C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size Forum
- bouleversement
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
We might see Penn at 169 after all.
- altoid99
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:04 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
BC posted.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Wow, I'm really impressed they held the 164.altoid99 wrote:BC posted.
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
and held the median gpa tooohpobrecito wrote:Wow, I'm really impressed they held the 164.altoid99 wrote:BC posted.
- altoid99
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:04 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
University of Washington also went official.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- altoid99
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:04 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
As did Penn State.
- AT9
- Posts: 1884
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:00 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
SMU, Alabama, and Emory need to get on the ball.
- longlivetheking
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:15 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
no chance penn's gonna fall to 169.bouleversement wrote:We might see Penn at 169 after all.
- bouleversement
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:50 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
What was the pre-release consensus on Northwestern?longlivetheking wrote:no chance penn's gonna fall to 169.bouleversement wrote:We might see Penn at 169 after all.
- cotiger
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Yeah, considering that Northwestern was throwing around 100k+ to almost everyone with a 170+ regardless of GPA and fell, while Penn kept things respectable on the GPA front and seemed relatively stingy with money makes me not that sure how they could keep it. Aren't all those 170/3.85 people going to go to CCN, who are giving just as much money or more to them than Penn is?bouleversement wrote:What was the pre-release consensus on Northwestern?longlivetheking wrote:no chance penn's gonna fall to 169.bouleversement wrote:We might see Penn at 169 after all.
On the other hand, Penn is one of the most admissions game-y schools out there, so wouldn't they start going crazy if they saw they might lose it?
Who knows..
- Yukos
- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Wouldn't be surprised if SLS dropped to 169. Don't think it would matter at all though.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I'm not saying Penn lost the 169 but UVA is super game-y as well and few people thought they would lose the 170 and they did.cotiger wrote:Yeah, considering that Northwestern was throwing around 100k+ to almost everyone with a 170+ regardless of GPA and fell, while Penn kept things respectable on the GPA front and seemed relatively stingy with money makes me not that sure how they could keep it. Aren't all those 170/3.85 people going to go to CCN, who are giving just as much money or more to them than Penn is?bouleversement wrote:What was the pre-release consensus on Northwestern?longlivetheking wrote:no chance penn's gonna fall to 169.bouleversement wrote:We might see Penn at 169 after all.
On the other hand, Penn is one of the most admissions game-y schools out there, so wouldn't they start going crazy if they saw they might lose it?
Who knows..
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
That 100k business is ridiculously untrue.cotiger wrote:Yeah, considering that Northwestern was throwing around 100k+ to almost everyone with a 170+ regardless of GPA and fell, while Penn kept things respectable on the GPA front and seemed relatively stingy with money makes me not that sure how they could keep it. Aren't all those 170/3.85 people going to go to CCN, who are giving just as much money or more to them than Penn is?bouleversement wrote:What was the pre-release consensus on Northwestern?longlivetheking wrote:no chance penn's gonna fall to 169.bouleversement wrote:We might see Penn at 169 after all.
On the other hand, Penn is one of the most admissions game-y schools out there, so wouldn't they start going crazy if they saw they might lose it?
Who knows..
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
longlivetheking wrote:
no chance penn's gonna fall to 169.
(penn adcom)
- longlivetheking
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:15 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Dr. Dre wrote:longlivetheking wrote:
no chance penn's gonna fall to 169.
(penn adcom)
169
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Lol for real.rebexness wrote: That 100k business is ridiculously untrue.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 1:07 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Why wouldn't you be surprised?Yukos wrote:Wouldn't be surprised if SLS dropped to 169. Don't think it would matter at all though.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sat Feb 14, 2015 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Wow.Regulus wrote:Not sure if I've seen that happen before...JurisDoctorSeuss wrote:Cornell posted their numbers:
2013 Entering Class (195 Matriculants)
25% GPA: 3.52
Median GPA: 3.66
75% GPA: 3.73
25% LSAT: 165
Median LSAT: 167
75% LSAT: 167
- cotiger
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Why do you say that? Looking at LSN, they gave 170s (NOT 170+s), with a 3.4+ GPA money 67% of the time at an average of 110k. And that's on the 92% (24 total, so not a super small sample) that they let in, another T14 high.rebexness wrote:That 100k business is ridiculously untrue.
Compare that to Penn, which at 170 and 3.8+ only gave money to 50% at an average of 50k. And that's on top of only letting 77% (20) in. That's a significant difference. So even when you adjust for the difference in tier of schools (ie Penn keeping it classy on the GPA front), NU was still much more aggressive trying to keep that 170.
Is there something I'm missing?
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Yeah, that's unusual. So at least a quarter of their class scored exactly a 167, and at least half of the class scored a 165, 166 or 167.ImNoScar wrote:Wow.Regulus wrote:Not sure if I've seen that happen before...JurisDoctorSeuss wrote:Cornell posted their numbers:
2013 Entering Class (195 Matriculants)
25% GPA: 3.52
Median GPA: 3.66
75% GPA: 3.73
25% LSAT: 165
Median LSAT: 167
75% LSAT: 167
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I had a 172 and I got less that $100K total from Northwestern (rec'd $90K). So the claim that all 170's were getting scholarships higher than mine doesnt compute. Its also not representative of the cycle itself, because I was there in the thread watching results and negotiations come in. There were plenty of 170s and 171s getting $30K and $60K total grantscotiger wrote:Why do you say that? Looking at LSN, they gave 170s (NOT 170+s), with a 3.4+ GPA money 67% of the time at an average of 110k. And that's on the 92% (24 total, so not a super small sample) that they let in, another T14 high.rebexness wrote:That 100k business is ridiculously untrue.
Compare that to Penn, which at 170 and 3.8+ only gave money to 50% at an average of 50k. And that's on top of only letting 77% (20) in. That's a significant difference. So even when you adjust for the difference in tier of schools (ie Penn keeping it classy on the GPA front), NU was still much more aggressive trying to keep that 170.
Is there something I'm missing?
- t14splitter
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:07 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
What you are missing is that they offer nearly a full ride (150k) to everyone who is accepted early decision. That will completely skew the scholarship money on LSN.cotiger wrote:Why do you say that? Looking at LSN, they gave 170s (NOT 170+s), with a 3.4+ GPA money 67% of the time at an average of 110k. And that's on the 92% (24 total, so not a super small sample) that they let in, another T14 high.rebexness wrote:That 100k business is ridiculously untrue.
Compare that to Penn, which at 170 and 3.8+ only gave money to 50% at an average of 50k. And that's on top of only letting 77% (20) in. That's a significant difference. So even when you adjust for the difference in tier of schools (ie Penn keeping it classy on the GPA front), NU was still much more aggressive trying to keep that 170.
Is there something I'm missing?
- cotiger
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I didn't say all got it, just most (67%). And the 110k is an average, so for sure not everyone is going to get that. But still, that means that a 170 had a most likely better than 50/50 chance at 100k from Northwestern, which is much, much better than anywhere else in the T14. "Almost everyone" was a bit of an exaggeration, but my underlying point that NU was whoring out for 170s way more than everyone else still stands.jbagelboy wrote:I had a 172 and I got less that $100K total from Northwestern (rec'd $90K). So the claim that all 170's were getting scholarships higher than mine doesnt compute. Its also not representative of the cycle itself, because I was there in the thread watching results and negotiations come in. There were plenty of 170s and 171s getting $30K and $60K total grantscotiger wrote:Why do you say that? Looking at LSN, they gave 170s (NOT 170+s), with a 3.4+ GPA money 67% of the time at an average of 110k. And that's on the 92% (24 total, so not a super small sample) that they let in, another T14 high.rebexness wrote:That 100k business is ridiculously untrue.
Compare that to Penn, which at 170 and 3.8+ only gave money to 50% at an average of 50k. And that's on top of only letting 77% (20) in. That's a significant difference. So even when you adjust for the difference in tier of schools (ie Penn keeping it classy on the GPA front), NU was still much more aggressive trying to keep that 170.
Is there something I'm missing?
Also, that LSN data for NU is 26 data points for 170 and 3.4+. Stretch that to 170-172, and it becomes 62 data points with similar results. Did last year's thread have so many more people in those score ranges that it would be more accurate than LSN? (note: I don't actually know how many people join those threads).
No, that LSN search excluded ED.t14splitter wrote:What you are missing is that they offer nearly a full ride (150k) to everyone who is accepted early decision. That will completely skew the scholarship money on LSN.
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
That is a very narrow range, but a 167 75th is very low for a T14.ScottRiqui wrote:Yeah, that's unusual. So at least a quarter of their class scored exactly a 167, and at least half of the class scored a 165, 166 or 167.ImNoScar wrote:Wow.Regulus wrote:Not sure if I've seen that happen before...JurisDoctorSeuss wrote:Cornell posted their numbers:
2013 Entering Class (195 Matriculants)
25% GPA: 3.52
Median GPA: 3.66
75% GPA: 3.73
25% LSAT: 165
Median LSAT: 167
75% LSAT: 167
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login