LSAC: Applicants: -15.9% Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
User avatar
RetakeFrenzy

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by RetakeFrenzy » Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:37 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:Some schools (like Emory) have their deadline pass. But are quietly still keeping the app open.
Yeah... I remember reading last year about how schools do that :|

pinkyandthebrain

New
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:25 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by pinkyandthebrain » Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:27 pm

RetakeFrenzy wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:Some schools (like Emory) have their deadline pass. But are quietly still keeping the app open.
Yeah... I remember reading last year about how schools do that :|
Hah, at Emory we don't even have a deadline, we have a 'priority deadline'
The priority deadline for Fall 2013 has been extended to March 15th due to internet service issues with the http://www.lsac.org application portal.
No need to take the LSAT prior to June of the year you wish to enroll!

User avatar
RSterling

Bronze
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by RSterling » Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:40 pm

Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?

User avatar
JXander

Silver
Posts: 966
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by JXander » Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:57 pm

RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?

User avatar
Ruxin1

Silver
Posts: 1275
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:12 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by Ruxin1 » Wed Apr 10, 2013 4:58 pm

JXander wrote:
RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunately

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


wannabelawstudent

Gold
Posts: 2578
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by wannabelawstudent » Wed Apr 10, 2013 5:05 pm

Ruxin1 wrote:
JXander wrote:
RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunately
This is right, we won't know until Julyish I believe.

User avatar
99.9luft

Silver
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by 99.9luft » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:23 pm

JXander wrote:
RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
i read somewhere on TLS that the biggest decline this was in the 170-174 applicants group, followed by the 174+ group. We'll have to wait to find out officially...

User avatar
loomstate

Bronze
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:07 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by loomstate » Wed Apr 10, 2013 6:29 pm

last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.

http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html

User avatar
RetakeFrenzy

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by RetakeFrenzy » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:34 pm

loomstate wrote:last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.

http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
Really hope history repeats itself :)

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
lhanvt13

Gold
Posts: 2378
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by lhanvt13 » Wed Apr 10, 2013 8:50 pm

RetakeFrenzy wrote:
loomstate wrote:last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.

http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
Really hope history repeats itself :)
meaning a drastic and unnecessary increase in applicants :lol: or a continuous drop in applicants?

User avatar
RetakeFrenzy

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by RetakeFrenzy » Wed Apr 10, 2013 9:59 pm

lhanvt13 wrote:
RetakeFrenzy wrote:
loomstate wrote:last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.

http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
Really hope history repeats itself :)
meaning a drastic and unnecessary increase in applicants :lol: or a continuous drop in applicants?
Of course the latter!

User avatar
lhanvt13

Gold
Posts: 2378
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by lhanvt13 » Wed Apr 10, 2013 10:44 pm

RetakeFrenzy wrote:
Of course the latter!
that smiley is misleading. that was supposed to be the :twisted: .
anyway yeah. this is a good trend. KEEP IT UP

User avatar
KevinP

Silver
Posts: 1322
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by KevinP » Wed Apr 10, 2013 11:35 pm

Ruxin1 wrote:
JXander wrote:
RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunately
This information actually does not get released; it is available only to member law schools. Last year's numbers were available because of a leak/security issue (the members-only link was available to anyone, but LSAC fixed it).

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
RetakeFrenzy

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by RetakeFrenzy » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:15 am

lhanvt13 wrote:
RetakeFrenzy wrote:
Of course the latter!
that smiley is misleading. that was supposed to be the :twisted: .
anyway yeah. this is a good trend. KEEP IT UP
Yes right :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

User avatar
99.9luft

Silver
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by 99.9luft » Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:16 am

KevinP wrote:
Ruxin1 wrote:
JXander wrote:
RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunately
This information actually does not get released; it is available only to member law schools. Last year's numbers were available because of a leak/security issue (the members-only link was available to anyone, but LSAC fixed it).
i was expecting your post on this. :lol:

User avatar
KevinP

Silver
Posts: 1322
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by KevinP » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:37 pm

99.9luft wrote: i was expecting your post on this. :lol:
I still check TLS from time to time ;)
only a matter of time before I'm gone for good

User avatar
99.9luft

Silver
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by 99.9luft » Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:44 am

KevinP wrote:
99.9luft wrote: i was expecting your post on this. :lol:
I still check TLS from time to time ;)
only a matter of time before I'm gone for good
same here.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


T4Rockstar

New
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:03 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by T4Rockstar » Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:20 am

Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy. ;)

User avatar
togepi

Silver
Posts: 533
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 10:13 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by togepi » Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:28 am

T4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy. ;)
pics or it didn't happen

shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by shntn » Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:09 am

T4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy. ;)
lol

T4Rockstar

New
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:03 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by T4Rockstar » Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:12 am

togepi wrote:
T4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy. ;)
pics or it didn't happen

LMAO! I would actually post one if I didn't just delete my FB for the bar character and fitness. That application is intense btw!

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


hephaestus

Gold
Posts: 2399
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by hephaestus » Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:19 am

T4Rockstar wrote:
togepi wrote:
T4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy. ;)
pics or it didn't happen

LMAO! I would actually post one if I didn't just delete my FB for the bar character and fitness. That application is intense btw!
Bad troll.

bcandybc

New
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:38 am

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by bcandybc » Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:26 pm

no update on LSAC for 2 weeks. wonder how bad the april #s were.

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp

User avatar
Rahviveh

Gold
Posts: 2333
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by Rahviveh » Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:02 pm

KevinP wrote:
99.9luft wrote: i was expecting your post on this. :lol:
I still check TLS from time to time ;)
only a matter of time before I'm gone for good
Can you pull the LSAC data early one last time? for old times sake? :D

prāna

New
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:19 pm

Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%

Post by prāna » Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:12 pm

bcandybc wrote:no update on LSAC for 2 weeks. wonder how bad the april #s were.

http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp
we're at 91%...don't think the new data will change the picture much. If not tomorrow, then they'll likely update it next friday.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”