runinthefront wrote:Rigo wrote:Highly doubt WUSTL stacks sections. That's TTT behavior.
Rigo, just stop. No one has made that claim here. I don't even think WUSTL gives out conditional scholarships.
No need to get panties in a twist. It's all good.
runinthefront wrote:Rigo wrote:Highly doubt WUSTL stacks sections. That's TTT behavior.
Rigo, just stop. No one has made that claim here. I don't even think WUSTL gives out conditional scholarships.
Rigo wrote:runinthefront wrote:Rigo wrote:Highly doubt WUSTL stacks sections. That's TTT behavior.
Rigo, just stop. No one has made that claim here. I don't even think WUSTL gives out conditional scholarships.
No need to get panties in a twist. It's all good.
Fiddlesticks wrote:It says on their pamphlet that they have 15% STEM majors.. is that significantly higher than other schools? I feel like not, but I don't know.
vcap180 wrote:Fiddlesticks wrote:It says on their pamphlet that they have 15% STEM majors.. is that significantly higher than other schools? I feel like not, but I don't know.
Interesting. Probably not?
bmathers wrote:vcap180 wrote:Fiddlesticks wrote:It says on their pamphlet that they have 15% STEM majors.. is that significantly higher than other schools? I feel like not, but I don't know.
Interesting. Probably not?
Why advertise that if it isn´t significant? Simply because no one else does and it may get lesser informed people to apply?
RamTitan wrote:bmathers wrote:vcap180 wrote:Fiddlesticks wrote:It says on their pamphlet that they have 15% STEM majors.. is that significantly higher than other schools? I feel like not, but I don't know.
Interesting. Probably not?
Why advertise that if it isn´t significant? Simply because no one else does and it may get lesser informed people to apply?
It's definitely a possibility. Though that would deter me haha.
vcap180 wrote:Theoretically, you could maintain very strong medians by creating a class composed almost entirely of splitters and reverse splitters (I'm not suggesting that this is what WUSTL is doing)
HYPSM wrote:personofinterest wrote:vcap180 wrote:Theoretically, you could maintain very strong medians by creating a class composed almost entirely of splitters and reverse splitters (I'm not suggesting that this is what WUSTL is doing)
It looks like they are doing exactly that.
+1
Given their range, it appears that's precisely what they're doing.
proteinshake wrote:HYPSM wrote:personofinterest wrote:vcap180 wrote:Theoretically, you could maintain very strong medians by creating a class composed almost entirely of splitters and reverse splitters (I'm not suggesting that this is what WUSTL is doing)
It looks like they are doing exactly that.
+1
Given their range, it appears that's precisely what they're doing.
UVA and Penn do this too right?
life2323 wrote:UMN Law School
159/164/166
3.48/3.75/3.87
Class Size: 176
Soure: Posted on UMN law admission Instagram profile
life2323 wrote:UMN Law School
159 (+1) / 164 / 166
3.48 / 3.75 (-0.04) / 3.87 (-0.03)
Class Size: 176 (+2)
Soure: Posted on UMN law admission Instagram profile
JoshLyman13 wrote:Northwestern:
LSAT - 163/168/170(+1)
GPA - 3.45(-0.11)/3.82(+0.05)/3.90(+0.05)
Class - 217 (+4)
Source - Brochure from LSAC forum
JoshLyman13 wrote:Emory:
LSAT - 157(+1)/165/166
GPA - 3.40(-0.05)/3.78(+0.01)/3.87(-0.01)
Class - 261 (+27)
bmathers wrote:JoshLyman13 wrote:Emory:
LSAT - 157(+1)/165/166
GPA - 3.40(-0.05)/3.78(+0.01)/3.87(-0.01)
Class - 261 (+27)
Hmm, with that 25th percentile UGPA drop, maybe it is still worthwhile throwing a reach app their way. Last cycle I was WL'ed at Emory, but had a very raw, unpolished application and possibly a different LSAT score (will find out shortly). My GPA is low (3.3), but with pretty decent addendum for my first 1-2 years and that's not horrible far from their lower 25th percentile.
RareExports wrote:Rigo wrote:They just have to get outcomes to improve as well.
My class at WUSTL (2018) is on pace to have dramatically increased job outcomes from the most recent data.
WUSTL's model (attracting STEM/non-traditional/etc. people with high LSATs and artificially low GPAs by giving huge scholarships) is working well.
Return to “Law School Admissions Forum�
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests