C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
bizzybone1313
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby bizzybone1313 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:41 pm

MarkinKansasCity wrote:You guys can relax, this is the real one:

Image

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:


That looks like that was a very time consuming endeavor.

User avatar
LSATSCORES2012
Posts: 770
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby LSATSCORES2012 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:58 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Wait a minute. I just saw Reg posted this.

Fucking trolled hard. Excellently done, Reg. Everybody go home, UChi held the 171.

"Saw it linked elsewhere", that was good.


Do we know they are still at 171?

Naw, realistically I'm sure UChi still doesn't even know because they don't know who's going to be a noshow at orientation (which doesn't start until Monday)

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 9653
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby jbagelboy » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:09 pm

LSATSCORES2012 wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
Monochromatic Oeuvre wrote:Wait a minute. I just saw Reg posted this.

Fucking trolled hard. Excellently done, Reg. Everybody go home, UChi held the 171.

"Saw it linked elsewhere", that was good.


Do we know they are still at 171?

Naw, realistically I'm sure UChi still doesn't even know because they don't know who's going to be a noshow at orientation (which doesn't start until Monday)


Incredible we've been in school 5 weeks and you fools are just starting

I guess our summers start a bit sooner :)

User avatar
Nova
Posts: 9116
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Nova » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:19 pm

Quality trolling, Reg

notalobbyist
Posts: 124
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:25 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby notalobbyist » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:26 pm

bizzybone1313 wrote:OP needs to update the original post with Columbia's newly released medians as well as any other schools that have released stuff. Why is that some of the most important threads on this website are created by newbies? Moderators should monitor this and not allow it.


Op doesn't owe you anything.

User avatar
hephaestus
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby hephaestus » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:29 pm

notalobbyist wrote:
bizzybone1313 wrote:OP needs to update the original post with Columbia's newly released medians as well as any other schools that have released stuff. Why is that some of the most important threads on this website are created by newbies? Moderators should monitor this and not allow it.


Op doesn't owe you anything.

Yeah I dont quite get your absurd sense of entitlement.

User avatar
Nova
Posts: 9116
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Nova » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:34 pm

OP is doing a pretty good job

User avatar
bizzybone1313
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby bizzybone1313 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:34 pm

ImNoScar wrote:
notalobbyist wrote:
bizzybone1313 wrote:OP needs to update the original post with Columbia's newly released medians as well as any other schools that have released stuff. Why is that some of the most important threads on this website are created by newbies? Moderators should monitor this and not allow it.


Op doesn't owe you anything.

Yeah I dont quite get your absurd sense of entitlement.


I was simply making an observation. My point is true. The next time I write something similar I will be sure to soften my language in order to not offend you guys.

User avatar
twenty
Posts: 3153
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby twenty » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:35 pm

ImNoScar wrote:
notalobbyist wrote:
bizzybone1313 wrote:OP needs to update the original post with Columbia's newly released medians as well as any other schools that have released stuff. Why is that some of the most important threads on this website are created by newbies? Moderators should monitor this and not allow it.


Op doesn't owe you anything.

Yeah I dont quite get your absurd sense of entitlement.


In fairness, he's been doing that since he got here.

So at least it's consistent.

User avatar
bizzybone1313
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby bizzybone1313 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:39 pm

twentypercentmore wrote:
ImNoScar wrote:
notalobbyist wrote:
bizzybone1313 wrote:OP needs to update the original post with Columbia's newly released medians as well as any other schools that have released stuff. Why is that some of the most important threads on this website are created by newbies? Moderators should monitor this and not allow it.


Op doesn't owe you anything.

Yeah I dont quite get your absurd sense of entitlement.


In fairness, he's been doing that since he got here.

So at least it's consistent.


I try to be.

A newbie guy or gal created the initial thread for last year's URM cycle and never really came back to it for whatever reason. In that thread, I suggested that he or she create a poll so URM's could select their GPA and LSAT score, so everyone would know what they were up against. A lot of people aren't comfortable posting their stats. What ended up happening? Absolutely nothing.

If a person is going to create such an important thread and not post in it, it would serve everyone much better to not create it in the first place. I don't think it is fair to construe that as "entitlement."

04102014
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby 04102014 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:43 pm

I always thought listing the data in the op was a waste of time since there is a spreadsheet with all of the same info right there.

User avatar
jingosaur
Posts: 2225
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby jingosaur » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:01 pm

bizzybone1313 wrote:OP needs to update the original post with Columbia's newly released medians as well as any other schools that have released stuff. Why is that some of the most important threads on this website are created by newbies? Moderators should monitor this and not allow it.


OP has been pretty solid so far in keeping the thread up-to-date. Maybe he's just busy today or something.

20141023
Posts: 3072
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby 20141023 » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:23 pm

.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sat Feb 14, 2015 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rebexness
Posts: 4163
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby rebexness » Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:52 pm

bizzybone1313 wrote:
twentypercentmore wrote:
ImNoScar wrote:
notalobbyist wrote:
Op doesn't owe you anything.

Yeah I dont quite get your absurd sense of entitlement.


In fairness, he's been doing that since he got here.

So at least it's consistent.


I try to be.



A newbie guy or gal created the initial thread for last year's URM cycle and never really came back to it for whatever reason. In that thread, I suggested that he or she create a poll so URM's could select their GPA and LSAT score, so everyone would know what they were up against. A lot of people aren't comfortable posting their stats. What ended up happening? Absolutely nothing.

If a person is going to create such an important thread and not post in it, it would serve everyone much better to not create it in the first place. I don't think it is fair to construe that as "entitlement."


Alternately, you could stop being a noob and ask the mods to make you/someone else the OP.

User avatar
hephaestus
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby hephaestus » Thu Sep 19, 2013 11:12 pm

jingosaur wrote:
bizzybone1313 wrote:OP needs to update the original post with Columbia's newly released medians as well as any other schools that have released stuff. Why is that some of the most important threads on this website are created by newbies? Moderators should monitor this and not allow it.


OP has been pretty solid so far in keeping the thread up-to-date. Maybe he's just busy today or something.

God forbid he have a life beyond TLS.

User avatar
Happy Gilmore
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Happy Gilmore » Fri Sep 20, 2013 12:33 am

change my user name to Creighton school of law because I just got trolled by kappycaft1 :(

User avatar
altoid99
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:04 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby altoid99 » Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:02 am

Thanks to all those who've come to my defense! Yes, the school year started and I've been busier than I anticipated. I figured the spreadsheet is far more useful now that we have much more schools that have released their medians. I have contributed to the spreadsheet and continue to do so. Only criticize me if you found half the medians I have and reported them on here before I did. Just saying :)

User avatar
Dr. Dre
Posts: 2347
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Dr. Dre » Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:07 am

lol at the people complaining

User avatar
altoid99
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:04 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby altoid99 » Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:16 am

Also:

132) CUNY: 154 (-1); 3.37 (+.05); 104 (-16)

User avatar
Happy Gilmore
Posts: 314
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Happy Gilmore » Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:20 am

altoid99 wrote:Thanks to all those who've come to my defense! Yes, the school year started and I've been busier than I anticipated. I figured the spreadsheet is far more useful now that we have much more schools that have released their medians. I have contributed to the spreadsheet and continue to do so. Only criticize me if you found half the medians I have and reported them on here before I did. Just saying :)


Na, to be fair the critics have a point. Your lapse of not getting CLS onto the front page within 48 hours of the medians being released is unforgivable. The three-four weeks you have kept this thread up to date is no excuse for a lapse of this magnitude, especially when there is a spreadsheet maintained along with this thread.

Please stop putting any effort into this if you can't keep it up-to-date real-time. Thank you for your disservice to the TLS community.

User avatar
UVAIce
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby UVAIce » Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:30 pm

Minnesota put up its numbers:

LSAT
156/164/167

GPA
3.44/3.78/3.90

I can't remember when, if ever, they had numbers this bad.

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:31 pm

UVAIce wrote:Minnesota put up its numbers:

LSAT
156/164/167

GPA
3.44/3.78/3.90

I can't remember when, if ever, they had numbers this bad.


Oof.

User avatar
UVAIce
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:10 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby UVAIce » Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:34 pm

Also, Minnesota was pretty open about the fact that the school could not sustain the school with small class sizes such as the class of 2015. They openly stated they were dropping the quality of the student body to fill up the class rooms. Well, they succeeded in significantly dropping the quality of the student body and enrolling one more student compared to last year. Not looking good for the future of the law school.

User avatar
Nova
Posts: 9116
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Nova » Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:35 pm

Fuuuuuck

User avatar
Tiago Splitter
Posts: 15525
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Tiago Splitter » Fri Sep 20, 2013 2:43 pm

UVAIce wrote:Also, Minnesota was pretty open about the fact that the school could not sustain the school with small class sizes such as the class of 2015. They openly stated they were dropping the quality of the student body to fill up the class rooms. Well, they succeeded in significantly dropping the quality of the student body and enrolling one more student compared to last year. Not looking good for the future of the law school.

Haha wow. Minnesota went straight Illinois but without the cheating.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], LesPaul1995, missamerica, Nayanthika and 3 guests