how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
anpaking

New
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2018 1:47 am

how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

Postby anpaking » Wed Oct 17, 2018 6:41 pm

Is it a mark against an applicant to a top law school to hold a relatively unprestigious job for a year or two before law school?

I'm thinking about being a wilderness therapy field mentor, which involves guiding and managing clients in an extended backpacking trip in the wilderness and playing the role of mentor to some extent for people in the 14-22 age range who are struggling psychologically or behaviorally. The actual therapeutic work would not be done by me, of course, but by therapists who drive out to the field every week and hold therapy sessions with the clients.

It's interesting, unique work, but the hiring standards aren't super high.

Are t-14 schools expecting something more prestigious?

User avatar
totesTheGoat

Moderator
Posts: 849
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 1:32 pm

Re: how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

Postby totesTheGoat » Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:25 am

I'm pretty sure they're not gonna hold that job against you. In fact, it sounds like the makings for a damned good PS.

Prestige is very much overrated in law school admissions (it's also overrated in legal hiring). Worry less about prestige and more about doing what you want with your life.

albanach

Gold
Posts: 1622
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:05 pm

Re: how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

Postby albanach » Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:58 am

My understanding is that there's a strong desire to create a class with diverse experiences. Many adcomms could easily fill a class with a mixture of K-JDs and folk with a couple of year's experience on the hill. But the entire class would lose out as a result because the Socratic method benefits from differing opinions.

So, as totes says, you could turn this to your advantage. The entry qualifications aren't what's important, rather it's how you portray what you did, how you contributed and what you gained from the experience.

da.goat

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:05 pm

Re: how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

Postby da.goat » Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:13 am

Some of the most successful law students at my T13 were bartenders/group exercise teachers/retail workers for a few years between undergrad and law school. As your career services office will eventually tell you, never undervalue a job that lets you work directly with (sometimes difficult) people, since it'll make you much more well rounded socially. Employers know that top law school students are generally all smart, but they also want to know you're not a social weirdo, and work history like this is a good sign in your favor.

BarelyConcealedRage

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 7:25 pm

Re: how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

Postby BarelyConcealedRage » Mon Oct 22, 2018 1:10 pm

albanach wrote:My understanding is that there's a strong desire to create a class with diverse experiences. Many adcomms could easily fill a class with a mixture of K-JDs and folk with a couple of year's experience on the hill. But the entire class would lose out as a result because the Socratic method benefits from differing opinions.

So, as totes says, you could turn this to your advantage. The entry qualifications aren't what's important, rather it's how you portray what you did, how you contributed and what you gained from the experience.

Is there any evidence that is actually true? As far as I can tell the push for "diversity" is pretty much transparently racial. Stuff like OPs "life experiences" only matter as an edge case.

It definitly wont be a negative though.

QContinuum

Moderator
Posts: 753
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 9:52 am

Re: how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

Postby QContinuum » Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:30 pm

BarelyConcealedRage wrote:
albanach wrote:My understanding is that there's a strong desire to create a class with diverse experiences. Many adcomms could easily fill a class with a mixture of K-JDs and folk with a couple of year's experience on the hill. But the entire class would lose out as a result because the Socratic method benefits from differing opinions.

So, as totes says, you could turn this to your advantage. The entry qualifications aren't what's important, rather it's how you portray what you did, how you contributed and what you gained from the experience.

Is there any evidence that is actually true? As far as I can tell the push for "diversity" is pretty much transparently racial. Stuff like OPs "life experiences" only matter as an edge case.

It definitly wont be a negative though.


My impression is that law school administrators love touting students who've done unusual things, whether it's living in a yurt in the Himalayas or being a professional ballet dancer or operating a tourist hotspot in Ecuador. (These are obviously all made-up examples, but you get the drift.) Wilderness therapy, IMO, would likely be unique enough to fit in this realm.

(Bartenders/retail workers wouldn't, but those jobs wouldn't hurt either - they just probably wouldn't give the applicant any discernible boost, standing alone (unless the applicant's able to spin their bartending/retail experience into a compelling Why Law).)

abl

Silver
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:07 pm

Re: how important is the prestige of your work experience after undergrad to law school admissions?

Postby abl » Tue Oct 23, 2018 12:01 am

My sense is that interesting almost always trumps prestigious. This sounds pretty interesting, so I wouldn't worry.



Return to “Law School Admissions Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot] and 12 guests