Worst Cycles Ever Forum
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Worst Cycles Ever
ITT we post links to LSN profiles that keep us awake at night. I'm talking really bad. Like WTF.
Note: if i says in the comments there was a serious C&F issue or something like that then take that in to account.
175-180
3.97 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
3.79 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
3.6 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
3.5 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/JammasterJ/jd Ended okay, but no acceptances till May.
3.4 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/juju96
Link em and I'll add them to the OP.
Note: if i says in the comments there was a serious C&F issue or something like that then take that in to account.
175-180
3.97 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
3.79 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
3.6 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
3.5 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/JammasterJ/jd Ended okay, but no acceptances till May.
3.4 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/juju96
Link em and I'll add them to the OP.
Last edited by wert3813 on Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:07 am, edited 3 times in total.
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
You know people can lie on the internet dood
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
bizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.
.....maybe they didn't want to think about it anymore because they felt they under performed. Shadenfreude much, brah?
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Well we should definitely just not have the internet then.dr123 wrote:You know people can lie on the internet dood
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
, , , . But Al Gore could never ever take credit for having "invented" it in the first place.wert3813 wrote:Well we should definitely just not have the internet then.dr123 wrote:You know people can lie on the internet dood
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
In all seriousness the fact that you can make a fake LSN shouldn't matter here.
- Richie Tenenbaum
- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Bolded got Columbia with 25K/yr with a 175/3.6. How is that really bad? Isn't that as about as good as that dude can do with that GPA? I had a 174/3.56 (multiple takes) and got shut out of CCN.wert3813 wrote:ITT we post links to LSN profiles that keep us awake at night. I'm talking really bad. Like WTF.
Note: if is says in the comments there was a serious C&F issue or something like that then take that in to account.
175-180
3.97 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
3.79 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
3.6 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
Link em and I'll add them to the OP.
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
LOL okaybizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.
- Jpreece59
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:26 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
This one is bad, but maybe not terrible (170/4.0):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Anihawk/jd
This one certainly could have been better (176/3.85):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/izy223/jd
Here's a 171/3.98 URM who got WL at HLS, CLS, and NYU:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Allyn/jd
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Anihawk/jd
This one certainly could have been better (176/3.85):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/izy223/jd
Here's a 171/3.98 URM who got WL at HLS, CLS, and NYU:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Allyn/jd
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Knowing this information would be tremendously helpful for future applicants. I bet a lot of these guys just "mailed it in" with their personal statements and overall applications. They thought to themselves: I have great numbers; therefore, I do not have to try at all with my apps.Suralin wrote:LOL okaybizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.
- BerkeleyBear
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:22 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
180 3.97 seemed to have the worst luck so far. Would've thought U. Chicago and Berkeley would have tried snagging that person. Do you guys think the super high LSAT and GPA hurt this applicant for schools below HYS, for YP?
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
So, based on this assumption (which you pulled directly from your ass), you call these people who had admittedly rough cycles given their numbers, douchebags. Yeah, good for you, champ.bizzybone1313 wrote:Knowing this information would be tremendously helpful for future applicants. I bet a lot of these guys just "mailed it in" with their personal statements and overall applications. They thought to themselves: I have great numbers; therefore, I do not have to try at all with my apps.Suralin wrote:LOL okaybizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Yeah I went back and forth on whether to include it because of that offer. In the end I decided to because 1 T14 with those numbers is absurd.Richie Tenenbaum wrote:Bolded got Columbia with 25K/yr with a 175/3.6. How is that really bad? Isn't that as about as good as that dude can do with that GPA? I had a 174/3.56 (multiple takes) and got shut out of CCN.wert3813 wrote:ITT we post links to LSN profiles that keep us awake at night. I'm talking really bad. Like WTF.
Note: if is says in the comments there was a serious C&F issue or something like that then take that in to account.
175-180
3.97 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/carterth
3.79 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/BaiAilian2013
3.6 http://lawschoolnumbers.com/cg23/jd
Link em and I'll add them to the OP.
- BerkeleyBear
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:22 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
It's like Berkeley enjoys being unpredictable and random. That URM has such a nice GPA and LSAT combo.Jpreece59 wrote:This one is bad, but maybe not terrible (170/4.0):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Anihawk/jd
This one certainly could have been better (176/3.85):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/izy223/jd
Here's a 171/3.98 URM who got WL at HLS, CLS, and NYU:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Allyn/jd
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
I think YP is somewhat overstated on this website. To be clear I think it absolutely exists and happens somewhat often, but TLS makes it seem as though ever candidate who gets WL or ding where they are at or above both medians is a YP. Not so. The process is hugely numbers driven, but adcoms do turn down people for things other than numbers.BerkeleyBear wrote:180 3.97 seemed to have the worst luck so far. Would've thought U. Chicago and Berkeley would have tried snagging that person. Do you guys think the super high LSAT and GPA hurt this applicant for schools below HYS, for YP?
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Hold up a minute, I thought Puerto Rican didn't get a URM boost.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.bjsesq wrote:So, based on this assumption (which you pulled directly from your ass), you call these people who had admittedly rough cycles given their numbers, douchebags. Yeah, good for you, champ.bizzybone1313 wrote:Knowing this information would be tremendously helpful for future applicants. I bet a lot of these guys just "mailed it in" with their personal statements and overall applications. They thought to themselves: I have great numbers; therefore, I do not have to try at all with my apps.Suralin wrote:LOL okaybizzybone1313 wrote:Great idea OP. Too bad those douche bags never explained why they had a bad cycle. There has to be a reason. C&F issues? I think most profiles are real. Some people just are real unlucky. I bet some lower ranked schools thought they would never attend, so they YP'ed them.
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Leaving this one off because they didn't update to completion and it was during a fairly competitive cycle.Jpreece59 wrote:This one is bad, but maybe not terrible (170/4.0):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Anihawk/jd
Not quite bad enough.Jpreece59 wrote:This one certainly could have been better (176/3.85):
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/izy223/jd
Almost positive white PR doesn't get a boost...Jpreece59 wrote:Here's a 171/3.98 URM who got WL at HLS, CLS, and NYU:
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Allyn/jd
Topic for another thread but I think Berkeley doesn't get enough credit for being holistic. The most holistic school out there (yes, more that Y or S IMO).BerkeleyBear wrote: It's like Berkeley enjoys being unpredictable and random. That URM has such a nice GPA and LSAT combo.
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Could we may chalk this up as someone said something stupid on the internet and move on before the thread gets hijacked?bjsesq wrote:Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bizzybone1313
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:31 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
There is a guy on TLS who has like a 3.9 and three LSAT scores (155ish, 165ish and a 176ish). This guy came to TLS to ask for advice as to his chances at YHS. It would be nice for him to come back and tell everyone what happened with his cycle. It might very well be true that most of the T-14 doesn't care about retakes, but this might not necessarily be the case with YHS. If someone has used TLS and LSN to benefit themselves, wouldn't it be nice for them to return the favor for future applicants?
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Not really sure what the point of the thread is, other than torturing yourself, but fine. I'll let it go.wert3813 wrote:Could we may chalk this up as someone said something stupid on the internet and move on before the thread gets hijacked?bjsesq wrote:Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
Yes it would. Moving on...Please?bizzybone1313 wrote:There is a guy on TLS who has like a 3.9 and three LSAT scores (155ish, 165ish and a 176ish). This guy came to TLS to ask for advice as to his chances at YHS. It would be nice for him to come back and tell everyone what happened with his cycle. It might very well be true that most of the T-14 doesn't care about retakes, but this might not necessarily be the case with YHS. If someone has used TLS and LSN to benefit themselves, wouldn't it be nice for them to return the favor for future applicants?
- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Worst Cycles Ever
On a website where people make posts about the C&F issues of getting fired from work for masturbating in a broom closet I feel like this is a fairly useful thread.bjsesq wrote:Not really sure what the point of the thread is, other than torturing yourself, but fine. I'll let it go.wert3813 wrote:Could we may chalk this up as someone said something stupid on the internet and move on before the thread gets hijacked?bjsesq wrote:Bai was a poster here and helped a lot of people out. She wasn't a douche. Search her info before you start making broad proclamations about what sort of person she is.bizzybone1313 wrote:All I am saying is that these people benefitted tremendously from the information gathered on LSN, and they could have returned the favor. I am not happy at their misfortunes. I feel real bad for them actually. They worked very hard for those numbers and didn't get what would normally be considered reasonable.
I for one would like to get an idea of what the floor is for various numbers.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login