Pacific Northwest Law Schools
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:41 am
Hello everyone!
I am a prospective law student from Washington state who is currently living in Tokyo, teaching English. I applied to 6 law schools this year and have received a couple of admission offers, and am waiting on a few more. So far, I have been accepted to Seattle University and Willamette University. My problem is this: Seattle U did not offer me a scholarship, whereas Willamette offered me a 60% scholarship. While I know that Seattle is higher ranked according to US News, I could well end up paying $45,000 more over the course of three years to attend Seattle instead of Willamette. Any advice? Some other considerations include employment prospects for my Japanese fiancee who works in the video game industry (Seattle is definitely better than Salem on this point.) I am still not sure what area of law I'd like to focus on, either International Business geared towards Japan and East Asia (to take advantage of my Japanese language skills, East Asian history degree, and 3 years of living here) or Politics and Government (for which Willamette may be better given it is an intimate law school in a small state capital.) I am still hoping to get accepted to the University of Washington Law School, but I figure I have a low chance of getting in given my GPA and LSAT score. So for now, I would greatly appreciate any thoughts concerning my present predicament of Seattle vs. Willamette.
I have enjoyed reading the postings on this forum, and Ken, I applaud your overwhelmingly postive feedback and well-articulated advice. However, there are a few points I would like to make concerning some of the site.
1) On the whole, many of these postings constitute little more than an academic circle-jerk, with most members merely stroking their GPAs and LSATs for the ooohs and ahhhs of others.
2) Generally, anonymous internet postings tend towards exaggeration, and I believe the personal statistics on this forum are probably about as realistic as those that would be found on a gay dating site. I never knew there were so many people out there with 170 LSATs, 3.95 GPAs, and no clues about law schools. More likely, there are a lot of smartass 14 year olds having a laugh making insecure white middle class college kids squirm.
3) Way too many people out there take the LSAT way too seriously. If you really believe that you are only as intelligent as the Law School Admissions Council says you are then I don't want you as my advocate! The LSAT scoring system fails to acknowledge accumulated knowledge, work and life experience, memory, and writing and speaking skills. I regard the LSAT as roughly equivalent to one's 'intellectual penis size,' that is, a rough indicator of performance at best. Besides, if you spend too much time fretting about how 'big' your LSAT score is, and how it compares to the other kids in the law school shower room, you'll probably miss a lot of opportunites to put what you have to it's full potential!
To close, I'd like to say, good luck to everyone out there on getting in to law school and excelling there! Don't worry too much about your paper credentials, try to focus on the big picture: empowering yourselves to help others. Even if you graduate from the worst law school in the U.S., you will still be better off than 98% of people in the rest of the world, and capable of making real changes in the lives of others. Try to remember what Mark Twain said: 'I've never let my schooling interfere with my education.' So again, good luck, and I look forward to hearing your replies and advice.
I am a prospective law student from Washington state who is currently living in Tokyo, teaching English. I applied to 6 law schools this year and have received a couple of admission offers, and am waiting on a few more. So far, I have been accepted to Seattle University and Willamette University. My problem is this: Seattle U did not offer me a scholarship, whereas Willamette offered me a 60% scholarship. While I know that Seattle is higher ranked according to US News, I could well end up paying $45,000 more over the course of three years to attend Seattle instead of Willamette. Any advice? Some other considerations include employment prospects for my Japanese fiancee who works in the video game industry (Seattle is definitely better than Salem on this point.) I am still not sure what area of law I'd like to focus on, either International Business geared towards Japan and East Asia (to take advantage of my Japanese language skills, East Asian history degree, and 3 years of living here) or Politics and Government (for which Willamette may be better given it is an intimate law school in a small state capital.) I am still hoping to get accepted to the University of Washington Law School, but I figure I have a low chance of getting in given my GPA and LSAT score. So for now, I would greatly appreciate any thoughts concerning my present predicament of Seattle vs. Willamette.
I have enjoyed reading the postings on this forum, and Ken, I applaud your overwhelmingly postive feedback and well-articulated advice. However, there are a few points I would like to make concerning some of the site.
1) On the whole, many of these postings constitute little more than an academic circle-jerk, with most members merely stroking their GPAs and LSATs for the ooohs and ahhhs of others.
2) Generally, anonymous internet postings tend towards exaggeration, and I believe the personal statistics on this forum are probably about as realistic as those that would be found on a gay dating site. I never knew there were so many people out there with 170 LSATs, 3.95 GPAs, and no clues about law schools. More likely, there are a lot of smartass 14 year olds having a laugh making insecure white middle class college kids squirm.
3) Way too many people out there take the LSAT way too seriously. If you really believe that you are only as intelligent as the Law School Admissions Council says you are then I don't want you as my advocate! The LSAT scoring system fails to acknowledge accumulated knowledge, work and life experience, memory, and writing and speaking skills. I regard the LSAT as roughly equivalent to one's 'intellectual penis size,' that is, a rough indicator of performance at best. Besides, if you spend too much time fretting about how 'big' your LSAT score is, and how it compares to the other kids in the law school shower room, you'll probably miss a lot of opportunites to put what you have to it's full potential!
To close, I'd like to say, good luck to everyone out there on getting in to law school and excelling there! Don't worry too much about your paper credentials, try to focus on the big picture: empowering yourselves to help others. Even if you graduate from the worst law school in the U.S., you will still be better off than 98% of people in the rest of the world, and capable of making real changes in the lives of others. Try to remember what Mark Twain said: 'I've never let my schooling interfere with my education.' So again, good luck, and I look forward to hearing your replies and advice.