Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
frenchradar
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 10:46 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby frenchradar » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:14 pm

This is very interesting indeed. Thank you for sharing this info with us!
Hell. This actually makes me reconsider my own decision to attend law school
I want to practice law and all, but it seems like increasing number of “smart” people are thinking that going to law school is financially (I am guessing) bad decision based on past stats and such... I do think their decision to not attend law school is at least “rational”… In fact, the employment stats and stuff that I heard from recent law school graduates (including kids from t14) are really horrible. It is hard to give up things that I have done until this point, but I guess I was too naïve like many others.. Thank you!!
Last edited by frenchradar on Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
PARTY
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby PARTY » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:33 pm

TIKITEMBO wrote:I'm a OL


Wtf is a "OL"???

User avatar
minnbills
Posts: 3153
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby minnbills » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:35 pm

PARTY wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:I'm a OL


Wtf is a "OL"???


Don't be persnickety

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby dingbat » Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:39 pm

PARTY wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:I'm a OL


Wtf is a "OL"???

It's an OWL who cant spell very well. Keeps going around asking "Ho?"

User avatar
TIKITEMBO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby TIKITEMBO » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:09 pm

.
Last edited by TIKITEMBO on Thu Sep 20, 2012 1:01 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
PARTY
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby PARTY » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:12 pm

Thank you, dingbat, for taking that bullet for me.

User avatar
TIKITEMBO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby TIKITEMBO » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:14 pm

PARTY wrote:Thank you, dingbat, for taking that bullet for me.



Just realized it before you posted. OWLs can't read either. Okay, PARTY gets the haterade instead. Haterade for ALL!

User avatar
PARTY
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:54 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby PARTY » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:18 pm

TIKITEMBO wrote:
PARTY wrote:Thank you, dingbat, for taking that bullet for me.



Just realized it before you posted. OWLs can't read either. Okay, PARTY gets the haterade instead. Haterade for ALL!


Oh, tiki, so you know...

It's "0L", and it's supposed to fall in line with the "1L", "2L", and "3L" method of classification.

Clever, amirite?

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby dingbat » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:19 pm

PARTY wrote:Thank you, dingbat, for taking that bullet for me.
Bats and owls are natural competitors, so I had to give it a shot

User avatar
TIKITEMBO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby TIKITEMBO » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:30 pm

PARTY wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:
PARTY wrote:Thank you, dingbat, for taking that bullet for me.



Just realized it before you posted. OWLs can't read either. Okay, PARTY gets the haterade instead. Haterade for ALL!


Oh, tiki, so you know...

It's "0L", and it's supposed to fall in line with the "1L", "2L", and "3L" method of classification.

Clever, amirite?


What the hell is amirite? :wink: Okay PARTY, I'm forever grateful.

And dingbat, don't be jealous of the feathers.

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby dingbat » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:33 pm

TIKITEMBO wrote:
PARTY wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:
PARTY wrote:Thank you, dingbat, for taking that bullet for me.



Just realized it before you posted. OWLs can't read either. Okay, PARTY gets the haterade instead. Haterade for ALL!


Oh, tiki, so you know...

It's "0L", and it's supposed to fall in line with the "1L", "2L", and "3L" method of classification.

Clever, amirite?


What the hell is amirite? :wink: Okay PARTY, I'm forever grateful.

And dingbat, don't be jealous of the feathers.

Hey, at least they don't get to hang out in a dark dank cave

User avatar
TIKITEMBO
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: Fewer Quality Law School Applicants in 2012

Postby TIKITEMBO » Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:39 pm

Hey, at least they don't get to hang out in a dark dank cave


DAAAMN right.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], BobBoblaw, chargers21, echonov, jjcorvino, lnsjr1, Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests