100K but that doesn't mean that everyone earning over $100K is upper middle class. A true upper middle class lifestyle requires around $200K depending on the area. In the NE it might need to be even higher. $100K (with law school debt) won't allow for a house in the true upper middle suburbs. It won't be enough for the true upper middle class private schools.swheat wrote:Then you are a moron. That chart I just posted shows only 15.8% of American households earning 100k+. I suggest you read that wikipedia article as well and get some perspective.'04 Grad wrote:I don't consider $100K to be Upper Middle Class.
Dennis Gilbert 2002 definition:
Upper middle class[1] (Top 15%) Highly educated (often with graduate degrees), most commonly salaried, professionals and middle management with large work autonomy
Thompson & Hickey 2005 definition:
Upper middle class[1] (top 15%) Highly educated (often with graduate degrees) professionals & managers with household incomes varying from the high 5-figure range to commonly above $100,000
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Of course there are COL considerations. But check this quote:'04 Grad wrote:
I know that the average American family makes around $40K to $50K depending on where they live and that only a small percentage of Americans make over $100K but that doesn't mean that everyone earning over $100K is upper middle class. A true upper middle class lifestyle requires around $200K depending on the area. In the NE it might need to be even higher. $100K (with law school debt) won't allow for a house in the true upper middle suburbs. It won't be enough for the true upper middle class private schools.
Dunno about you guys but I'd rather be 120k in debt with 100k household income than these guys @50k income. At least you have something to look forward to when the loans are finally paid down.In 2004, California was the most expensive state in the nation[51] and had a median household income of $49,894 (rank 13).[52]
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:54 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
And now we come back to the major flaw in your argument. Is it law school versus $49K a year? What is the median salary in CA for people with college degrees? There are plenty of jobs that pay very well that do not require any kind of a graduate degree. I work with many people who make very good salaries who don't have graduate degrees.swheat wrote:Of course there are COL considerations. But check this quote:'04 Grad wrote:
I know that the average American family makes around $40K to $50K depending on where they live and that only a small percentage of Americans make over $100K but that doesn't mean that everyone earning over $100K is upper middle class. A true upper middle class lifestyle requires around $200K depending on the area. In the NE it might need to be even higher. $100K (with law school debt) won't allow for a house in the true upper middle suburbs. It won't be enough for the true upper middle class private schools.
Dunno about you guys but I'd rather be 120k in debt with 100k household income than these guys @50k income. At least you have something to look forward to when the loans are finally paid down.In 2004, California was the most expensive state in the nation[51] and had a median household income of $49,894 (rank 13).[52]
As for looking forward to when your loans are paid for, if you pay it off over 30 years, you'll be at least 55. That's a long time to "look foward" to anything.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
And now we are back to your "OP should do healthcare instead & stash their money in a MMA @ 2% for a better return" argument.'04 Grad wrote: And now we come back to the major flaw in your argument. Is it law school versus $49K a year? What is the median salary in CA for people with college degrees? There are plenty of jobs that pay very well that do not require any kind of a graduate degree. I work with many people who make very good salaries who don't have graduate degrees.
As for looking forward to when your loans are paid for, if you pay it off over 30 years, you'll be at least 55. That's a long time to "look foward" to anything.
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:13 am
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
You can take the NALP statistics as a reliable source. They're credible, widely reviewed, and cover nearly the entire graduating class nationwide each year (at least on the overall response rate -- for salaries they only seem to cover about 1/2 the market, and that's certainly the better half). What they don't produce, and what would be the single biggest, most useful thing for everyone involved, are per-school breakdowns. But chances we'll ever see that though are about zero. They get the data directly from graduates, so it's not like they need consent from schools to collect it. But they need a source for contact info, and not having that would be a big obstacle. Schools would almost certainly not give it if they thought the results would come back to bite them in the ass.solo_lawyer wrote:one more thing--how is NALP funded? By manna falling from the skies?
The distribution for the Class of 2007 is even uglier than the picture for 2006. And keep in mind that 2007 was the tail end of a record boom for the legal market. Even when things were better than they will probably ever be again for new lawyers, the market was still lousy as hell for most. Of those that even managed to get jobs, 42% are in that big fat lower peak between $40-60k. With this fall and the next few years looking like the worst hiring climate for lawyers in thirty or forty years, it won't be long before people are wishing for the good old days when it was only that bad.
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:13 am
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Here are some numbers from the Class of 2007 National Summary Report.solo_lawyer wrote:one more thing--how is NALP funded? By manna falling from the skies?
Total graduates: 43,518
Full-time job, bar passage required: 29,978 (0.69)
Employed at graduation: 23,419 (0.54)
Employed out of state: 12,569 (0.29)
Got job through --
Fall OCI: 6,859 (0.16)
Mass mailing: 6,777 (0.16)
Referral: 4,679 (0.11)
Job posting: 4,253 (0.10)
Return to prior job: 1,975 (0.05)
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Wonder how the other 42% got their jobssnotrocket wrote:Here are some numbers from the Class of 2007 National Summary Report.solo_lawyer wrote:one more thing--how is NALP funded? By manna falling from the skies?
