Page 1 of 8

offensive post

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:43 am
by simplycatalina
IMO.

--LinkRemoved--

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:53 am
by ManOfTheMinute
cbarlow1016 wrote:Why is it that the majority are male?

Also, in what world is this funny rather than offensive? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater


Image

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:55 am
by simplycatalina
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
cbarlow1016 wrote:Why is it that the majority are male?

Also, in what world is this funny rather than offensive? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater


Image


Ok, so they score slightly higher. Still, does that excuse the above behavior?

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:00 am
by ManOfTheMinute
cbarlow1016 wrote:Ok, so they score slightly higher. Still, does that excuse the above behavior?


Yeah, I got nothing for that.

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:01 am
by Crowing
you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:03 am
by ManOfTheMinute
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:08 am
by simplycatalina
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


.

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:12 am
by suralin
...what does the fact that there are more male LSAT instructors have to do with the humor (or lack thereof) of that image? :?

I find both that implicit assumption and the image itself offensive, by the way.

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:13 am
by dr123
cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.


why'd you delete the OP then?

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:13 am
by Crowing
cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.


that escalated quickly

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:16 am
by ManOfTheMinute
cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.


Whattt?? How was that being an asshole? I was merely stating that you must be super into anonymity given that you username is your first initial and your last name. Jeeez

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:18 am
by Crowing
i don't see how that's offensive anyway. it's not like that picture is endorsing chris brown or his behavior.

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:22 am
by simplycatalina
Crowing wrote:
cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:23 am
by warandpeace
OP, you're cute

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:26 am
by A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


lol

Re: LSAT Instructors

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:26 am
by ManOfTheMinute
cbarlow1016 wrote:because i'm sick of people on tls attacking me. i'm simply trying to bring up a specific issue, or more specifically domestic violence, which i'm unfortunately very familiar with, and i get attacked within 5 minutes of posting something. pm me if you want info, it's just incredibly disheartening to get repeatedly attacked for something when you're just trying to shed light on a situation that so many people face everyday. i don't want to deal with petty gossip or stupid attacks.


I still do not see how I attacked you... seriously, please explain. PM me if you don't wanna say it here

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:26 am
by Crowing
nobody attacked you itt. chill the fuck out.

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:28 am
by A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
Crowing wrote:nobody attacked you itt. chill the fuck out.


I thought it was nice of you to warn her.

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:29 am
by warandpeace
ITT: hormones rage rampage

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:29 am
by simplycatalina
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:31 am
by A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
cbarlow1016 wrote:
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


k guess no one wants to have a serious conversation on here and who would care about women's rights/domestic abuse so nbd.


I thought it was a nice thing to say.

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:31 am
by ManOfTheMinute
cbarlow1016 wrote:
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


k guess no one wants to have a serious conversation on here and who would care about women's rights/domestic abuse so nbd.


First, I wanna know how you think I attacked you... such a disconnect has to be a starting point to any rational discussion.

warandpeace wrote:ITT: hormones rage rampage


And stuff like this aint gonna help me get no answers

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:32 am
by warandpeace
OP, I'm not speaking for anyone here but myself, but I care as I am a woman. I was just complimenting you. Please calm down and do not take the interwebz seriously.

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:33 am
by warandpeace
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:
cbarlow1016 wrote:
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


k guess no one wants to have a serious conversation on here and who would care about women's rights/domestic abuse so nbd.


I thought it was a nice thing to say.


I thought so, as well

Re: .

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:34 am
by John_rizzy_rawls
Your tar would be the most annoying female character in Dexter history.