offensive post

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
simplycatalina
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm

offensive post

Postby simplycatalina » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:43 am

IMO.

--LinkRemoved--
Last edited by simplycatalina on Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:18 pm, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:53 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:Why is it that the majority are male?

Also, in what world is this funny rather than offensive? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater


Image

User avatar
simplycatalina
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby simplycatalina » Wed Jan 30, 2013 2:55 am

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
cbarlow1016 wrote:Why is it that the majority are male?

Also, in what world is this funny rather than offensive? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =1&theater


Image


Ok, so they score slightly higher. Still, does that excuse the above behavior?

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:00 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:Ok, so they score slightly higher. Still, does that excuse the above behavior?


Yeah, I got nothing for that.

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby Crowing » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:01 am

you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:03 am

Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is

User avatar
simplycatalina
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby simplycatalina » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:08 am

ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


.
Last edited by simplycatalina on Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
suralin
better than you
Posts: 15038
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am

Re: .

Postby suralin » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:12 am

...what does the fact that there are more male LSAT instructors have to do with the humor (or lack thereof) of that image? :?

I find both that implicit assumption and the image itself offensive, by the way.

User avatar
dr123
Posts: 3503
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby dr123 » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:13 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.


why'd you delete the OP then?

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby Crowing » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:13 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.


that escalated quickly

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:16 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.


Whattt?? How was that being an asshole? I was merely stating that you must be super into anonymity given that you username is your first initial and your last name. Jeeez

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: .

Postby Crowing » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:18 am

i don't see how that's offensive anyway. it's not like that picture is endorsing chris brown or his behavior.

User avatar
simplycatalina
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby simplycatalina » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:22 am

Crowing wrote:
cbarlow1016 wrote:
ManOfTheMinute wrote:
Crowing wrote:you should probably not out yourself on facebook like that


Have you seen her TLS username? She's not worried about adcoms knowing who she is


no i'm not because i have absolutely nothing to hide but if you wanna be an asshole go for it.
Last edited by simplycatalina on Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:10 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
warandpeace
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm

Re: .

Postby warandpeace » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:23 am

OP, you're cute

User avatar
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: .

Postby A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:26 am

warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


lol

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: LSAT Instructors

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:26 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:because i'm sick of people on tls attacking me. i'm simply trying to bring up a specific issue, or more specifically domestic violence, which i'm unfortunately very familiar with, and i get attacked within 5 minutes of posting something. pm me if you want info, it's just incredibly disheartening to get repeatedly attacked for something when you're just trying to shed light on a situation that so many people face everyday. i don't want to deal with petty gossip or stupid attacks.


I still do not see how I attacked you... seriously, please explain. PM me if you don't wanna say it here

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: .

Postby Crowing » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:26 am

nobody attacked you itt. chill the fuck out.

User avatar
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: .

Postby A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:28 am

Crowing wrote:nobody attacked you itt. chill the fuck out.


I thought it was nice of you to warn her.

User avatar
warandpeace
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm

Re: .

Postby warandpeace » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:29 am

ITT: hormones rage rampage

User avatar
simplycatalina
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 7:41 pm

Re: .

Postby simplycatalina » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:29 am

warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute
Last edited by simplycatalina on Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: .

Postby A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:31 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


k guess no one wants to have a serious conversation on here and who would care about women's rights/domestic abuse so nbd.


I thought it was a nice thing to say.

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute
Posts: 1562
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: .

Postby ManOfTheMinute » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:31 am

cbarlow1016 wrote:
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


k guess no one wants to have a serious conversation on here and who would care about women's rights/domestic abuse so nbd.


First, I wanna know how you think I attacked you... such a disconnect has to be a starting point to any rational discussion.

warandpeace wrote:ITT: hormones rage rampage


And stuff like this aint gonna help me get no answers

User avatar
warandpeace
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm

Re: .

Postby warandpeace » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:32 am

OP, I'm not speaking for anyone here but myself, but I care as I am a woman. I was just complimenting you. Please calm down and do not take the interwebz seriously.

User avatar
warandpeace
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:43 pm

Re: .

Postby warandpeace » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:33 am

A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:
cbarlow1016 wrote:
warandpeace wrote:OP, you're cute


k guess no one wants to have a serious conversation on here and who would care about women's rights/domestic abuse so nbd.


I thought it was a nice thing to say.


I thought so, as well

User avatar
John_rizzy_rawls
Posts: 3477
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:44 pm

Re: .

Postby John_rizzy_rawls » Wed Jan 30, 2013 3:34 am

Your tar would be the most annoying female character in Dexter history.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests