C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
Attax

Gold
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Attax » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:23 am

Brut wrote:dean, does it concern you that a full quarter of your class scored a 151 or below on the lsat?
isn't the real reason for admitting these students the financial incentive to fill seats, and not a genuine belief that these students will see a positive return on their law school investment?
when you look at the 17% of 2012 bar takers from ttu who failed to pass (i'm sure you've seen prof campos' article in the atlantic discussing lsat scores correlating with bar bass rates) do you regret admitting them?
I am not the dean, but in defense something to consider is that I doubt law schools are ignorant to this. They can't finance it for everyone, and can't deny everyone who they think won't have a positive outcome. If they did that, they wouldn't have the tuition coming in to even stay alive. It sucks, but its the way of the game. Do I think its right? No. But do I think that we should explicitly hold schools accountable for this behavior? Not necessarily. If they do it in a predatory way, such as Infinilaw places, then definitely so. But a school like TTU has its place. I don't think that many students go to TTU planning on doing biglaw. Many of the TTU grads I know stay out in West TX which isn't really a biglaw place. It is a relatively cheap school, and serves it purpose, but it simply must be recognized that to continue operations the school simply must admit some people with lesser stats. The information is out there, and if those individuals don't do their research should we blame the schools or them for falling for the law school trap?

User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:31 am

Before this goes any further let's nip the flame that Infilaw is any more predatory than many non-profits right in the bud.

As to the Dean's statement, his own school enrolled 6.5% more people this year, solidly outside of his stated 5% buffer that is supposedly indicative of random fluctuation. This by his own admission suggests that Tech intended to grow the class. More importantly, law schools should be decreasing class size. Keeping the class the same size is not acceptable when you provide such horrifyingly poor employment outcomes, and if decreasing in size were the goal an increase in class size should not be a real risk.

Now back to our regularly scheduled medians...

03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by 03152016 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:35 am

at least up until very recently, students have been conditioned to view law as a lofty and prestigious profession
students see lawyers portrayed this way in the media, their advisors in high school and college encourage them to pursue a legal education, as well as their parents, they may know lawyers who graduated in a better job market doing quite well for themselves
i do not buy this 'blame the student' mentality
when almost everything in one's life affirms a certain perception, i'm not surprised that people are unswayed by anonymous forum posters and scamblogs (aside: that's why lst is so important, and why we did the wiki thing)
and many people lack the cultural capital to even know to look

i'm not saying texas tech should close down
and i commend them for keeping tuition "low"
but as long as they keep class sizes so large, as long as they keep admitting people they know they can't place
as long as 45% of the class can't get ft/lt/jd and 22% of the class is underemployed
it is fair game to criticize them

03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by 03152016 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:41 am

i have a follow up question
professor loewy is paid $301k+, per year, by your law school
professor forney is paid $276k+ per year
is there really no place you can cut costs to reduce the number of students?
if that is the case, what unique or compelling feature does ttu have that other law schools admitting classes of 100 or 150 don't?

User avatar
Attax

Gold
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Attax » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:45 am

In regards to medians: I wouldn't expect anything from Texas anytime soon.

In regards to TTU: Good points, and especially on being outside their own buffer. But, regardless of the specific school, not all can manage to shrink classes and still provide the education because they can't afford it. IDK if that's the situation at TTU or not, but they have to get the money from somewhere. Yes the media and people may glorify things, but that doesn't mean that the burden of actual research isn't on the individual. Doctors are glorified by people, but I highly doubt being a doctor is like it is in Grey's Anatomy, what the work is like, what the lifestyle is like, job prospects, etc.

Now, I don't think all the blame lies on an individual, there definitely is blame on the schools as well. Obviously shrinking class sizes is important in this economy, being more transparent is (and damn on that Wikipedia project I hated Texas A&M's because their ABA disclosures were so difficult to find!), etc. But fully blaming the school for keeping class sizes at a size that will still allow for them to give good scholarships to top applicants, but still manage to fund the school isn't the only source of blame. Both are to blame appropriately for their own appropriate actions.

I'm ending my part of the discussion here because it is a bit off topic.

Medianmedianmedian. GO

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by 03152016 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:55 am

if, arguendo, i accept the student and law school are both to blame
i think it's clear that more blame falls on the savvy deans
i can accept that if a corrupt sleazy used car salesman sells a clueless customer a lemon, the customer shares some of the blame for not doing her own dd
but that does not mean their blameworthiness is proportional
similarly, many could have bought cars from the salesman and been quite pleased
perhaps the salesman should reduce the number of cars on the lot, selling only those that would result in a fair outcome for the purchaser
if the salesman responds he can't and remain financially solvent, he should either find ways to reduce costs or close the doors
i'm not saying he should be forced to, i'm not saying that it's an entirely practical solution in all cases
but if the seller cannot remain solvent without selling lemons, that is a problem he has a moral responsibility to address

User avatar
whitespider

Silver
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:37 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by whitespider » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:08 pm

While I agree it's concerning that Tech is growing in size considering diminishing applications and horrible general legal employment situation, I do have to commend Dean Perez for putting himself out there and thoughtfully answering questions. pond scummings, he is not.

As a gay dude with no interest in practicing in Texas, I certainly won't be applying. I see how it could be the right call for some Texas natives, though.

should-i-do-it

Bronze
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:45 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by should-i-do-it » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:11 pm

I think the bigger problem is the fact that we still have new law schools popping up. UNT is opening/or already has opened up one in Dallas. This is completely unnecessary, Texas already has more than enough law schools. Also the ABA doesn't seem to care at all about the thousands of grads that aren't and probably won't ever find jobs as lawyers. I don't know why they aren't forcing schools to limit class sizes.

rebexness

Gold
Posts: 4155
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by rebexness » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:13 pm

Ugh Less Talking, More Medians.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


should-i-do-it

Bronze
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:45 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by should-i-do-it » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:14 pm

rebexness wrote:Ugh Less Talking, More Medians.
+1

Hand

Gold
Posts: 3843
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Hand » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:15 pm

Last edited by Hand on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Attax

Gold
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Attax » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:20 pm

should-i-do-it wrote:
rebexness wrote:Ugh Less Talking, More Medians.
+1
This is not a median.

should-i-do-it

Bronze
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:45 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by should-i-do-it » Wed Aug 27, 2014 12:21 pm

What happen to Spivey?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


SPerez

Bronze
Posts: 416
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:22 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by SPerez » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:11 pm

Brut wrote:dean, does it concern you that a full quarter of your class scored a 151 or below on the lsat?
isn't the real reason for admitting these students the financial incentive to fill seats, and not a genuine belief that these students will see a positive return on their law school investment?
when you look at the 17% of 2012 bar takers from ttu who failed to pass (i'm sure you've seen prof campos' article in the atlantic discussing lsat scores correlating with bar bass rates) do you regret admitting them?
I will respond to various folks' comments over in my thread to avoid hijacking this one (even more).

Dean Perez

User avatar
ms9

Gold
Posts: 2999
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by ms9 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:47 pm

should-i-do-it wrote:What happen to Spivey?
I had that fundraising race up in mountains for LST and I stayed up here a few days :-)

I back tomorrow and will ask for Moar medians!!

Adrian Monk

Bronze
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Adrian Monk » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:49 pm

MikeSpivey wrote:
should-i-do-it wrote:What happen to Spivey?
I had that fundraising race up in mountains for LST and I stayed up here a few days :-)

I back tomorrow and will ask for Moar medians!!
thanks for your help!, and if possible would love info on hastings/ santa clara! thank you!

MikeJD

Bronze
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:39 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by MikeJD » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:58 pm

Adrian Monk wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:
should-i-do-it wrote:What happen to Spivey?
I had that fundraising race up in mountains for LST and I stayed up here a few days :-)

I back tomorrow and will ask for Moar medians!!
thanks for your help!, and if possible would love info on hastings/ santa clara! thank you!
Consider that UC hastings was down 20% in apps and Santa clara about 13% I would say at least -2 on the LSAT median to maintain class size.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Adrian Monk

Bronze
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 7:32 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Adrian Monk » Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:03 pm

MikeJD wrote:
Adrian Monk wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:
should-i-do-it wrote:What happen to Spivey?
I had that fundraising race up in mountains for LST and I stayed up here a few days :-)

I back tomorrow and will ask for Moar medians!!
thanks for your help!, and if possible would love info on hastings/ santa clara! thank you!
Consider that UC hastings was down 20% in apps and Santa clara about 13% I would say at least -2 on the LSAT median to maintain class size.
that would be bad for them, but awesome for me!, Im targeting hastings/santa clara. I believe im above the gpa median for hastings, and very well above the gpa median for santa clara. So, for me it all comes down to the lsat, im taking the sep one and all i hope for is to be as close as possible to their lsat medians.

Creditisgood

New
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:13 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by Creditisgood » Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:08 pm

I had that fundraising race up in mountains for LST and I stayed up here a few days :-)

I back tomorrow and will ask for Moar medians!!
Thank you Mr. Spivey.
Sending my contribution to LST today.

User avatar
JCougar

Gold
Posts: 3216
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by JCougar » Wed Aug 27, 2014 4:24 pm

Yeah, basically everyone should send in a few dollars to LST. The information they have fought to uncover is worth potentially tens of thousands of dollars to your average law school applicant today. So throwing them the cost of one LSAC application fee, at the very least, would do them justice. The people in charge there basically work for nothing except for the good they do for you guys.

https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/1p3lb/ab/e3Z2ff

User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1005
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by jenesaislaw » Wed Aug 27, 2014 4:40 pm

JCougar wrote:Yeah, basically everyone should send in a few dollars to LST. The information they have fought to uncover is worth potentially tens of thousands of dollars to your average law school applicant today. So throwing them the cost of one LSAC application fee, at the very least, would do them justice. The people in charge there basically work for nothing except for the good they do for you guys.

https://fundrazr.com/campaigns/1p3lb/ab/e3Z2ff
+1

Thank you for the very kind words.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by ilikebaseball » Wed Aug 27, 2014 5:16 pm

I dont care what anyone says, MUCH respect to Dean Perez for actually coming onto the boards and handling the biz himself. Even though the results are likely not as good as he had hoped, he still came up on here, facing all of the harsh and critical people on these boards, and said, "here are our #'s."

User avatar
TheodoreKGB

Bronze
Posts: 500
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 3:46 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by TheodoreKGB » Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:01 pm

.
Last edited by TheodoreKGB on Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

rebexness

Gold
Posts: 4155
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by rebexness » Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:02 pm

TheodoreKGB wrote:
ilikebaseball wrote:I dont care what anyone says, MUCH respect to Dean Perez for actually coming onto the boards and handling the biz himself. Even though the results are likely not as good as he had hoped, he still came up on here, facing all of the harsh and critical people on these boards, and said, "here are our #'s."
Couldn't agree more.

should-i-do-it

Bronze
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:45 pm

Re: C/O 2017 Median LSAT/GPA/Class Size (New Stats!!!)

Post by should-i-do-it » Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:10 pm

This thread needs moar medians

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”