Yeah... I remember reading last year about how schools do thatwannabelawstudent wrote:Some schools (like Emory) have their deadline pass. But are quietly still keeping the app open.
LSAC: Applicants: -15.9% Forum
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:25 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Hah, at Emory we don't even have a deadline, we have a 'priority deadline'RetakeFrenzy wrote:Yeah... I remember reading last year about how schools do thatwannabelawstudent wrote:Some schools (like Emory) have their deadline pass. But are quietly still keeping the app open.
No need to take the LSAT prior to June of the year you wish to enroll!The priority deadline for Fall 2013 has been extended to March 15th due to internet service issues with the http://www.lsac.org application portal.
- RSterling
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
- Ruxin1
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:12 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunatelyJXander wrote:RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
This is right, we won't know until Julyish I believe.Ruxin1 wrote:I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunatelyJXander wrote:RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
- 99.9luft
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
i read somewhere on TLS that the biggest decline this was in the 170-174 applicants group, followed by the 174+ group. We'll have to wait to find out officially...JXander wrote:RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
- loomstate
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:07 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.
http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Really hope history repeats itselfloomstate wrote:last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.
http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
meaning a drastic and unnecessary increase in applicants or a continuous drop in applicants?RetakeFrenzy wrote:Really hope history repeats itselfloomstate wrote:last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.
http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Of course the latter!lhanvt13 wrote:meaning a drastic and unnecessary increase in applicants or a continuous drop in applicants?RetakeFrenzy wrote:Really hope history repeats itselfloomstate wrote:last year's data: The number of applicants whose highest LSAT scores were 170-174 (97th-99th percentiles) declined by 20.7%, while the number of applicants whose highest scores were 140-144 (13th-23rd percentiles) and below 140 dropped by only 6.2% and 4.3%, respectively. The number of applicants with other LSAT scores generally decreased anywhere from approximately 14%-19%.
http://lsatblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/ ... mbers.html
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
that smiley is misleading. that was supposed to be the .RetakeFrenzy wrote:
Of course the latter!
anyway yeah. this is a good trend. KEEP IT UP
- KevinP
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
This information actually does not get released; it is available only to member law schools. Last year's numbers were available because of a leak/security issue (the members-only link was available to anyone, but LSAC fixed it).Ruxin1 wrote:I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunatelyJXander wrote:RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RetakeFrenzy
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Yes rightlhanvt13 wrote:that smiley is misleading. that was supposed to be the .RetakeFrenzy wrote:
Of course the latter!
anyway yeah. this is a good trend. KEEP IT UP
- 99.9luft
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
i was expecting your post on this.KevinP wrote:This information actually does not get released; it is available only to member law schools. Last year's numbers were available because of a leak/security issue (the members-only link was available to anyone, but LSAC fixed it).Ruxin1 wrote:I believe this gets released well after the cycle ends unfortunatelyJXander wrote:RSterling wrote:Is there a breakdown of applicant numbers by lsat score?
- KevinP
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
I still check TLS from time to time99.9luft wrote: i was expecting your post on this.
only a matter of time before I'm gone for good
- 99.9luft
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
same here.KevinP wrote:I still check TLS from time to time99.9luft wrote: i was expecting your post on this.
only a matter of time before I'm gone for good
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:03 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy.
- togepi
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 10:13 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
pics or it didn't happenT4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
lolT4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 7:03 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
togepi wrote:pics or it didn't happenT4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy.
LMAO! I would actually post one if I didn't just delete my FB for the bar character and fitness. That application is intense btw!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2399
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Bad troll.T4Rockstar wrote:togepi wrote:pics or it didn't happenT4Rockstar wrote:Hmm... 2.7 GPA and 152 LSAT. I got some awesome scholarships, albeit to crappy schools. I think I'm going to attend anyways. A free education in this economy... Why not? And you guys are all crazy for thinking that there is no money in law. When your a 6'4" total stud, everything is easy.
LMAO! I would actually post one if I didn't just delete my FB for the bar character and fitness. That application is intense btw!
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:38 am
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
no update on LSAC for 2 weeks. wonder how bad the april #s were.
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
Can you pull the LSAC data early one last time? for old times sake?KevinP wrote:I still check TLS from time to time99.9luft wrote: i was expecting your post on this.
only a matter of time before I'm gone for good
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: LSAC: Applicants: -15.9%
we're at 91%...don't think the new data will change the picture much. If not tomorrow, then they'll likely update it next friday.bcandybc wrote:no update on LSAC for 2 weeks. wonder how bad the april #s were.
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... volume.asp
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login