2018 USNWR Rankings

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
rpupkin

Platinum
Posts: 5658
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby rpupkin » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:10 pm

michlaw wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
Nagster5 wrote:If the "T" distinction is for schools who have never been ranked lower, then Cornell can't be in the T13, since it was ranked 14 in 2012. So it's the T12.


It can't be T12 either since Berkeley has been ranked 13th before, and it can't be T11 because Northwestern and Duke (tied at 10) have been ranked above 11 before, and it can't be T9 because Michigan has been ranked above 9 before.. So what is it.. T8 now? Has virginia or penn been outside the top 8? If so, then T6? But chicago has been outside top 6.. So T5?


Penn has been ranked 12th at least twice. Not sure about UVA, but I'm sure it's been lower than #8 multiple times.


Ok then it can't be T5 cause NYU has been outside T5. It can't be T4 since Columbia just fell out of T4. So we're down to T3. Has HYS ever been out of T3?

HLS was fifth in 1990.
ETA: And I think SLS was fourth at least once.


Michigan was 3rd in 1987.

UT was 11th that same year.

User avatar
PrezRand

Gold
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby PrezRand » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:12 pm

Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits

LurkerTurnedMember

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:31 am

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby LurkerTurnedMember » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:12 pm

rpupkin wrote:
LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
Nagster5 wrote:If the "T" distinction is for schools who have never been ranked lower, then Cornell can't be in the T13, since it was ranked 14 in 2012. So it's the T12.


It can't be T12 either since Berkeley has been ranked 13th before, and it can't be T11 because Northwestern and Duke (tied at 10) have been ranked above 11 before, and it can't be T9 because Michigan has been ranked above 9 before.. So what is it.. T8 now? Has virginia or penn been outside the top 8? If so, then T6? But chicago has been outside top 6.. So T5?


Penn has been ranked 12th at least twice. Not sure about UVA, but I'm sure it's been lower than #8 multiple times.


Ok then it can't be T5 cause NYU has been outside T5. It can't be T4 since Columbia just fell out of T4. So we're down to T3. Has HYS ever been out of T3?

HLS was fifth in 1990.
ETA: And I think SLS was fourth at least once.


Damn. Wtf. Georgetown obliterated everything. There's no "T" anymore. There's just.... Yale. (Unless it fell below 1 at some point, then USNWR rankings implode and disappear into the shadow realm). Wow. Who knew Georgetown could defeat USNWR..

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17152
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Tiago Splitter » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:16 pm

T1
TTT
Penn
Arizona Summit

michlaw

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 8:49 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby michlaw » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:18 pm

LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
rpupkin wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
Nagster5 wrote:If the "T" distinction is for schools who have never been ranked lower, then Cornell can't be in the T13, since it was ranked 14 in 2012. So it's the T12.


It can't be T12 either since Berkeley has been ranked 13th before, and it can't be T11 because Northwestern and Duke (tied at 10) have been ranked above 11 before, and it can't be T9 because Michigan has been ranked above 9 before.. So what is it.. T8 now? Has virginia or penn been outside the top 8? If so, then T6? But chicago has been outside top 6.. So T5?


Penn has been ranked 12th at least twice. Not sure about UVA, but I'm sure it's been lower than #8 multiple times.


Ok then it can't be T5 cause NYU has been outside T5. It can't be T4 since Columbia just fell out of T4. So we're down to T3. Has HYS ever been out of T3?

HLS was fifth in 1990.
ETA: And I think SLS was fourth at least once.


Damn. Wtf. Georgetown obliterated everything. There's no "T" anymore. There's just.... Yale. (Unless it fell below 1 at some point, then USNWR rankings implode and disappear into the shadow realm). Wow. Who knew Georgetown could defeat USNWR..


In 1987 Yale and Harvard were tied for 1st. So were they both 1.5 the average of 1st and 2nd? Or were they both #1?

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Moneytrees » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:20 pm

PrezRand wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits


Don't see why you would replace the UCs with UT since UCSD and UCSB are probably a bit ahead of it (UG and as research institutions), but other than that it's a good list. Had totally forgotten about Wake Forest.

LurkerTurnedMember

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:31 am

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby LurkerTurnedMember » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:25 pm

In 1987 Yale and Harvard were tied for 1st. So were they both 1.5 the average of 1st and 2nd? Or were they both #1?


Where are u getting the previous rankings? Please provide a link.

User avatar
bearsfan23

Gold
Posts: 1755
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby bearsfan23 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:26 pm

Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits


Don't see why you would replace the UCs with UT since UCSD and UCSB are probably a bit ahead of it (UG and as research institutions), but other than that it's a good list. Had totally forgotten about Wake Forest.


How is Chicago not a Tier 1 undergrad?

michlaw

Bronze
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 8:49 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby michlaw » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:40 pm

LurkerTurnedMember wrote:
In 1987 Yale and Harvard were tied for 1st. So were they both 1.5 the average of 1st and 2nd? Or were they both #1?


Where are u getting the previous rankings? Please provide a link.


http://www.prelawhandbook.com/law_schoo ... _1987_1999

User avatar
PrezRand

Gold
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby PrezRand » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:55 pm

Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits


Don't see why you would replace the UCs with UT since UCSD and UCSB are probably a bit ahead of it (UG and as research institutions), but other than that it's a good list. Had totally forgotten about Wake Forest.

UT has more recognized programs than UCSD and UCSB. It is definitely closer to UCLA/Michigan/Berkeley/UVA than people admit.

candidlatke

Bronze
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 3:52 am

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby candidlatke » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:17 pm

HYPSM
Chicago/Columbia/Penn/top LAC's
Duke/Dartmouth/Cornell/Brown/Georgetown/John Hopkins
Berkeley/UVA/UMich/WUSTL/Vanderbilt/Rice/CMU/Northwestern
UT/UCLA/UNC/the better known flagships/BC/average private schools/etc.
Lesser known state schools like the other UC's/William Mary/etc.

Also, the placement power of the non Berkeley/UCLA UC's is really shitty.
MBB doesn't recruit at any of the UC's besides Berkeley and a tiny amount at UCLA, and the top investment banks are similarly represented (though they take a tiny few. Have seen a few friends from UCSD go to JP Morgan in SF and a few from UCSB as well)
Google/Facebook/Amazon/etc. you have maybe like 10 kids a year going to there per lesser UC.
Apparently UCI reported something like a 15% full time employment rate recently. Friend linked me this: http://www.oir.uci.edu/files/surveys/Se ... esults.pdf
And mind you, UCI's ranked higher than SD at this point on that ranking people are putting so much emphasis on, right below UCSB which are next up from UCLA/Berkeley in case you were wondering.

Also people got weirdly fixated on Duke for some reason. I think most of the people who were talking about Duke were more using it as an example against Berkeley/to bash Berkeley, not to support Duke in itself. Substitute it for Cornell or Dartmouth and I'd argue the same thing.

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Moneytrees » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:34 pm

PrezRand wrote:
Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits


Don't see why you would replace the UCs with UT since UCSD and UCSB are probably a bit ahead of it (UG and as research institutions), but other than that it's a good list. Had totally forgotten about Wake Forest.

UT has more recognized programs than UCSD and UCSB. It is definitely closer to UCLA/Michigan/Berkeley/UVA than people admit.


Nah I don't think so.

Hikikomorist

Platinum
Posts: 7788
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Hikikomorist » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:00 pm

Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits


Don't see why you would replace the UCs with UT since UCSD and UCSB are probably a bit ahead of it (UG and as research institutions), but other than that it's a good list. Had totally forgotten about Wake Forest.

UT has more recognized programs than UCSD and UCSB. It is definitely closer to UCLA/Michigan/Berkeley/UVA than people admit.


Nah I don't think so.

Yeah, that's laughably off. I suspect s/he's spent too much/the perfect amount of time in Texas.

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Moneytrees » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:19 pm

Hikikomorist wrote:
Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits


Don't see why you would replace the UCs with UT since UCSD and UCSB are probably a bit ahead of it (UG and as research institutions), but other than that it's a good list. Had totally forgotten about Wake Forest.

UT has more recognized programs than UCSD and UCSB. It is definitely closer to UCLA/Michigan/Berkeley/UVA than people admit.


Nah I don't think so.

Yeah, that's laughably off. I suspect s/he's spent too much/the perfect amount of time in Texas.


Texas cracks the T14 and now all its alumni are big swinging dicks.

gwillygecko

Bronze
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:04 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby gwillygecko » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:23 pm

Cornell can be in the T13 despite being ranked 14th at some point because it's one of thirteen schools to always be in the top 14. So T13 it is. lmao.

User avatar
jbagelboy

Diamond
Posts: 10249
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby jbagelboy » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:27 pm

candidlatke wrote:HYPSM
Chicago/Columbia/Penn/top LAC's
Duke/Dartmouth/Cornell/Brown/Georgetown/John Hopkins
Berkeley/UVA/UMich/WUSTL/Vanderbilt/Rice/CMU/Northwestern
UT/UCLA/UNC/the better known flagships/BC/average private schools/etc.
Lesser known state schools like the other UC's/William Mary/etc.

Also, the placement power of the non Berkeley/UCLA UC's is really shitty.
MBB doesn't recruit at any of the UC's besides Berkeley and a tiny amount at UCLA, and the top investment banks are similarly represented (though they take a tiny few. Have seen a few friends from UCSD go to JP Morgan in SF and a few from UCSB as well)
Google/Facebook/Amazon/etc. you have maybe like 10 kids a year going to there per lesser UC.
Apparently UCI reported something like a 15% full time employment rate recently. Friend linked me this: http://www.oir.uci.edu/files/surveys/Se ... esults.pdf
And mind you, UCI's ranked higher than SD at this point on that ranking people are putting so much emphasis on, right below UCSB which are next up from UCLA/Berkeley in case you were wondering.

Also people got weirdly fixated on Duke for some reason. I think most of the people who were talking about Duke were more using it as an example against Berkeley/to bash Berkeley, not to support Duke in itself. Substitute it for Cornell or Dartmouth and I'd argue the same thing.


As much as I hate this conversation, this poster's list best approximates how undergraduate institutions are actually regarded by people with some knowledge. Caltech probably goes with columbia, Chicago, Penn, Amherst, Pomona, Swarthmore, ect., although its reputation would be at the top in STEM. These so-called "tiers" obviously vary a little by subject but this is a decent take.

User avatar
BVest

Platinum
Posts: 7887
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby BVest » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:30 pm

There seems to be a lot of extraneous debate about the relative quality of various grad programs in answer to a question of "What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?" I'm not saying the UC proponents are wrong, I'm just saying let's stick to the call of the question, folks.
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
laqueredup

Bronze
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:05 am

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby laqueredup » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:57 pm

ponderingmeerkat wrote:
laqueredup wrote: I'd think West Point and Annapolis would belong in the top 3 tiers somewhere.


Blatant USAFA trolling. :lol:


Colorado Springs? What's that?

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1875
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby ponderingmeerkat » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:02 pm

laqueredup wrote:
ponderingmeerkat wrote:
laqueredup wrote: I'd think West Point and Annapolis would belong in the top 3 tiers somewhere.


Blatant USAFA trolling. :lol:


Colorado Springs? What's that?


The world's largest confluence of cholos, rednecks and suburban hell strangely stuck on the side of a mountain. Presftigious!

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Moneytrees » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:16 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
candidlatke wrote:HYPSM
Chicago/Columbia/Penn/top LAC's
Duke/Dartmouth/Cornell/Brown/Georgetown/John Hopkins
Berkeley/UVA/UMich/WUSTL/Vanderbilt/Rice/CMU/Northwestern
UT/UCLA/UNC/the better known flagships/BC/average private schools/etc.
Lesser known state schools like the other UC's/William Mary/etc.

Also, the placement power of the non Berkeley/UCLA UC's is really shitty.
MBB doesn't recruit at any of the UC's besides Berkeley and a tiny amount at UCLA, and the top investment banks are similarly represented (though they take a tiny few. Have seen a few friends from UCSD go to JP Morgan in SF and a few from UCSB as well)
Google/Facebook/Amazon/etc. you have maybe like 10 kids a year going to there per lesser UC.
Apparently UCI reported something like a 15% full time employment rate recently. Friend linked me this: http://www.oir.uci.edu/files/surveys/Se ... esults.pdf
And mind you, UCI's ranked higher than SD at this point on that ranking people are putting so much emphasis on, right below UCSB which are next up from UCLA/Berkeley in case you were wondering.

Also people got weirdly fixated on Duke for some reason. I think most of the people who were talking about Duke were more using it as an example against Berkeley/to bash Berkeley, not to support Duke in itself. Substitute it for Cornell or Dartmouth and I'd argue the same thing.


As much as I hate this conversation, this poster's list best approximates how undergraduate institutions are actually regarded by people with some knowledge. Caltech probably goes with columbia, Chicago, Penn, Amherst, Pomona, Swarthmore, ect., although its reputation would be at the top in STEM. These so-called "tiers" obviously vary a little by subject but this is a decent take.


Don't see why you would place schools like UVA and UMich ahead of UCLA (they are pretty obviously peers). Also, is UT really on the same level as Emory, ND, Tufts and Wake (and why would you call those schools average, yet name drop BC)? Are the UCs are not well known flagships? Seems like a pretty random list.

Personally I never thought the LACs were necessarily as prestigious as the Ivy league, but I suppose some people on the west coast would consider Pomona more prestigious than Dartmouth.

Hikikomorist

Platinum
Posts: 7788
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Hikikomorist » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:38 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
candidlatke wrote:HYPSM
Chicago/Columbia/Penn/top LAC's
Duke/Dartmouth/Cornell/Brown/Georgetown/John Hopkins
Berkeley/UVA/UMich/WUSTL/Vanderbilt/Rice/CMU/Northwestern
UT/UCLA/UNC/the better known flagships/BC/average private schools/etc.
Lesser known state schools like the other UC's/William Mary/etc.

Also, the placement power of the non Berkeley/UCLA UC's is really shitty.
MBB doesn't recruit at any of the UC's besides Berkeley and a tiny amount at UCLA, and the top investment banks are similarly represented (though they take a tiny few. Have seen a few friends from UCSD go to JP Morgan in SF and a few from UCSB as well)
Google/Facebook/Amazon/etc. you have maybe like 10 kids a year going to there per lesser UC.
Apparently UCI reported something like a 15% full time employment rate recently. Friend linked me this: http://www.oir.uci.edu/files/surveys/Se ... esults.pdf
And mind you, UCI's ranked higher than SD at this point on that ranking people are putting so much emphasis on, right below UCSB which are next up from UCLA/Berkeley in case you were wondering.

Also people got weirdly fixated on Duke for some reason. I think most of the people who were talking about Duke were more using it as an example against Berkeley/to bash Berkeley, not to support Duke in itself. Substitute it for Cornell or Dartmouth and I'd argue the same thing.


As much as I hate this conversation, this poster's list best approximates how undergraduate institutions are actually regarded by people with some knowledge. Caltech probably goes with columbia, Chicago, Penn, Amherst, Pomona, Swarthmore, ect., although its reputation would be at the top in STEM. These so-called "tiers" obviously vary a little by subject but this is a decent take.

Is this referring to recruiting for the major banks and consulting companies or something else?

User avatar
PrezRand

Gold
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby PrezRand » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:43 pm

Hikikomorist wrote:
Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Moneytrees wrote:
PrezRand wrote:
Hikikomorist wrote:
star fox wrote:Hikko - I was thinking about this and you're my go to guy on these sorts of things. What is the cutoff for what constitutes a prestigious undergrad?

National Universities
Tier 1: PSYC(Is this CalTech?)HM
Tier 2: Columbia, Chicago, Duke, Penn, Dartmouth, Vanderbilt, Brown, Rice, Georgetown, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 3: WUSTL, Johns Hopkins, NYU, Notre Dame, Emory, Berkeley, Tufts, Carnegie Mellon,
Tier 4: UVA, Michigan, Boston College, USC, UCLA, UT, UNC, Wake Forest Maybe William and Mary

Just a rough outline. Order within tiers not super precise. Personal preference would be slightly different in some cases. Open to disagreement/suggestions.

I had to return to this cancerous thread. I agree with this a lot but here would be my edits


Don't see why you would replace the UCs with UT since UCSD and UCSB are probably a bit ahead of it (UG and as research institutions), but other than that it's a good list. Had totally forgotten about Wake Forest.

UT has more recognized programs than UCSD and UCSB. It is definitely closer to UCLA/Michigan/Berkeley/UVA than people admit.


Nah I don't think so.

Yeah, that's laughably off. I suspect s/he's spent too much/the perfect amount of time in Texas.

Or you can check out the rankings for programs like business and engineering. It's more laughable to say that UCSD and SB are ahead of UT

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Moneytrees » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:56 pm

You can't just pick two categories and call it a day, plus UCSD ranks like 3rd in bioengineering since it's in San Diego and its engineering school is pretty well known since it gets a lot of investment from local giants like Qualcomm.

UT is a great school and is probably a bit underrated but there must be a reason why almost all of the UC's are ranked way higher both in the US news national rankings and the global rankings, right?

Hikikomorist

Platinum
Posts: 7788
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Hikikomorist » Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:59 pm

Neither UT nor UCX/Y/Z has significant prestige beyond the state border.

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 791
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: 2018 USNWR Rankings

Postby Moneytrees » Wed Mar 15, 2017 9:06 pm

Hikikomorist wrote:Neither UT nor UCX/Y/Z has significant prestige beyond the state border.


Agreed, but there is a pretty substantial gulf in terms of overall academic strength between some of the top UC's and UT.



Return to “Law School Admissions Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests