Hearing back Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
Purplepen

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:53 pm

Hearing back

Post by Purplepen » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:47 pm

I apologize if this question is annoying, but: is there a rhyme or reason to people getting rejected before you even if you applied around when they did? Based on my own acceptances/wls I've understood lsat plays a role in how quickly you'll hear back for positive things, but what about negatives? Is there any reason someone would be held on so long rather than to just let them go quickly? I'm not selling myself short here, some schools I've applied to I'm really just not competitive at besides some really unique softs in my professional experience, and that's okay with me; this waiting, however, is kind of painful lol.

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Hearing back

Post by BigZuck » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:49 pm

It took Chicago 13 months to finally reject me

Purplepen

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:53 pm

Re: Hearing back

Post by Purplepen » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:51 pm

BigZuck wrote:It took Chicago 13 months to finally reject me
Were there updates to your status checker during that time period?

User avatar
capricasixx

Silver
Posts: 765
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 6:39 pm

Re: Hearing back

Post by capricasixx » Mon Feb 22, 2016 5:58 pm

BigZuck wrote:It took Chicago 13 months to finally reject me
Please tell me this is black humor and not real life

User avatar
fliptrip

Gold
Posts: 1879
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 9:10 pm

Re: Hearing back

Post by fliptrip » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:10 pm

I don't even know what to say about Chicago and Zuck's 13 month wait. Je-sus!

Anyway...OP, it's simple. School's have auto-reject parameters in order to save time. If you've made it through some blood-lettings, it could mean a few things:

1. Your app has been assigned to someone who works a little more slowly than other staff in the office.
2. You are not an auto-reject and good news could be coming.
3. You are not an auto-reject and bad news is coming.

Either way, just be happy for every day you are still in the game. When they are ready to do you, they'll do you, whether its admit, deny, or WL.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Purplepen

New
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:53 pm

Re: Hearing back

Post by Purplepen » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:12 pm

fliptrip wrote:I don't even know what to say about Chicago and Zuck's 13 month wait. Je-sus!

Anyway...OP, it's simple. School's have auto-reject parameters in order to save time. If you've made it through some blood-lettings, it could mean a few things:

1. Your app has been assigned to someone who works a little more slowly than other staff in the office.
2. You are not an auto-reject and good news could be coming.
3. You are not an auto-reject and bad news is coming.

Either way, just be happy for every day you are still in the game. When they are ready to do you, they'll do you, whether its admit, deny, or WL.
Thank you so much for your help!

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Hearing back

Post by BigZuck » Mon Feb 22, 2016 6:35 pm

I was waitlisted somewhere along the way but yeah, 13 months

No real reason to let people off the hook early. Just like applicants apply to backup schools they would never attend, schools leave applicants they would never actually accept hanging on for months.

Or they're just slow for a bunch of potential reasons.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”