Thats some sneaky ass shit. Most schools use "admitted students" to refer to students who actually enter the school.Tiago Splitter wrote:Cause it's higher.Dr. Dre wrote:USF's LSAT median: 153
NOT FLAME
http://www.usfca.edu/law/jd/admissions/profile/
Also, why do they put the LSAT median of the people who got accepted?
C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size Forum
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
.
Last edited by North on Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
That feeder school list bums me out.Dr. Dre wrote:USF's LSAT median: 153
NOT FLAME
http://www.usfca.edu/law/jd/admissions/profile/
Also, why do they put the LSAT median of the people who got accepted?
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Why?moonman157 wrote:That feeder school list bums me out.Dr. Dre wrote:USF's LSAT median: 153
NOT FLAME
http://www.usfca.edu/law/jd/admissions/profile/
Also, why do they put the LSAT median of the people who got accepted?
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Columbia, Berkeley, Cornell, Michigan...do these graduates honestly not have better options than USFCA?danquayle wrote:Why?moonman157 wrote:That feeder school list bums me out.Dr. Dre wrote:USF's LSAT median: 153
NOT FLAME
http://www.usfca.edu/law/jd/admissions/profile/
Also, why do they put the LSAT median of the people who got accepted?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
North wrote: I think what he's getting at is that it's not really flattering at all.
.
THIS is the credited response.
They are basically saying, yeah we accepted people with such and such numbers BUT most of them didn't matriculate because they matriculated to beTTTer schools
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Dittomoonman157 wrote:That feeder school list bums me out.Dr. Dre wrote:USF's LSAT median: 153
NOT FLAME
http://www.usfca.edu/law/jd/admissions/profile/
Also, why do they put the LSAT median of the people who got accepted?
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
After living in the TLS bubble, it's funny to think that even people with a 155 have the option to look at a particular school's acceptance and say "yeah - thanks, but no thanks".Dr. Dre wrote:North wrote: I think what he's getting at is that it's not really flattering at all.
.
THIS is the credited response.
They are basically saying, yeah we accepted people with such and such numbers BUT most of them didn't matriculate because they matriculated to beTTTer schools
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
I went to Michigan for UG. I know for at least Michigan (and probably Berk), there were just tons of undergrads that wanted to go into law. Michigan is a top feeder for almost for every law school I've seen. I'm guessing its similar for Columbia and Cornell. There are so-so students at even the very best schools. IIRC, even Harvard only has a 163 median LSAT amongst its undergrad students. (Think it was 158 at UM)moonman157 wrote:Columbia, Berkeley, Cornell, Michigan...do these graduates honestly not have better options than USFCA?danquayle wrote:Why?moonman157 wrote:That feeder school list bums me out.Dr. Dre wrote:USF's LSAT median: 153
NOT FLAME
http://www.usfca.edu/law/jd/admissions/profile/
Also, why do they put the LSAT median of the people who got accepted?
Now if you're asking whether they have better options for careers outside of law, they probably do. But lack of information and delusional self-evaluation is unfortunately still rampant, and plenty of people who would worsen their careers by attending law school still do.
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Absolutely, it's just always depressing to be reminded that this is the case. Some of these schools surprised me both because of their size and their pedigree. Columbia and Cornell (if I remember correctly) are two of the larger Ivies, but they're not THAT huge compared to large schools nationally, and seem like two random schools to be feeding into USFCA ahead of other large schools. Berkeley and UCLA make more sense, being in CA, but still...to go from there to USF...kinda sad.
- danquayle
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Yessir. TLS still has more work to do.moonman157 wrote:Absolutely, it's just always depressing to be reminded that this is the case. Some of these schools surprised me both because of their size and their pedigree. Columbia and Cornell (if I remember correctly) are two of the larger Ivies, but they're not THAT huge compared to large schools nationally, and seem like two random schools to be feeding into USFCA ahead of other large schools. Berkeley and UCLA make more sense, being in CA, but still...to go from there to USF...kinda sad.
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
If anyone is paying sticker for an expensive UG (All ivies included) they are probably also getting ripped off pretty dramatically. Higher education in general is a joke as far as price is concerned (at face value) as of now. I just don't care as much because those who pay sticker likely (maybe?) derive more than just a job from attending and those that cannot afford the schools generally receive massive aid.
Harvard UG LSAT median is a 167 btw; tied for best but Umich is 159/Cornell 162/Columbia 164;
Harvard UG LSAT median is a 167 btw; tied for best but Umich is 159/Cornell 162/Columbia 164;
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
moonman157 wrote:Absolutely, it's just always depressing to be reminded that this is the case. Some of these schools surprised me both because of their size and their pedigree. Columbia and Cornell (if I remember correctly) are two of the larger Ivies, but they're not THAT huge compared to large schools nationally, and seem like two random schools to be feeding into USFCA ahead of other large schools. Berkeley and UCLA make more sense, being in CA, but still...to go from there to USF...kinda sad.
for those that go from TTT UG —> T13, this is their song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEpDiHNoSkw
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr.Zer0
- Posts: 1027
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Dr. Dre wrote:moonman157 wrote:Absolutely, it's just always depressing to be reminded that this is the case. Some of these schools surprised me both because of their size and their pedigree. Columbia and Cornell (if I remember correctly) are two of the larger Ivies, but they're not THAT huge compared to large schools nationally, and seem like two random schools to be feeding into USFCA ahead of other large schools. Berkeley and UCLA make more sense, being in CA, but still...to go from there to USF...kinda sad.
for those that go from TTT UG —> T13, this is their song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEpDiHNoSkw
-
- Posts: 4075
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Is there a complete list of this anywhere? I think this would be pretty interesting to see.sinfiery wrote:Harvard UG LSAT median is a 167 btw; tied for best but Umich is 159/Cornell 162/Columbia 164;
- moonman157
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:26 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Dr.Zer0 wrote:Dr. Dre wrote:moonman157 wrote:Absolutely, it's just always depressing to be reminded that this is the case. Some of these schools surprised me both because of their size and their pedigree. Columbia and Cornell (if I remember correctly) are two of the larger Ivies, but they're not THAT huge compared to large schools nationally, and seem like two random schools to be feeding into USFCA ahead of other large schools. Berkeley and UCLA make more sense, being in CA, but still...to go from there to USF...kinda sad.
for those that go from TTT UG —> T13, this is their song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEpDiHNoSkw
- FKASunny
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
My UG's average LSAT was something like 145. I hope most of them gave up on law school...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
There's not much merit aid at top schools for undergrad, but they are very generous with need-based. If anyone is paying sticker it's because their parents can afford it.sinfiery wrote:If anyone is paying sticker for an expensive UG (All ivies included) they are probably also getting ripped off pretty dramatically. Higher education in general is a joke as far as price is concerned (at face value) as of now. I just don't care as much because those who pay sticker likely (maybe?) derive more than just a job from attending and those that cannot afford the schools generally receive massive aid.
Harvard UG LSAT median is a 167 btw; tied for best but Umich is 159/Cornell 162/Columbia 164;
- MKC
- Posts: 16246
- Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Just because their parents can pay for it doesn't mean they actually are. Those numbers at some point said that my expected family contribution was $27,000 a year. I got zero dollars. (from the school or my parents)shifty_eyed wrote:There's not much merit aid at top schools for undergrad, but they are very generous with need-based. If anyone is paying sticker it's because their parents can afford it.sinfiery wrote:If anyone is paying sticker for an expensive UG (All ivies included) they are probably also getting ripped off pretty dramatically. Higher education in general is a joke as far as price is concerned (at face value) as of now. I just don't care as much because those who pay sticker likely (maybe?) derive more than just a job from attending and those that cannot afford the schools generally receive massive aid.
Harvard UG LSAT median is a 167 btw; tied for best but Umich is 159/Cornell 162/Columbia 164;
- sinfiery
- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Very true; Just be glad we don't do any further economic analysis verging on how EFC unconnected to what you actually receive benefits you indirectly because of a particular living environment because it could create an even greater disparity in relation to what you are speaking of (or fix the greatest disparity that likely assists those in said previous environment more than those they wish to be compared to)MarkinKansasCity wrote: Just because their parents can pay for it doesn't mean they actually are. Those numbers at some point said that my expected family contribution was $27,000 a year. I got zero dollars. (from the school or my parents)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... DNSbUNtZ1Ecannibal ox wrote:Is there a complete list of this anywhere? I think this would be pretty interesting to see.sinfiery wrote:Harvard UG LSAT median is a 167 btw; tied for best but Umich is 159/Cornell 162/Columbia 164;
YeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhbuddddyDr. Dre wrote: for those that go from TTT UG —> T13, this is their song
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEpDiHNoSkw
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sat Feb 14, 2015 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
It's not surprising at all.Regulus wrote:It is interesting how closely the LSAT scores match the USNWR undergrad rankings.sinfiery wrote:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... DNSbUNtZ1E
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
Regulus wrote:It is interesting how closely the LSAT scores match the USNWR undergrad rankings.sinfiery wrote:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... DNSbUNtZ1E
notice also the moar prestigious the school is, the higher the average gpa
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
It's really weird how they put both. So the students that end up attending have a median LSAT significantly lower (2 points is significant..) than the 25th percentile LSAT of admitted students. Really don't know why they would include that. TTTT.danquayle wrote:Thats some sneaky ass shit. Most schools use "admitted students" to refer to students who actually enter the school.Tiago Splitter wrote:Cause it's higher.Dr. Dre wrote:USF's LSAT median: 153
NOT FLAME
http://www.usfca.edu/law/jd/admissions/profile/
Also, why do they put the LSAT median of the people who got accepted?
- wtrc
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: C/O 2016 median lsat/gpa/class size
It does seem like most the schools here are above the 151 national average though. What are we missing? Community colleges and smaller colleges?shifty_eyed wrote:It's not surprising at all.Regulus wrote:It is interesting how closely the LSAT scores match the USNWR undergrad rankings.sinfiery wrote:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... DNSbUNtZ1E
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login