Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
I noticed the LSAT/GPA ratio on law school predictor just yesterday and realized that is why at one school I am "better" than 56% of applicants whereas at another I am better than about two-thirds, even though the latter has a median LSAT score that is four points higher. For the former my LSAT is only one point below 25th percentile but the ratio is like 4. or something ridiculous. Now, surely this can't mean that LSAT scores are four times more important than GPA? I knew this system was corrupt and blatantly stupid and unfair but four times more important? That's scandalous. So am I right about this or am I misinterpreting the ratio?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:53 am
Posts: 1122
Umm. You say in your post that it varies by school. So I guess you already know the answer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Posts: 1425
/


Last edited by hoos89 on Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
hoos89 wrote:
I'm not sure it's quite correct to call the LSAT 4 times more important. I think you are misinterpreting the ratio.

For example a formula of LSAT + 11.25 * GPA is considered to be a ratio of 4x because the total LSAT possible is 180 and a 4.0 GPA would be worth 45. 180/45 = 4. However, you have to consider that everyone has at least 120 points on the LSAT, so there are only really 60 possible points for the LSAT compared to 45 for GPA.

Ratio's are just a good guide to see who values the LSAT higher or lower.


Can you explain this more? I don't get it and I want to understand this ratio nonsense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Posts: 1425
/


Last edited by hoos89 on Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Posts: 1483
This highly depends on the law school and on one's GPA range. In general, however, the LSAT tends to be more valuable than GPA.
http://www.uiowa.edu/~030116/prelaw/lawschools09.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
KevinP wrote:
This highly depends on the law school and on one's GPA range. In general, however, the LSAT tends to be more valuable than GPA.
http://www.uiowa.edu/~030116/prelaw/lawschools09.htm


Right. And this absolutely makes sense. A 140 minute multiple choice exam that has nothing to do with law should be worth more than four years of undergraduate studies including, in addition to many multiple choice tests, essay exams, essays, research papers, lecture attendance, presentations, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Posts: 1425
/


Last edited by hoos89 on Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 20801
Location: the rockabilly star from the days of old
I think it would be most fair if schools only evaluated applicants by LSAT score and just ignored GPA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
Tom Joad wrote:
I think it would be most fair if schools only evaluated applicants by LSAT score and just ignored GPA.


That's what is sad. Why even go to college? Just take the LSAT. That will predict law school performance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Posts: 1483
Why not go to the Massachusetts School of Law? They don't have an LSAT requirement.
http://www.mslaw.edu/Admissions_NoLSAT.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2011 7:13 pm
Posts: 11
These two numbers together are a better predictor of performance than when used separately.

http://www.lsac.org/jd/pdfs/LSAT-Score- ... rmance.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
KevinP wrote:
Why not go to the Massachusetts School of Law? They don't have an LSAT requirement.
http://www.mslaw.edu/Admissions_NoLSAT.htm


Two words: ABA accreditation. I should email them though and congratulate them on their courage. They are standing against evil and tyranny and all of those who choose to enable it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 10:33 am
Posts: 328
Philosopher King wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
I think it would be most fair if schools only evaluated applicants by LSAT score and just ignored GPA.


That's what is sad. Why even go to college? Just take the LSAT. That will predict law school performance.



Actually it will. I think it is more unfair to compare GPA's from hundreds of different schools than to compare scores on a test that actually involves many of the skills law students will be expected to have in law school.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
jrthor10 wrote:
Philosopher King wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
I think it would be most fair if schools only evaluated applicants by LSAT score and just ignored GPA.


That's what is sad. Why even go to college? Just take the LSAT. That will predict law school performance.



Actually it will. I think it is more unfair to compare GPA's from hundreds of different schools than to compare scores on a test that actually involves many of the skills law students will be expected to have in law school.


Two words: philosophy major


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Posts: 20801
Location: the rockabilly star from the days of old
Philosopher King wrote:
jrthor10 wrote:
Philosopher King wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
I think it would be most fair if schools only evaluated applicants by LSAT score and just ignored GPA.


