.. Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Indifference

Silver
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:01 am

..

Post by Indifference » Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:40 am

..
Last edited by Indifference on Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lawschool1741

Bronze
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:32 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by lawschool1741 » Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:47 am

No addendum necessary.

They have metrics they need to hit and if they can report an incoming student w/ 177, that's plenty enough for them.

mvp99

Silver
Posts: 1474
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 9:00 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by mvp99 » Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:04 pm

enjoy Yale

User avatar
pylon

Silver
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by pylon » Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:17 pm

mujiali wrote: How badly will the other two scores hurt me? Should I just submit a simple addendum that says I wasn't prepared before my first two takes? What's the best way to go about this?
Not at all. I also wouldn't submit an addendum, unless you had an actual reason (not just lack of preparation). Congrats on the jump!

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Rigo » Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:31 pm

mvp99 wrote:enjoy Yale
This is thrown around way too frequently for posters who don't discuss softs at all.

OP, no addendum necessary.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Indifference

Silver
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:01 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Indifference » Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:52 pm

..
Last edited by Indifference on Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Rigo » Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:04 pm

mujiali wrote:
Dirigo wrote:
mvp99 wrote:enjoy Yale
This is thrown around way too frequently for posters who don't discuss softs at all.
OP, no addendum necessary.
As a longtime lurker I completely agree. My sorts make take questionable (k jd), but I am going to blanket the top t14 anyways.
I definitely wasn't trying to dissuade you from applying. In fact, you should definitely apply.
Yale is just such a black box that it's really a pipe dream for everyone. It rejects 180/4.0's every year.

User avatar
DetroitRed

Bronze
Posts: 230
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:40 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by DetroitRed » Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:50 pm

If you have a reason (apart from studying more) for the discrepancy, I would write an addendum. Some schools (including Yale) have said explicitly that they want addenda for score discrepancies of 6 points or more.

User avatar
KD35

Silver
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 11:30 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by KD35 » Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:53 pm

Congrats. Whatever school you end up at will love you, no need for an addendum.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Rigo » Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:22 pm

DetroitRed wrote:If you have a reason (apart from studying more) for the discrepancy, I would write an addendum. Some schools (including Yale) have said explicitly that they want addenda for score discrepancies of 6 points or more.
Any excuse for TWO lower LSATs would be super flimsy anyways.
LSAT addenda are super unnecessary after the ABA changed the reporting rules to only reporting the higher score.

Indifference

Silver
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:01 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Indifference » Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:29 pm

..
Last edited by Indifference on Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Rigo » Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:32 pm

Don't write an addendum. If schools care (which they won't), they may ask about it in your interview.

Hutz_and_Goodman

Gold
Posts: 1650
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Hutz_and_Goodman » Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:54 pm

TLS community: link to this thread every time someone in the 160s says they aren't retaking because they can't get higher.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by BillsFan9907 » Sun Jan 04, 2015 1:31 am

Dirigo wrote:
DetroitRed wrote:If you have a reason (apart from studying more) for the discrepancy, I would write an addendum. Some schools (including Yale) have said explicitly that they want addenda for score discrepancies of 6 points or more.
Any excuse for TWO lower LSATs would be super flimsy anyways.
LSAT addenda are super unnecessary after the ABA changed the reporting rules to only reporting the higher score.
You're applying to Yale and you had an undiagnosed thyroid condition causing extreme fatigue and mental fogginess after engaging in focused activites for a prolonged period of time. You had poor insurance. Following getting the proper insurance from Obamacare, you got a score better reflecting your abilities.

I suspect Yale would want to hear that.

sparty99

Gold
Posts: 1899
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by sparty99 » Sun Jan 04, 2015 1:44 am

mujiali wrote:I took the LSAT there times this cycle. I scored a dismal 163, followed by a crushing 164 retake. I got the shock of my life when the December score came back as a 177.

How badly will the other two scores hurt me? Should I just submit a simple addendum that says I wasn't prepared before my first two takes? What's the best way to go about this?

FWIW I have a 3.87 lsdas GPA.
Good luck at Yale, dude.

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Rigo » Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:22 am

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Sun Jan 04, 2015 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton

Platinum
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Mack.Hambleton » Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:30 am

good luck at Princeton, bro

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
twenty

Gold
Posts: 3189
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by twenty » Sun Jan 04, 2015 4:27 am

Dirigo wrote:
sparty99 wrote: Good luck at Yale, dude.
Dude, no.
no offense, but I sort of don't see why you're so worked up about this. just mentally translate it to "great work on your LSAT, enjoy your life." it's pretty unlikely that people (maybe excluding sparty?) are being willfully dense, or that applicants are so emotionally fragile that if they don't get yale after some putz on TLS told them to "enjoy it" that they'll slit their wrists or something.

Moneytrees

Silver
Posts: 932
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:41 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Moneytrees » Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:20 pm

He's probably a lock at any school except Yale. Still has a solid chance of getting in though.

User avatar
pylon

Silver
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by pylon » Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:49 pm

Image

musedreverie

Bronze
Posts: 256
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2014 7:01 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by musedreverie » Mon Jan 05, 2015 3:58 am

No addendum necessary, unless you had an excellent reason.

I jumped 9 points between retakes, didn't write addenda to any schools, and topic of my LSAT scores, retakes, the jumps etc. didn't come up in any of my interviews.

And great job on your December resit, what a fantastic present it must have been on the new year's!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Indifference

Silver
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:01 am

..

Post by Indifference » Mon Jan 05, 2015 9:50 am

..
Last edited by Indifference on Thu Jul 23, 2015 12:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.

kfb2112

New
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 2:01 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by kfb2112 » Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:48 pm

Just an FYI: I was a 167, 180 so I looked into this quite a bit. Nearly every good school explicitly says that if your score increases a substantial amount they want an addendum. Perhaps as some suggest they don't really care and just want to maximize scores, but even so, ignoring explicit instructions would be a mistake. I highly suggest you write one.

Indifference

Silver
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:01 am

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by Indifference » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:01 am

kfb2112 wrote:Just an FYI: I was a 167, 180 so I looked into this quite a bit. Nearly every good school explicitly says that if your score increases a substantial amount they want an addendum. Perhaps as some suggest they don't really care and just want to maximize scores, but even so, ignoring explicit instructions would be a mistake. I highly suggest you write one.
I've been looking around but haven't come across explicit instructions anywhere yet. Could you link to any you know of?

User avatar
superpatton

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:41 pm

Re: 163, 164, 177! addendum?

Post by superpatton » Tue Jan 06, 2015 1:14 am

I have yet to find one sentence on a t-14 school's application instructions that requires an addendum. Chicago suggests explaining a large discrepancy in scores on one of their FAQ pages on the website, but nothing on application instructions. I think if schools were that concerned about addendums for score increases they would explicitly say so on their LSAC applications. As it stands though just remember that the rankings only require schools to submit the higher score.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”