Total graduates: 43,518
Full-time job, bar passage required: 29,978 (0.69)
Employed at graduation: 23,419 (0.54)
Employed out of state: 12,569 (0.29)
Got job through --
Fall OCI: 6,859 (0.16)
Mass mailing: 6,777 (0.16)
Referral: 4,679 (0.11)
Job posting: 4,253 (0.10)
Return to prior job: 1,975 (0.05)
There's your craigslist 04 Grad!! Whopping 10%. I wonder if that includes job postings on company boards as well as craigslist. If so I would bet that pushes the craigslist total down even further.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Nice link snotrocket.
http://www.nalp.org/uploads/1229_natlsu ... evised.pdf
It shows "Commercial Internet Site" (ie. CRAIGSLIST) as accounting for 2-3% of responses to method used in finding a job.
"Fall OCI" (22.6) + "Return to Prior Job"(6.5) + Referral (15.4) + Spring OCI (1.6) + Self-intiated/letter (22.3)
Adds up to 58.4% of the responses. Looks like vindication for my notion that most jobs are found through OCI and networking.
http://www.nalp.org/uploads/1229_natlsu ... evised.pdf
It shows "Commercial Internet Site" (ie. CRAIGSLIST) as accounting for 2-3% of responses to method used in finding a job.
"Fall OCI" (22.6) + "Return to Prior Job"(6.5) + Referral (15.4) + Spring OCI (1.6) + Self-intiated/letter (22.3)
Adds up to 58.4% of the responses. Looks like vindication for my notion that most jobs are found through OCI and networking.
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
If the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports 27% of grads as solos and NALP reports 2.8%, something is being missed somewhere.swheat wrote:Nice link snotrocket.
http://www.nalp.org/uploads/1229_natlsu ... evised.pdf
It shows "Commercial Internet Site" (ie. CRAIGSLIST) as accounting for 2-3% of responses to method used in finding a job.
"Fall OCI" (22.6) + "Return to Prior Job"(6.5) + Referral (15.4) + Spring OCI (1.6) + Self-intiated/letter (22.3)
Adds up to 58.4% of the responses. Looks like vindication for my notion that most jobs are found through OCI and networking.
- General Tso
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 6:51 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
BLS reports 27% of new grads working solo, or 27% of all lawyers working solo? Because there's a huge difference.Kohinoor wrote:If the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports 27% of grads as solos and NALP reports 2.8%, something is being missed somewhere.swheat wrote:Nice link snotrocket.
http://www.nalp.org/uploads/1229_natlsu ... evised.pdf
It shows "Commercial Internet Site" (ie. CRAIGSLIST) as accounting for 2-3% of responses to method used in finding a job.
"Fall OCI" (22.6) + "Return to Prior Job"(6.5) + Referral (15.4) + Spring OCI (1.6) + Self-intiated/letter (22.3)
Adds up to 58.4% of the responses. Looks like vindication for my notion that most jobs are found through OCI and networking.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:13 am
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Very few new graduates will or can start a solo practice straight out of school. It makes sense that the percentage of solos overall is noticeably higher, since most people that do that will strike out on their own after a few years of experience (frustration) working for someone else.Kohinoor wrote:If the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports 27% of grads as solos and NALP reports 2.8%, something is being missed somewhere.
- Cramble
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:47 pm
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:13 am
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
How new graduates find jobs.
Total Graduates: 43,518
Unknown / Unemployed: 15,518 (0.357)
Resume Spam --
Mass Mailing: 6,777 (0.156)
Job Posting: 4,253 (0.098)
Internet: 780 (0.018)
TOTAL: 11,810 (0.27)
OCI --
Fall OCI: 6,859 (0.158)
Job Fair: 834 (0.019)
Spring OCI: 497 (0.011)
TOTAL: 8,190 (0.188)
Networking --
Referral: 4,679
Prior Job: 1,975
TOTAL: 6,654 (0.152)
Temp Agency: 513 (0.012)
Solo Practice: 833 (0.019)
So, less than 1 in 5 get jobs through OCI, about 1/4 by mass resume spam, 15% through networking, and the biggest chunk -- 36% -- are flipping burgers or doing nothing. Again, keep in mind that this was in the leading year of the decade, at the tail end of a huge boom in demand for legal services, and in a hiring market that likely none of us will see again for the rest of our careers.
Total Graduates: 43,518
Unknown / Unemployed: 15,518 (0.357)
Resume Spam --
Mass Mailing: 6,777 (0.156)
Job Posting: 4,253 (0.098)
Internet: 780 (0.018)
TOTAL: 11,810 (0.27)
OCI --
Fall OCI: 6,859 (0.158)
Job Fair: 834 (0.019)
Spring OCI: 497 (0.011)
TOTAL: 8,190 (0.188)
Networking --
Referral: 4,679
Prior Job: 1,975
TOTAL: 6,654 (0.152)
Temp Agency: 513 (0.012)
Solo Practice: 833 (0.019)
So, less than 1 in 5 get jobs through OCI, about 1/4 by mass resume spam, 15% through networking, and the biggest chunk -- 36% -- are flipping burgers or doing nothing. Again, keep in mind that this was in the leading year of the decade, at the tail end of a huge boom in demand for legal services, and in a hiring market that likely none of us will see again for the rest of our careers.
Last edited by snotrocket on Sat May 02, 2009 8:26 am, edited 5 times in total.
- badfish
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:53 pm
Re: USF - worth it for $120,000 in loans?
Sorry, the risk is just way too high.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login