That's what is sad. Why even go to college? Just take the LSAT. That will predict law school performance.



Actually it will. I think it is more unfair to compare GPA's from hundreds of different schools than to compare scores on a test that actually involves many of the skills law students will be expected to have in law school.


Two words: philosophy major

So maybe you have the skills to succeed in a graduate philosophy program. Law school isn't philosophy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
Tom Joad wrote:
So maybe you have the skills to succeed in a graduate philosophy program. Law school isn't philosophy.


Law falls almost entirety under the disciplines of philosophy and political science. Laws are enacted through the political process and are based on philosophical questions of morality. I could expand on this but just think about it for a moment.

My more important point is that my philosophy curriculum taught me the skills the LSAT tests for. I have detailed this countless times using specific courses to demonstrate how I have proven I have good logical reasoning and reading comprehension skills and my 155 LSAT is not representative of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Posts: 993
Anyone who is interested in how conversations about LSAT/GPA tradeoffs can play out in admissions offices should check out the investigation into former Illinois Dean of Admissions Paul Pless. The section that starts at the bottom of page 35 and continues on page 36 called "2. Fine Tuning and Optimizing LSAT and Median Combinations" is super interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Posts: 1425
/


Last edited by hoos89 on Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Posts: 963
Philosopher King wrote:
jrthor10 wrote:
Philosopher King wrote:
Tom Joad wrote:
I think it would be most fair if schools only evaluated applicants by LSAT score and just ignored GPA.


That's what is sad. Why even go to college? Just take the LSAT. That will predict law school performance.



Actually it will. I think it is more unfair to compare GPA's from hundreds of different schools than to compare scores on a test that actually involves many of the skills law students will be expected to have in law school.


Two words: philosophy major

Stop your kvetching. You don't deserve to get into law school.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:57 pm
Posts: 993
.


Last edited by Bumi on Sat Jan 28, 2012 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 8:56 pm
Posts: 1483
Bumi wrote:
Anyone who is interested in how conversations about LSAT/GPA tradeoffs can play out in admissions offices should check out the investigation into former Illinois Dean of Admissions Paul Pless. The section that starts at the bottom of page 35 and continues on page 36 called "2. Fine Tuning and Optimizing LSAT and Median Combinations" is super interesting.

As someone who is very interested in data, I thank you for the link.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:07 pm
Posts: 963
Mods, please ban this troll alread. thx.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 572
http://www.phil.ufl.edu/ugrad/whatis/LSATtable.html

Hey, if you major in Philosophy but your score is 155. It sadly means you are not really special snowflakes at all... :cry:

The Average LSAT scores by philosophy and religion is 157.4!

Hope you nail the LSAT and get the score you want~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LSAT/GPA ratio
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:25 pm
Posts: 499
hoos89 wrote:
As a philosophy major shouldn't you have the logical base to allow you to perform well on the LSAT?

Why is GPA any better of a measure? Because you should damn all of the talented and intelligent people who had bad semesters in college?

Did you honestly just refer to the LSAT as "evil and tyranny?" How is that any worse than judging people on 3-4 years of their life that are completely set and unchangeable? Not to mention that if you take the LSAT away, there really would be incentive for people to just go to worse schools to be a big fish in a small pond.


I suck at standardized tests. I never took the SAT or the ACT and did just fine in college. Having Asperger's doesn't help. The LSAT is too rigid. I think about things differently than other people do so no standardized test will really work well for me. The best way to describe it would be to say I see the world through a different paradigm than "regular" people.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CardinalAmbition, Clearly, eriedoctrine, frances315, ironrenegade21, Meow Meowsworth, tjmaciv and 30 guests



Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     TLS home     TLS forums     TLS wiki     Terms of Service     Privacy Policy     Copyright Policy     Contact     powered by phpBB