What joke? My post was in response to Dafaq's list of top 10 SFJ schools, but it ended up above it because it looks like he deleted and reposted with correct GWU %.skers wrote:how about we all run this joke into the ground more.hoos89 wrote:GWU should be #2 assuming your percentages are right.
Latest employment data Forum
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Last edited by hoos89 on Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
Saint Louis Law (SLU):
http://law.slu.edu/sites/default/files/ ... f_2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF): 61%
FC + BL : 13.5%
http://law.slu.edu/sites/default/files/ ... f_2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF): 61%
FC + BL : 13.5%
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:39 pm
Re: Latest employment data
docdoc wrote:Well, fuck.arklaw13 wrote:Well that's dosappointing. Holy hell at those school-funded numbers.JFO1833 wrote:Vandy is in:
17: Vanderbilt - BL+FC-41%, FTLTBR-85%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-73%
https://law.vanderbilt.edu/2014-EmploymentSummary.pdf
I'd still like to know what the school funded jobs actually entail.
it's just more time to look for a real job I assume? But it's better than nothing until you found something legit. Although I'm sure that gaming the rankings is the primary reason for schools having them.
- Mozart Lacrimosa
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:01 pm
Re: Latest employment data
I'm bearish on Detroit-Mercy, just doesn't have the legs to get that Grand Rapids Big Law
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
Last edited by Username123 on Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:06 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Good work to those above on St. Louis and West Virigina.
87: St. Louis - BL+FC-13%, FTLTBR-61%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-61%
94: West Virginia - BL+FC-18%, FTLTBR-57%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-57%
142: William Mitchell - BL+FC-5%, FTLTBR-54%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-54%
Correction it appears to be half 2013/half 2014 data. They updated the number of graduates but not the full time employment.
87: St. Louis - BL+FC-13%, FTLTBR-61%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-61%
94: West Virginia - BL+FC-18%, FTLTBR-57%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-57%
142: William Mitchell - BL+FC-5%, FTLTBR-54%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-54%
This is actually last years data, I checked it against the 2013 report from the ABA website. I think they are having some trouble getting their site updated.Uschoolqb10 wrote:U San Diego - http://www.sandiego.edu/law/careers/stu ... a-2013.php
Correction it appears to be half 2013/half 2014 data. They updated the number of graduates but not the full time employment.
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 45.1%
FC + BL : 3.8%
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 45.1%
FC + BL : 3.8%
Last edited by Username123 on Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: Latest employment data
I vote against the T18 suggestion, which could have only have been put forth by a WUSTL apologist.
- Winston1984
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Re: Latest employment data
gadamn... Are there no legal jobs in Oregon?Uschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Not that I'm not biased or anything, but average COA probably should be a factor in the rankings. WUSTL was probably the cheapest T1 option for most of its students. WUSTL doesn't have T18 placement, but probably does have T18 value.Moneytrees wrote:I vote against the T18 suggestion, which could have only have been put forth by a WUSTL apologist.
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: Latest employment data
How does a state flagship fuck up that badUschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Of course, that should count for something I suppose. But until it decreases its size substantially, it's going to be behind USC, ND, and probably BU and BC, in terms of outcomes.hoos89 wrote:Not that I'm not biased or anything, but average COA probably should be a factor in the rankings. WUSTL was probably the cheapest T1 option for most of its students.Moneytrees wrote:I vote against the T18 suggestion, which could have only have been put forth by a WUSTL apologist.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:19 pm
Re: Latest employment data
http://www.baylor.edu/content/services/ ... 242557.pdf
Baylor is out. Quite disappointing, but not much deviation from previous years. This must be a product of being in Waco. Baylor gets the scraps leftover from UT, SMU, and Houston.
Baylor is out. Quite disappointing, but not much deviation from previous years. This must be a product of being in Waco. Baylor gets the scraps leftover from UT, SMU, and Houston.
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
It's a shame.Mack.Hambleton wrote:How does a state flagship fuck up that badUschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
- AT9
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm
Re: Latest employment data
The 33.7% figure is inaccurate I think. Isn't it 83/184, so 45%? Still bad, but not 33.7% bad.Winston1984 wrote:gadamn... Are there no legal jobs in Oregon?Uschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:39 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Another thing to keep in mind is that the class of 2014, while not as big as 2013 which was the biggest ever, is still one of the biggest ever. It's top 5 or so...
