C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
AT9
Posts: 1305
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby AT9 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 5:54 pm

MyNameIsFlynn! wrote:
kobe1020 wrote:by the way any Emory student can reveal what is the median LSAT for their class of 2016?


It's on the google doc


I think those were questioned because everything (including class size) stayed exactly the same except for a very slight increase in GPA...something like 3.7 flat to 3.7X.

User avatar
Dr.Zer0
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby Dr.Zer0 » Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:04 pm

Wrong thread lawl
Last edited by Dr.Zer0 on Thu Oct 31, 2013 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
snagglepuss
Posts: 1954
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:16 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby snagglepuss » Tue Oct 29, 2013 10:06 pm

Dr.Zer0 wrote:UT unsolicited, expires Nov. 1 I'm not even taking the LSAT till Dec. :lol:

wrong thread, bruh. Try again: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=212345

linkx13
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:27 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby linkx13 » Wed Oct 30, 2013 12:50 pm

AT9 wrote:
MyNameIsFlynn! wrote:
kobe1020 wrote:by the way any Emory student can reveal what is the median LSAT for their class of 2016?


It's on the google doc


I think those were questioned because everything (including class size) stayed exactly the same except for a very slight increase in GPA...something like 3.7 flat to 3.7X.


No one has their printed materials?

kobe1020
Posts: 419
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby kobe1020 » Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:14 pm

linkx13 wrote:
AT9 wrote:
MyNameIsFlynn! wrote:
kobe1020 wrote:by the way any Emory student can reveal what is the median LSAT for their class of 2016?


It's on the google doc


I think those were questioned because everything (including class size) stayed exactly the same except for a very slight increase in GPA...something like 3.7 flat to 3.7X.


No one has their printed materials?


I went to LSAC forum and didn't get anything from them

User avatar
jingosaur
Posts: 2223
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby jingosaur » Thu Oct 31, 2013 9:31 am

Does anybody know anything about Northwestern? Are we assuming at this point that they didn't hold the 170?

snapdragon25
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:43 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby snapdragon25 » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:04 am

jingosaur wrote:Does anybody know anything about Northwestern? Are we assuming at this point that they didn't hold the 170?


According to a handout I got from their admissions office, Northwestern is 169/3.75 with 177 students for the regular JD class. I'm not sure why someone keeps deleting this off the spreadsheet.

User avatar
jingosaur
Posts: 2223
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby jingosaur » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:09 am

snapdragon25 wrote:
jingosaur wrote:Does anybody know anything about Northwestern? Are we assuming at this point that they didn't hold the 170?


According to a handout I got from their admissions office, Northwestern is 169/3.75 with 177 students for the regular JD class. I'm not sure why someone keeps deleting this off the spreadsheet.


Do the LST numbers include Accelerated JD and JD/MBA students? Because if they don't, that's a CRAZY drop in students.

User avatar
midwest17
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby midwest17 » Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:13 am

jingosaur wrote:
snapdragon25 wrote:
jingosaur wrote:Does anybody know anything about Northwestern? Are we assuming at this point that they didn't hold the 170?


According to a handout I got from their admissions office, Northwestern is 169/3.75 with 177 students for the regular JD class. I'm not sure why someone keeps deleting this off the spreadsheet.


Do the LST numbers include Accelerated JD and JD/MBA students? Because if they don't, that's a CRAZY drop in students.


Last year Northwestern had 207 regular JD students: http://www.law.northwestern.edu/admissi ... ofile.html

kobe1020
Posts: 419
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby kobe1020 » Thu Oct 31, 2013 1:27 pm

snapdragon25 wrote:
jingosaur wrote:Does anybody know anything about Northwestern? Are we assuming at this point that they didn't hold the 170?


According to a handout I got from their admissions office, Northwestern is 169/3.75 with 177 students for the regular JD class. I'm not sure why someone keeps deleting this off the spreadsheet.


do you know the LSAT distribution of their accelerated JD program? thanks !

snapdragon25
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:43 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby snapdragon25 » Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:45 pm

kobe1020 wrote:
snapdragon25 wrote:
jingosaur wrote:Does anybody know anything about Northwestern? Are we assuming at this point that they didn't hold the 170?


According to a handout I got from their admissions office, Northwestern is 169/3.75 with 177 students for the regular JD class. I'm not sure why someone keeps deleting this off the spreadsheet.


do you know the LSAT distribution of their accelerated JD program? thanks !


I think the only info we have about the new #s is this handout, which only has medians for the regular JD. It said there are 55 people total in the accelerated JD and JD-MBA programs, but no medians for those people.

thereelfeels
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:56 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby thereelfeels » Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:36 pm

Pitt numbers: http://www.law.pitt.edu/admissions/class-profile

154/158(+0)/161
3.16/3.42(+.08)/3.61
174(-38)

dominiquewilkins
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 2:30 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby dominiquewilkins » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:15 pm

Maybe this has already been answered, but why did Washington and Lee go down so much? Refusal to give tuition discounts? Refusal to lower standards? Some other schools with similar employment information didn't drop as much.

BigZuck
Posts: 10881
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby BigZuck » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:22 pm

dominiquewilkins wrote:Maybe this has already been answered, but why did Washington and Lee go down so much? Refusal to give tuition discounts? Refusal to lower standards? Some other schools with similar employment information didn't drop as much.


Finally becoming as TTT as their employment stats IMO.

User avatar
stillwater
Posts: 3811
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby stillwater » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:24 pm

BigZuck wrote:
dominiquewilkins wrote:Maybe this has already been answered, but why did Washington and Lee go down so much? Refusal to give tuition discounts? Refusal to lower standards? Some other schools with similar employment information didn't drop as much.


Finally becoming as TTT as their employment stats IMO.


egregious quasi-W&M trolling.

User avatar
FKASunny
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby FKASunny » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:25 pm

BigZuck wrote:
dominiquewilkins wrote:Maybe this has already been answered, but why did Washington and Lee go down so much? Refusal to give tuition discounts? Refusal to lower standards? Some other schools with similar employment information didn't drop as much.


Finally becoming as TTT as their employment stats IMO.

Seriously. Their class size is minuscule and they still can't get respectable stats.

User avatar
stillwater
Posts: 3811
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby stillwater » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:25 pm

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
dominiquewilkins wrote:Maybe this has already been answered, but why did Washington and Lee go down so much? Refusal to give tuition discounts? Refusal to lower standards? Some other schools with similar employment information didn't drop as much.


Finally becoming as TTT as their employment stats IMO.

Seriously. Their class size is minuscule and they still can't get respectable stats.


truth of the matter is that in the 21st century people dont want to live in the sticks.

BigZuck
Posts: 10881
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby BigZuck » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:27 pm

stillwater wrote:
BigZuck wrote:
dominiquewilkins wrote:Maybe this has already been answered, but why did Washington and Lee go down so much? Refusal to give tuition discounts? Refusal to lower standards? Some other schools with similar employment information didn't drop as much.


Finally becoming as TTT as their employment stats IMO.


egregious quasi-W&M trolling.


:)

Naw bro, I'm all about dat T15 prestige whoring.

User avatar
FKASunny
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby FKASunny » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:28 pm

stillwater wrote:truth of the matter is that in the 21st century people dont want to live in the sticks.

What does that have anything to do with it? A lot of schools with decent stats or larger classes are far from their employment centers (Cornell, UVA, and Michigan in the T14, UGA, Florida, etc) and can manage to get more than 100 students hired. Only 87 of their 2012 grads were employed!

User avatar
FKASunny
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby FKASunny » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:29 pm

BigZuck wrote::)

Naw bro, I'm all about dat T15 prestige whoring.

Is T16 gonna be a thing once Texas falls this year?

User avatar
stillwater
Posts: 3811
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby stillwater » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:30 pm

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) wrote:
stillwater wrote:truth of the matter is that in the 21st century people dont want to live in the sticks.

What does that have anything to do with it? A lot of schools with decent stats or larger classes are far from their employment centers (Cornell, UVA, and Michigan in the T14, UGA, Florida, etc) and can manage to get more than 100 students hired. Only 87 of their 2012 grads were employed!


Okay, go to Lexington, VA, then go to where those schools are. They are virtual metropolises comparatively.

User avatar
stillwater
Posts: 3811
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby stillwater » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:31 pm

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) wrote:
BigZuck wrote::)

Naw bro, I'm all about dat T15 prestige whoring.

Is T16 gonna be a thing once Texas falls this year?


doubtful.

User avatar
FKASunny
Posts: 3904
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby FKASunny » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:32 pm

stillwater wrote:
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) wrote:
stillwater wrote:truth of the matter is that in the 21st century people dont want to live in the sticks.

What does that have anything to do with it? A lot of schools with decent stats or larger classes are far from their employment centers (Cornell, UVA, and Michigan in the T14, UGA, Florida, etc) and can manage to get more than 100 students hired. Only 87 of their 2012 grads were employed!


Okay, go to Lexington, VA, then go to where those schools are. They are virtual metropolises comparatively.

No, I just meant that a lot of people are content living in tiny cities if it means they have a shot at getting a job in a bigger city. Their location in Lexington matters a lot less than their inability to place grads in jobs.

BigZuck
Posts: 10881
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby BigZuck » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:33 pm

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) wrote:
BigZuck wrote::)

Naw bro, I'm all about dat T15 prestige whoring.

Is T16 gonna be a thing once Texas falls this year?


You shut your dirty mouth

Everyone knows UT is the one true 15th ranked school regardless of year to year fluctuations. At least I didn't claim it was a T14 :)

User avatar
stillwater
Posts: 3811
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size

Postby stillwater » Sun Nov 03, 2013 8:34 pm

BigZuck wrote:
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) wrote:
BigZuck wrote::)

Naw bro, I'm all about dat T15 prestige whoring.

Is T16 gonna be a thing once Texas falls this year?


You shut your dirty mouth

Everyone knows UT is the one true 15th ranked school regardless of year to year fluctuations. At least I didn't claim it was a T14 :)


its really just the T13, everyone knows that.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: kakistocracy, trooper10538 and 4 guests