Latest employment data

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
cal2013
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:22 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby cal2013 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:41 pm

Mack.Hambleton wrote:>baylor

No


Why?

User avatar
Winston1984
Posts: 1789
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby Winston1984 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:47 pm

cal2013 wrote:
Mack.Hambleton wrote:>baylor

No


Why?

It's apparently hell on earth.

03152016
Posts: 9189
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby 03152016 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:48 pm

i like how you edited out the part about how TLS is some big anti-baylor circlejerk
as if we really cared about that toilet
i also like how you edited out the part about how edgy mack is

looks like we have ourselves some real edit ninjas in c/o 2018

User avatar
Capitol_Idea
Posts: 10669
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:54 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby Capitol_Idea » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:50 pm

Nothing gets by brut. Nothing.

User avatar
rpupkin
Posts: 3864
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby rpupkin » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:01 pm

zacharus85 wrote:Nothing gets by brut. Nothing.

He's like a human wayback machine of TLS posts.

BigZuck
Posts: 10851
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby BigZuck » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:46 pm

I've met real life Baylor students and heard their horror stories first hand.

Job numbers seem ok, hopefully it's cheap for people who attend.

User avatar
cal2013
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:22 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby cal2013 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:50 pm

Brut wrote:i like how you edited out the part about how TLS is some big anti-baylor circlejerk
as if we really cared about that toilet
i also like how you edited out the part about how edgy mack is

looks like we have ourselves some real edit ninjas in c/o 2018


I'm glad you liked those things.

To be fair, his post was rather edgy.

User avatar
cal2013
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2015 1:22 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby cal2013 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:54 pm

BigZuck wrote:I've met real life Baylor students and heard their horror stories first hand.

Job numbers seem ok, hopefully it's cheap for people who attend.


Agreed on both counts. I have spoken with several recent grads who echo the "beware, this place is not disneyland" warning, but all of them did recommend attending if it was at a steep discount.

I'm not a Baylor apologist, but it isn't a toilet for those with modest goals.

TheOnePercent
Posts: 100
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:22 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby TheOnePercent » Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:52 pm

cannibal ox wrote:
zombie mcavoy wrote:Y'all are ruining UT's moment of glory!


And Michigan/GULC's moment of shame.


LULZ Michigan thread attributing low BL/FC #'s "completely [to] self-selection." Checking that off my "Michigan Placement Excuses Bingo Card."

EEguy5 wrote:I'm not sure what the data shows, or why it shows a [Michigan] decline in BL/FC, but I would assume it is completely self selected.

User avatar
rpupkin
Posts: 3864
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby rpupkin » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:11 pm

TheOnePercent wrote:LULZ Michigan thread attributing low BL/FC #'s "completely [to] self-selection." Checking that off my "Michigan Placement Excuses Bingo Card."

I also liked the "all the 1Ls I know have summer jobs/externships" point, as if the same couldn't be said of just about any law school. That one wasn't even on my bingo card.

User avatar
yomisterd
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby yomisterd » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:35 pm

guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

JFO1833
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:06 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby JFO1833 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:45 pm

Wasn't able to fill this out before.

78: Brooklyn - BL+FC-12.8% (-1.2%), FTLTBR-52.4% (-4.1%), FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-52.4% (-4.1%)

Still missing:

Temple
CUNY
John Marshall Atlanta
Belmont

Have these schools missed a deadline?

User avatar
Saddle Up
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby Saddle Up » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:05 am

yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.

User avatar
AT9
Posts: 1298
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby AT9 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:13 am

Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.


CoA = Court of Appeals (clerkships)
COA = Cost of Attendance

At least that's what I gathered from his post.

User avatar
chuckbass
Posts: 9957
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby chuckbass » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:14 am

Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.

Just a wild guess, but I think CoA in this context was getting at court of appeals...

Dammit scooped.

User avatar
Saddle Up
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:01 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby Saddle Up » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:16 am

:oops:
AT9 wrote:
Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.


CoA = Court of Appeals (clerkships)
COA = Cost of Attendance

At least that's what I gathered from his post.

I think you're right about that. As a 1L the court of appeals is not exactly on my radar. Opps :oops:

User avatar
yomisterd
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby yomisterd » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:23 am

Saddle Up wrote::oops:
AT9 wrote:
Saddle Up wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

Not so sure if an analysis of CoA is even possible or that it would be meaningful. If the sticker is $40k and the data shows the average student is paying $25k, it still would be irrelevant. For someone with a 3.8/172 is the CoA could be minimal. A 3.3/162 might get you waitlisted for the opportunity of paying sticker.

What could work is a formula based rate card but, as is, negotiating college is the same as dealing with a car salesman.


CoA = Court of Appeals (clerkships)
COA = Cost of Attendance

At least that's what I gathered from his post.

I think you're right about that. As a 1L the court of appeals is not exactly on my radar. Opps :oops:


thx for the helpful post though on COA.

03152016
Posts: 9189
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby 03152016 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:24 am

yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%

03152016
Posts: 9189
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby 03152016 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:25 am

to be completely honest
i did not expect that from cornell
i'm totally surprised

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:25 am

Brut wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%


howd u do this

03152016
Posts: 9189
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby 03152016 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:26 am

although actually now that i think about it
cornell is probably super nyc heavy
so that probably explains part of it
still, impressive

i'm actually going to re-do this using grade selective firms (as opposed to just v10) when i have the chance
probably this weekend

03152016
Posts: 9189
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby 03152016 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:26 am

Mack.Hambleton wrote:
Brut wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%


howd u do this

nlj data + lst + vault rankings + a calculator

User avatar
yomisterd
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby yomisterd » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:27 am

Mack.Hambleton wrote:
Brut wrote:
yomisterd wrote:guys we must go deeper. we need an analysis of CoA + V10.

i did the east coast schools, c/o 2013 stats

cls - 22.43%
cornell - 16.58%
nyu - 16.57%
h - 16.26%
y - 14.78%
penn - 11.97%
duke - 11.62%
uva - 9.07%
gulc - 8.68%


howd u do this


i'm also skeptical/impressed

03152016
Posts: 9189
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Latest employment data

Postby 03152016 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:28 am

no need for skepticism
the data is all public
why would i make up something that can be easily verified

queerqueg
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2015 11:19 pm

Re: Latest employment data

Postby queerqueg » Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:29 am

The REAL new tiers (NFL law, the only important metric):

HGR (Whorevard, GW, Rutgers)
YWT (Yalé, Widener, Tulane)
SPBG (Stamford, Penn, Berkeley, GTown)

You heard it here first




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sanibella and 1 guest