Last edited by MikeJD on Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- MT Cicero
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Yeah, this. 88 (total) - 1 (LSF) - 4 (solo) = 83. 83/184 = 45.1%AT9 wrote:The 33 figure is inaccurate I think. Isn't it 83/184, so 45%?Winston1984 wrote:gadamn... Are there no legal jobs in Oregon?Uschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
*Edited for accuracy
Last edited by MT Cicero on Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
I thought it was 88 (FTLTBR) - 4 (Solos) - 22 (total Law School Funded positions) = 62/184 (total grads)AT9 wrote:The 33.7% figure is inaccurate I think. Isn't it 83/184, so 45%? Still bad, but not 33.7% bad.Winston1984 wrote:gadamn... Are there no legal jobs in Oregon?Uschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
I might be wrong.
- Manteca
- Posts: 1287
- Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:55 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Aren't L&C/Willamette sub 50% schools as well? Ugly.
- MT Cicero
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Latest employment data
Law school funded is in the middle-ish section. You're looking at JD-Advantage jobs, which aren't funded by the law school. Those numbers aren't reflected in the FTLTBR.Uschoolqb10 wrote:I thought it was 88 (FTLTBR) - 4 (Solos) - 22 (total Law School Funded positions) = 62/184 (total grads)AT9 wrote:The 33.7% figure is inaccurate I think. Isn't it 83/184, so 45%? Still bad, but not 33.7% bad.Winston1984 wrote:gadamn... Are there no legal jobs in Oregon?Uschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
I might be wrong.
I see also that I screwed up because 3 of the LSF jobs are JD-A. I'll update my previous post.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 2:06 pm
Re: Latest employment data
67: Oklahoma - BL+FC-10%, FTLTBR-66%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-66%
82: Oregon - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-45%
82: Oregon - BL+FC-4%, FTLTBR-46%, FTLTBR (w/o LSF)-45%
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: Latest employment data
Only 1 school funded job is FTLTBRUschoolqb10 wrote:I thought it was 88 (FTLTBR) - 4 (Solos) - 22 (total Law School Funded positions) = 62/184 (total grads)AT9 wrote:The 33.7% figure is inaccurate I think. Isn't it 83/184, so 45%? Still bad, but not 33.7% bad.Winston1984 wrote:gadamn... Are there no legal jobs in Oregon?Uschoolqb10 wrote:Oregon : http://law.uoregon.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2014.pdf
FTLTBR (no LSF/solos) : 33.7%
FC + BL : 3.8%
I might be wrong.
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: Latest employment data
It was pretty much even with USC, BC, and ND last year in terms of BL+FC, and was ahead of BU. It's also way more generous with aid than any of those schools, and frankly debt at graduation should be a major factor in grading outcomes. It's also ahead of all of those schools this year in FTLTBR-SJF (pending BU and BC 2014 reports). WUSTL also has been reducing 1L class sizes regularly since C/O 2013 (notwithstanding a reportedly unanticipated increase for c/o 2017), but has also been taking in a lot of transfers.Moneytrees wrote:Of course, that should count for something I suppose. But until it decreases its size substantially, it's going to be behind USC, ND, and probably BU and BC, in terms of outcomes.hoos89 wrote:Not that I'm not biased or anything, but average COA probably should be a factor in the rankings. WUSTL was probably the cheapest T1 option for most of its students.Moneytrees wrote:I vote against the T18 suggestion, which could have only have been put forth by a WUSTL apologist.
Last edited by hoos89 on Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
Re: Latest employment data
I am looking in the middle section. You took the FTLT Law school funded position and I took ALL of the students employed by the university, which might be wrong (22 - middle section, bottom right box)MT Cicero wrote:
Law school funded is in the middle-ish section. You're looking at JD-Advantage jobs, which aren't funded by the law school. Those numbers aren't reflected in the FTLTBR.
I see also that I screwed up because 3 of the LSF jobs are JD-A. I'll update my previous post.
ETA: I was looking at the wrong section of LSF. I assumed it was everyone employed by the law school, not just LTFTBR employed.
OOPS! My numbers above might be off then lol sorry! Still, Oregon's numbers are woof.
Last edited by Username123 on Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login