seriously, what's a bad GPA?? Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
Mosel

New
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:50 pm

Post by Mosel » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:08 pm

Opera, I also agree with your other point.

My science classes were my best marks.

And music majors are highly underestimated. Counterpoint and Jazz theory could rival rocket science in terms of analytical reasoning.

No respect; no respect at all! :D

lollypotter

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:24 am

Post by lollypotter » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:19 pm

And music majors are highly underestimated.

I'm surprised - people were usually really impressed with music majors at my college. Most of them were maths gods as well.

littleone

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:59 am

Post by littleone » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:26 pm

I was a biology major, so I'm admittedly biased, but please don't disparage science majors based on a few introductory science classes that were designed to help students fill distribution requirements and are not reflective of the major curriculum. I was far from a 4.0, but those that I knew in my major that did have such grades were brilliant and had an amazing work ethic. I didn't take many humanities courses, so I don't feel qualified to comment on how difficult those classes are, but science majors definitely do not have it easy.

You're right, though, that a lot of science majors don't write that well :)

User avatar
OperaAttorney

Silver
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:48 pm

Post by OperaAttorney » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:27 pm

I think it's because some music programs are more performance-based. While performance is required at my school, the undergraduate music degree is more academic, focusing on scholarship and theory (and composition, for the composers). My professors are some of the best writers I know; they assign grades based on content AND style AND grammar. "It's for the sake of high art," they say. :0)LOL

patentlaw

New
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:29 am

Post by patentlaw » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:27 pm

I'm a poli-sci major, and I realize there are programs out there that have grade inflation. But can this really mean that a GPA in a such a major can never be indicative of excellence?
I have to admit that I have a bias when I look at liberal arts GPAs. In my undergrad I think the average liberal arts student had somewhere around a 3.6 and there was no curve, my engineering degree courses were curved to a 2.7. That's not to say that the engineer/hard science majors would do well in those liberal arts courses, but it does say that the average student in those majors have wildly different GPAs.

edited for clarity
Last edited by patentlaw on Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
brokendowncar

Bronze
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:54 pm

Post by brokendowncar » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:28 pm

And the GPA thing?? You're right about that, too. And, on a personal note, I find a 4.0 in English more impressive than a 4.0 in Biology. I took over a year's worth of Biology as a pre-med student, and those were some of the easiest A's I ever got! LOL Smile Plus, most of the science majors I know don't write well.
Comparing first year bio courses to upper level courses in any major isn't exactly a fair comparison. If you had aced organic chemistry or an upper level materials engineering course, then you would have a decent basis for comparison.

I realize your obvious response is going to be that I have not taken upper level music courses, and of course you are correct. However, I have taken upper level English classes and laughed my way through them. I have also lived with accounting, psych, phys ed, etc majors and watched as they did almost nothing for their classes and walked away with a 3.5. These kids aren't that smart, its just generally easier.

User avatar
OperaAttorney

Silver
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:48 pm

Post by OperaAttorney » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:31 pm

Comparing first year bio courses to upper level courses in any major isn't exactly a fair comparison. If you had aced organic chemistry or an upper level materials engineering course, then you would have a decent basis for comparison.
Did you read my remark about GENETICS, an upper-division bio course? I stated that it would take God for me to ace that sucker. And, please don't remind me of O-Chem! I felt sorry for all my pre-med friends who barely passed it. Most of them are in med school now, and those B's in O-Chem no longer matter.

lollypotter

New
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:24 am

Post by lollypotter » Fri Sep 21, 2007 12:39 pm

The depressing thing is that it is exactly the opposite for liberal arts and science grades in my uni and my liberal arts grades will be discounted all the same...
In my undergrad I think the average liberal arts student had somewhere around a 3.6 and there was no curve, my engineering degree courses were curved to a 2.7
I'm sorry, but that's just unfair.

User avatar
Mosel

New
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:50 pm

Post by Mosel » Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:07 pm

hm...I don't think we were trying to imply that science is an easy major. Furthermore, I feel like we're all trying to force this conversation into a situation where one side must be triumphant. If anything, I'm calling for equality. I don't think I need testament from anyone that upper-lever physics/sciences are hard as hell. I know they would be.

At the same time, the 400 and 500 level classes in my major were definitely harder than anything I've ever attempted, and I switched between a few majors, (I was a sound engineering major for a while; naturally, I didn't go all the way to the 500's, so I'm not drawing any conclusions from this, I've no basis for comparison).

Also, I think Opera and I saying that our science courses were our easiest wasn't intended as any kind of argument. I think we were just shooting the shit that for us--personally--our brains are more suited to those skills than other skills.

Music majors are definitely underestimated.


My ultimate point was simply that I find it unfortunate that because the sciences are often curved to lower grades, and because it is impossible for the liberal arts to escape having some degree of subjectivity, the liberal arts GPA is automatically seen as weaker. I think there is some ground for this view, but it is definitely not without bound.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
brokendowncar

Bronze
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:54 pm

Post by brokendowncar » Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:13 pm

Did you read my remark about GENETICS, an upper-division bio course? I stated that it would take God for me to ace that sucker. And, please don't remind me of O-Chem! I felt sorry for all my pre-med friends who barely passed it. Most of them are in med school now, and those B's in O-Chem no longer matter.
With this being true, I don't understand how you can still have more respect for a 4.0 in English than a 4.0 in the Sciences. I have never heard anyone talk about a particular English class that everyone struggled with.

Also, I understand you're being very friendly in the discussion, and I am probably coming across a little harsh. I apologize for that. I just happen to have a biochemistry test this week that is making me want to quit school. Meanwhile, my roommate had a "huge accounting test" that he had to spend three hours studying for and make note cards.
Last edited by brokendowncar on Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
M20009

Bronze
Posts: 246
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Post by M20009 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:15 pm

I have never heard anyone talk about a particular English class that everyone struggled with.
Well, I have never heard anyone talk about a particular science class that everyone struggled with.

English gets capitalized but science doesn't. That should tell you enough.

User avatar
brokendowncar

Bronze
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 12:54 pm

Post by brokendowncar » Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:20 pm

Are you serious? You mean you've never heard of the horrors of p chem and organic? How about calculus based physics and statics for engineers? Sure, some people get A's in these classes with relatively little work, but they are few are far between.

User avatar
M20009

Bronze
Posts: 246
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 4:21 pm

Post by M20009 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:25 pm

Yes I'm serious. But I've never hung around, talked with, or lived with anyone who majored in a hard science. That said, I stand by my statement.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


M2008

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:27 am

Post by M2008 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 3:45 pm

I've never hung around, talked with, or lived with anyone who majored in a hard science. That said, I stand by my statement.
Um, wow. OK, I guess.

Just to throw my own experience out there, most of the introductory physics classes at my university were offered at 3 difficulty levels - the first was open to everyone but was taken pretty much exclusively by physics majors and engineers.

The easier level would fulfill general science requirements for liberal arts majors, but not would not fulfill the physics requirements for physics majors or most engineers.

The easiest level was offered exclusively for architects, as apparently most of them would not be able to pass a class with the more difficult material. (Luckily it's the civil engineers who make sure the building doesn't collapse.)

So, at least in this case, an engineer's A > English major's A > Architect's A.

Locke181

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:36 am

Post by Locke181 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:29 pm

a philosophy major is the hardest to get 3.5 or higher. the classes are subjective and getting a B is easy. however getting an A in epistemeology or symbolic logic II harder than accounting or organizational behavior

p.s try getting a communciations major in a liberally slanted school when you are a liberatrian and the teacher gives u points off b/c ur not a radical far left lesbian activist.

User avatar
kn6542

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:12 pm

Post by kn6542 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:38 pm

the classes are subjective and getting a B is easy. however getting an A in epistemeology or symbolic logic II harder than accounting or organizational behavior
Philosophy classes should not be "subjective", whether it is a survey/history course, or an analytical course.
I think the second statement depends on the prof in the respective courses and the talents of the student.

User avatar
Mosel

New
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:50 pm

Post by Mosel » Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:45 pm

I agree ^^.

The content might be subjective in nature, but performance is objective.

In my higher classes we would cover very 'cushy' material, and many students thought that implied the course was subjective and that grading would follow suit. However, your performance is evaluated based on your ability to take subjective material and understand it, manipulate, and extrapolate it in relation to the fundamentals of theory. So it's actually very objective and right-or-wrong.

or as I like to say, rightorwrong.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
OperaAttorney

Silver
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:48 pm

Post by OperaAttorney » Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:59 pm

Yep.

But a lot of people seem to hate epistemology. (I haven't taken it yet :) LOL Is my GPA worth the risk, guys???). Formal logic worked out just fine though.
Last edited by OperaAttorney on Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
OperaAttorney

Silver
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:48 pm

Post by OperaAttorney » Fri Sep 21, 2007 8:03 pm

To the philosophy majors:

What phil courses are you taking this semester/quarter? I'm curious.

User avatar
NiftyDolphin

New
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 10:15 pm

Post by NiftyDolphin » Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:54 am

My first day of class the dean addressed us and explained that, though he was sorry, no one would be receiving a 4.0 in a class. To my knowledge, he was good on his word. Of the 200 people in my class--though I don't know every one of them--I know not a single one who had anything above a 3.7, and many of these people were among the top of the class.
I never understood how someone could see not giving out 4.0 as a good idea. If its grade inflation your guarding against- stop inflating grades!

User avatar
kn6542

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:12 pm

Post by kn6542 » Sat Sep 22, 2007 1:58 am

Is my GPA worth the risk, guys???)
Uh..don't you need it for your major?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Hitachi

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:38 pm

Post by Hitachi » Sat Sep 22, 2007 4:48 am

Chemical engineering is the easiest major: https://webfiles.berkeley.edu/~zhangyuxi/transcript.htm

User avatar
OperaAttorney

Silver
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:48 pm

Post by OperaAttorney » Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:40 am

Uh..don't you need it for your major?
I just checked. I don't. YAY! I have my mind set on other electives, such as Phil of Language, Phil of Law, Phil of Psychology, Bioethics, Phil of Agency, Phil of Religion, and Justice.
Last edited by OperaAttorney on Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
gravity

New
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:35 pm

Post by gravity » Sat Sep 22, 2007 7:20 am

wow nice transcript

User avatar
thisabyssisbliss

New
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:29 pm

Post by thisabyssisbliss » Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:13 am

philosophy of mind is pretty interesting.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”