Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice? Forum
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 2:39 pm
Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
I really hope this question does not come off as gunner-ish, it's just a nagging concern I've had.
Assuming scholarships and other financial considerations are the same, in a decision between two schools, should the law school's difficulty ever come into the equation at all?
Take, for example, UChicago, which has a reputation of being very academically rigorous (and attracting more people who are good at handing that rigor) as compared to say MVP. Would someone be better off (in career options) doing better in the class rank in MVP than doing relatively worse in the class rank at UChicago? As a completely arbitrary distinction, would someone in the top 25% at MVP have better/same/worse options in BL/Clerkships than someone at median at UChicago?
I know Law Schools grades are pretty unpredictable, but there is a scholastic difference between MVP and UChicago from what I've been told.
I don't intend for this to offend anyone, and I know that there's a lot of incredibly intelligent people at all of the mentioned schools, I'm just trying to get an abstract sense of this question.
Thanks.
Assuming scholarships and other financial considerations are the same, in a decision between two schools, should the law school's difficulty ever come into the equation at all?
Take, for example, UChicago, which has a reputation of being very academically rigorous (and attracting more people who are good at handing that rigor) as compared to say MVP. Would someone be better off (in career options) doing better in the class rank in MVP than doing relatively worse in the class rank at UChicago? As a completely arbitrary distinction, would someone in the top 25% at MVP have better/same/worse options in BL/Clerkships than someone at median at UChicago?
I know Law Schools grades are pretty unpredictable, but there is a scholastic difference between MVP and UChicago from what I've been told.
I don't intend for this to offend anyone, and I know that there's a lot of incredibly intelligent people at all of the mentioned schools, I'm just trying to get an abstract sense of this question.
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 11413
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
Essentially, you're asking "how deep into a particular law school's class will biglaw & federal judicial clerkships go". This does vary by school within the T-14.
-
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
Is this a troll post? I seriously doubt there's a substantial difference in how competitive and smart students are within the T14. If you "get" law school and finish at the top of your class at a school like Penn, you probably would be at the top of your class at any T14.
Any reference to "scholastic differences" and differences in "rigor" are probably just based on anecdotal or biased information, which you shouldn't trust.
Any reference to "scholastic differences" and differences in "rigor" are probably just based on anecdotal or biased information, which you shouldn't trust.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
If you're asking "Should I go to the University of Chicago?" I think the answer is an emphatic "Yes."
- usn26
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
It's still on a curve. So if it's more "rigorous" it's that way for everyone.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
I think you're asking: "Will I have to work harder to achieve median at UChi than I would at UVA?"
No one has attended both schools. I've attended neither. But it's possible that the answer is yes.
If you're instead asking: "Assuming I work hard enough to keep pace, am I more likely to hit median at UVA than I would be at UChi?"
The answer here is: probably not. Your peers at either school will be very good at law exams.
No one has attended both schools. I've attended neither. But it's possible that the answer is yes.
If you're instead asking: "Assuming I work hard enough to keep pace, am I more likely to hit median at UVA than I would be at UChi?"
The answer here is: probably not. Your peers at either school will be very good at law exams.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 2:39 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
I see your point, but I feel like that's not quite what I mean.kcdc1 wrote:I think you're asking: "Will I have to work harder to achieve median at UChi than I would at UVA?"
No one has attended both schools. I've attended neither. But it's possible that the answer is yes.
If you're instead asking: "Assuming I work hard enough to keep pace, am I more likely to hit median at UVA than I would be at UChi?"
The answer here is: probably not. Your peers at either school will be very good at law exams.
If we accept the premise that law school is more than just working hard, say if Mary's max potential at UChi is median rank, and her max potential at MVP is 75th percentile rank (just for argument's sake), where is she better off for BL and Clerking?
Essentially, and this is way too broad of a question, does the extra placement power/"prestige"/whatever of Chicago overcome or match students with a better class rank at schools like Michigan and Virginia?
To other people, do you guys really think that there's no real difference between students at T14 law schools? I would imagine that there has to be some degree of self-selection.
-
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:48 am
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
IMO, your Mary does not exist.Say if Mary's max potential at UChi is median rank, and her max potential at MVP is 75th percentile rank (just for argument's sake), where is she better off for BL and Clerking?
Assuming Mary works crazy hard at any school she attends and would be ~75th percentile at MVP, Mary would probably also be ~75th percentile at UChi.
I believe that differences in average law exam aptitude between schools in the T14 are negligible. Again tho, I'm only attending one school. And it's not any of the schools you're considering.
Between schools in the T14, I'd choose based on cost of attendance and geographic preference.
-
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:15 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
BigZuck wrote:If you're asking "Should I go to the University of Chicago?" I think the answer is an emphatic "Yes."
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
Whatever difference there might be would be so small as not to matter.Notareallawyer123 wrote: To other people, do you guys really think that there's no real difference between students at T14 law schools? I would imagine that there has to be some degree of self-selection.
- bearsfan23
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:19 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
As a Chicago 2L, I highly doubt there is any difference in student quality between here and any of the rest T14, or even somewhere beyond that.
The only thing that is really different here is our grading system, which results in the most highly stratified grade ranges of any T14 school (since its 160-186) rather than A, B, C, etc. So, for example, we have 3 different levels of a "B+", whereas almost everywhere else it would just be a 3.3 (or whatever it is).
That's the biggest thing I envy about Yale, so little pressure on grades, especially 1L. Chicago is pretty much the opposite, especially being on a Quarter system.
That doesn't have anything to do with whether the quality of the students is better/worse - it almost certainly is non-existent in terms of difference between Chi and MVP, so I wouldn't let that affect a deicision
The only thing that is really different here is our grading system, which results in the most highly stratified grade ranges of any T14 school (since its 160-186) rather than A, B, C, etc. So, for example, we have 3 different levels of a "B+", whereas almost everywhere else it would just be a 3.3 (or whatever it is).
That's the biggest thing I envy about Yale, so little pressure on grades, especially 1L. Chicago is pretty much the opposite, especially being on a Quarter system.
That doesn't have anything to do with whether the quality of the students is better/worse - it almost certainly is non-existent in terms of difference between Chi and MVP, so I wouldn't let that affect a deicision
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
I'm not even sure how you'd go about measuring the differences between "rigor" of class sizes between schools that select from the same group of people - all of whom were successful enough in UG and on the LSAT to get into T14 schools - and who have dozens of different variables they use to choose between law schools (cost, geography, job prospects, "feel," neighborhood, facilities).
Perceived reputation (CLS - cutthroat, Chicago - striverish nerds, NYU - laid back PI kids might enter into the equation for some people, but it's highly unlikely that this changes the makeup of the student body in any meaningful way.
Perceived reputation (CLS - cutthroat, Chicago - striverish nerds, NYU - laid back PI kids might enter into the equation for some people, but it's highly unlikely that this changes the makeup of the student body in any meaningful way.
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
Yea pretty much agreed as a fellow UofC 2L. Smiley face grades are also probably better reflective of the actual differences between most law school exams.bearsfan23 wrote:As a Chicago 2L, I highly doubt there is any difference in student quality between here and any of the rest T14, or even somewhere beyond that.
The only thing that is really different here is our grading system, which results in the most highly stratified grade ranges of any T14 school (since its 160-186) rather than A, B, C, etc. So, for example, we have 3 different levels of a "B+", whereas almost everywhere else it would just be a 3.3 (or whatever it is).
That's the biggest thing I envy about Yale, so little pressure on grades, especially 1L. Chicago is pretty much the opposite, especially being on a Quarter system.
That doesn't have anything to do with whether the quality of the students is better/worse - it almost certainly is non-existent in terms of difference between Chi and MVP, so I wouldn't let that affect a deicision
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- twenty
- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
Speaking from a complete lack of knowledge other than being at a school with graded LRW and on the semester system, ungraded LRW would have made 1L a LOT easier, but I can't imagine having three sets of finals. That'd suck a lot.
- xael
- Posts: 7548
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 5:18 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
Speaking from experience, nope.beepboopbeep wrote:Yea pretty much agreed as a fellow UofC 2L. Smiley face grades are also probably better reflective of the actual differences between most law school exams.bearsfan23 wrote:As a Chicago 2L, I highly doubt there is any difference in student quality between here and any of the rest T14, or even somewhere beyond that.
The only thing that is really different here is our grading system, which results in the most highly stratified grade ranges of any T14 school (since its 160-186) rather than A, B, C, etc. So, for example, we have 3 different levels of a "B+", whereas almost everywhere else it would just be a 3.3 (or whatever it is).
That's the biggest thing I envy about Yale, so little pressure on grades, especially 1L. Chicago is pretty much the opposite, especially being on a Quarter system.
That doesn't have anything to do with whether the quality of the students is better/worse - it almost certainly is non-existent in terms of difference between Chi and MVP, so I wouldn't let that affect a deicision
Probably a grass is always greener issue, though.
- beepboopbeep
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:36 pm
Re: Should a school's difficulty be a concern in choice?
It's not too bad. Two of the quarters you only have two exams.twenty wrote:Speaking from a complete lack of knowledge other than being at a school with graded LRW and on the semester system, ungraded LRW would have made 1L a LOT easier, but I can't imagine having three sets of finals. That'd suck a lot.
I didn't mind having graded LRW; it made me try at a thing that I think was a good thing to try at. What stinks is how idiosyncratic the LRW professors were (or at least mine) in terms of what they wanted. Mine encouraged passive voice and basically graded on how many citations you had, regardless of their quality - which I guess was good prep for journal work, but was a bummer to realize after the fact.
Speaking from grading experience? Unless we're misunderstanding each other, I don't see how else you'd know. But yea I'm sure I'm underestimating the downsides to having basically black-box grades except on the extreme high/low end. It just feels like our system is more granular than you could possibly get w/r/t telling a 177 exam from a 178 one (median, and very slightly higher than median). On the very low and high end it makes more sense.xael wrote: Speaking from experience, nope.
Probably a grass is always greener issue, though.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login