schools' mean LSAT

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
conch republic
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:31 pm

Postby conch republic » Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:17 pm

...
Last edited by conch republic on Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

USCtrojan86
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:36 pm

Postby USCtrojan86 » Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:20 pm

SoCal is definitely 157, I just double checked on my LSAC sheet.

Assuming the other 155 is correct, that must be South Carolina (although that strikes me as high)

User avatar
conch republic
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:31 pm

Postby conch republic » Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:32 pm

...
Last edited by conch republic on Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

USCtrojan86
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:36 pm

Postby USCtrojan86 » Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:36 pm

np. good idea for a thread.

also, out of curiosity:

Claremont McKenna 161
Georgetown 161
Claremont Mckenna 162


what?

User avatar
conch republic
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:31 pm

Postby conch republic » Wed Dec 26, 2007 7:02 pm

...
Last edited by conch republic on Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
nipplehead
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:58 pm

Postby nipplehead » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:26 pm

i go to CMC, and my LSAC report says 162

zeezoo
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:58 pm

Postby zeezoo » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:28 pm

won't you get varying numbers depending on which year each person graduated?

USCtrojan86
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 8:36 pm

Postby USCtrojan86 » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:51 pm

good point. I would assume that most people are probably graduating this year, but that might not be a good assumption to make.

perhaps we should all include year of graduation in our posts.

(2008 here)

zeezoo
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 7:58 pm

Postby zeezoo » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:55 pm

I don't think it really matters, I doubt it varies much year to year, just wanted to point out that's why the OP might receive conflicting results. I doubt anyone is lying.

User avatar
conch republic
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:31 pm

Postby conch republic » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:59 pm

...
Last edited by conch republic on Sun Apr 08, 2012 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

gspank69
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:23 am

Postby gspank69 » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:02 pm

Hey Nipplehead,

I checked mine and it does say 161 (class of 2005), so there must be a difference. Looks like you youngsters at CMC are getting smarter.

gspank69
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:23 am

Postby gspank69 » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:03 pm

CMC - Claremont McKenna College

User avatar
nipplehead
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:58 pm

Postby nipplehead » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:25 pm

Hey Nipplehead,

I checked mine and it does say 161 (class of 2005), so there must be a difference. Looks like you youngsters at CMC are getting smarter.


heh, i doubt that.......but yeah, as i'm graduating this year ('08), that three year difference must be the reason for the differing scores.

Nike6075
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:02 pm

Postby Nike6075 » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:26 pm

W&L : 161.

Beats both UVA and W&M...

un3r3stimat3d
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:47 pm

Postby un3r3stimat3d » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:33 pm

W&L : 161.

Beats both UVA and W&M...


small school advantage as to why wl>wm>uva?

Nike6075
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:02 pm

Postby Nike6075 » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:33 pm

I'd say better-student advantage...

EDIT: Obviously, I'm biased. But I do think that W&L is better even than people give it credit for. It would be a top 10 lib arts if it's peer reputation scores were better (which, for u-grad, doesn't mean too much...)
Last edited by Nike6075 on Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

un3r3stimat3d
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:47 pm

Postby un3r3stimat3d » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:39 pm

161 is probably statistically different from 158, but I doubt 161 is from 160, or that 160 is from 158. I think generally the student bodies at UVA + WM are a (small) step up from W&L, at least when I was looking at schools in 03-04.

un3r3stimat3d
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:47 pm

Postby un3r3stimat3d » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:42 pm

yeah i just looked up its peer score and you're right, it does hold it down. but it looks like wm is held down by its peer score, too, in a more competitive category. both pale to Dartmouth though :)

Nike6075
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:02 pm

Postby Nike6075 » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:46 pm

This is pretty blatant trolling, but here goes:

Current Princeton Review #s:

W&L:
PR Admission Selectivity Ranking: 98
Reading Middle 50% SAT: 660-730
Math Middle 50% SAT: 650-730

W&M:
PR Admission Selectivity Ranking: 93
Reading Middle 50% SAT: 620-730
Math Middle 50% SAT: 620-710

UVA:
PR Admission Selectivity Ranking: 97
Reading Middle 50% SAT: 600-710
Math Middle 50% SAT: 620-720

reverie
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:24 am

Postby reverie » Fri Dec 28, 2007 4:06 pm

[deleted school info]
Last edited by reverie on Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Ipso_Facto
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:16 am

Postby Ipso_Facto » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:32 am

Marquette: 151

Touro: 153

Trez
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 9:11 pm

Postby Trez » Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:25 am

This is pretty blatant trolling, but here goes:

Current Princeton Review #s:

W&L:
PR Admission Selectivity Ranking: 98
Reading Middle 50% SAT: 660-730
Math Middle 50% SAT: 650-730

W&M:
PR Admission Selectivity Ranking: 93
Reading Middle 50% SAT: 620-730
Math Middle 50% SAT: 620-710

UVA:
PR Admission Selectivity Ranking: 97
Reading Middle 50% SAT: 600-710
Math Middle 50% SAT: 620-720




Thats all well and good until you graduate and graduate and realize that UVA's name shits on W&L and W&M's names.

User avatar
spanktheduck
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:23 am

Postby spanktheduck » Mon Dec 31, 2007 4:31 am

UConn's is at 152.

Hitachi
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:38 pm

Postby Hitachi » Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:36 pm

Any other 164s? Amherst, Swarthmore, Williams, Stanford, Princeton?

un3r3stimat3d
Posts: 21
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:47 pm

Postby un3r3stimat3d » Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:54 pm

PR for some reason killed on WM that year, normally its the same as UVA for admissions and is generally regarded as harder to get into based on SAT scores and acceptance rate.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], caitlinrw and 3 guests