Is 30 schools too many to apply to? Forum
- BeerMaker
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:01 am
Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I put together my list and I narrowed it down to 30. Is that insane or fairly normal?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
stats, schools and preferred location?BeerMaker wrote:I put together my list and I narrowed it down to 30. Is that insane or fairly normal?
- DocHawkeye
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 11:22 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
Isn't that somewhere close to 15% of all accredited law schools in the United States?
- Kilpatrick
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:06 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
If you have a fee waiver, its not that crazy. I had a fee waiver so I applied to 20+. In retrospect though, I wasted money on some schools I definitely wouldn't have gone to just because I was paranoid about not getting in anywhere better and some I had no realistic shot at. If you don't have a fee waiver and you're actually spending ~100 bucks on each school - yes it's insane.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
It's on the high side.
If you have fee waivers or something that gives you a lot of reaches then it might be okay (e.g. being a 2.95/170, having 2 DUI's, etc).
If you have fee waivers or something that gives you a lot of reaches then it might be okay (e.g. being a 2.95/170, having 2 DUI's, etc).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 7:30 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
that's a bit high IMO. I'm applying to 13. Good luck either way!
- FeelTheHeat
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
Pretty much thisKilpatrick wrote:If you have a fee waiver, its not that crazy. I had a fee waiver so I applied to 20+. In retrospect though, I wasted money on some schools I definitely wouldn't have gone to just because I was paranoid about not getting in anywhere better and some I had no realistic shot at. If you don't have a fee waiver and you're actually spending ~100 bucks on each school - yes it's insane.
- 20160810
- Posts: 18121
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
Even with fee waivers this is stupid, as you're still spending $12 x 30. Only apply to schools you'd actually attend.
- PDaddy
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I can think of a consideration which makes it reasonable to apply to as many schools as you can: $cholarships!
It's not that crazy because the x-factor is that you can predict neither where you will get money nor how much will be offered. Applying only to schools that you would attend removes from the calculus schools that might offer you money that you could then use as leverage against more desirable peer schools that offer you less money or none at all.
For example, let's say you got into UCLA and USC, but USC offered you $30K/yr while UCLA offered you $15K/yr. Let's also say that you strongly preferred UCLA. This would present a scenario in which you could use USC's offer to get more money from UCLA. Schools know about this game and play it all the time, and they do not like to lose to peer schools.
Defining "peer" by rankings and other factors such as geography, specialties, etc, you could theoretically do this with Pepperdine and Loyola (CA), Virginia and Penn, Duke and Vanderbilt, Hastings and Davis, Michigan and Chicago, Suffolk and Howard, Brooklyn and Cardozo, Cornell and GULC, Illinois and Fordham, etc.
Apply to as many schools as you can afford to apply to, but maintain the quality of your applications. If you are paying out-of-pocket for apps and/or the quality of your apps is suffering, it's a bad idea to apply to a lot of schools. Otherwise, 30 apps is not that crazy.
It's not that crazy because the x-factor is that you can predict neither where you will get money nor how much will be offered. Applying only to schools that you would attend removes from the calculus schools that might offer you money that you could then use as leverage against more desirable peer schools that offer you less money or none at all.
For example, let's say you got into UCLA and USC, but USC offered you $30K/yr while UCLA offered you $15K/yr. Let's also say that you strongly preferred UCLA. This would present a scenario in which you could use USC's offer to get more money from UCLA. Schools know about this game and play it all the time, and they do not like to lose to peer schools.
Defining "peer" by rankings and other factors such as geography, specialties, etc, you could theoretically do this with Pepperdine and Loyola (CA), Virginia and Penn, Duke and Vanderbilt, Hastings and Davis, Michigan and Chicago, Suffolk and Howard, Brooklyn and Cardozo, Cornell and GULC, Illinois and Fordham, etc.
Apply to as many schools as you can afford to apply to, but maintain the quality of your applications. If you are paying out-of-pocket for apps and/or the quality of your apps is suffering, it's a bad idea to apply to a lot of schools. Otherwise, 30 apps is not that crazy.
-
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
Depends. I applied to 18 but got fee waivers for half of them. I probably wouldn't apply to 30 if you aren't getting a significant amount of fee waivers though. Plus, 30 just seems a little excessive regardless. But to each his own I guess. If money isn't a concern I don't see how applying to an assload of schools could hurt you.
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 11:25 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
Is this list credited? Specifically Duke/Vandy. I was saving my non-T14 apps for after I heard from Duke and now that I'm in I wasn't going to bother (even with fee waivers), but if Vanderbilt could offer some leverage...PDaddy wrote: Defining "peer" by rankings and other factors such as geography, specialties, etc, you could theoretically do this with Pepperdine and Loyola (CA), Virginia and Penn, Duke and Vanderbilt, Hastings and Davis, Michigan and Chicago, Suffolk and Howard, Brooklyn and Cardozo, Cornell and GULC, Illinois and Fordham, etc.
-
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:57 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I applied to nearly 30 schools, almost all with fee waivers, and actually ended up going to a school that I never thought I would actually attend. If you've got the money to do it, do it. You never know what might change between the time you apply and the time when you need to make a decision. In my case, I ended up going to school for free in a place where I've been very happy for the past three years.
Last edited by Aqualibrium on Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
Schools don't need to be exactly peer for you to leverage scholarships, they just need to be close enough. However if the school is lower you'll need more money to leverage. For example Duke probably wouldn't care about $5k/year scholarship to Vandy whereas they might care about $5k/year scholarship to UVa. But Duke might consider a $20k/year scholarship to Vandy (and give you something like $5k/year, hypothetically).ringo wrote:Is this list credited? Specifically Duke/Vandy. I was saving my non-T14 apps for after I heard from Duke and now that I'm in I wasn't going to bother (even with fee waivers), but if Vanderbilt could offer some leverage...PDaddy wrote: Defining "peer" by rankings and other factors such as geography, specialties, etc, you could theoretically do this with Pepperdine and Loyola (CA), Virginia and Penn, Duke and Vanderbilt, Hastings and Davis, Michigan and Chicago, Suffolk and Howard, Brooklyn and Cardozo, Cornell and GULC, Illinois and Fordham, etc.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:44 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I'm applying to 8 and that's only after several of my friends and advisors urged me to apply to more,
initially i was only going for 5 schools...im sure u guessed it, imho 30 is excessive...i dont see why the need for so many...
initially i was only going for 5 schools...im sure u guessed it, imho 30 is excessive...i dont see why the need for so many...
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I applied to around 25 schools. Rejected by 11, waitlisted by 11, accepted by 3.thederangedwang wrote:I'm applying to 8 and that's only after several of my friends and advisors urged me to apply to more,
initially i was only going for 5 schools...im sure u guessed it, imho 30 is excessive...i dont see why the need for so many...
You really can't make categorical statements like this when people with certain number combinations and/or softs are justified in applying to many schools due to the erratic nature that their cycle may take.
-
- Posts: 1115
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:44 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
i agree with you for the most part, but those stats, 11 reject, 11 waitlist, and 3 accept, would to me indicate that you shot a bit high or you were overly optimistic by a bit.bk187 wrote:I applied to around 25 schools. Rejected by 11, waitlisted by 11, accepted by 3.thederangedwang wrote:I'm applying to 8 and that's only after several of my friends and advisors urged me to apply to more,
initially i was only going for 5 schools...im sure u guessed it, imho 30 is excessive...i dont see why the need for so many...
You really can't make categorical statements like this when people with certain number combinations and/or softs are justified in applying to many schools due to the erratic nature that their cycle may take.
i think 15 schools is good, with 20 being really really high...i think 30 is plain and simply excessive...if the op is realistic with his chances, then 30 is excessive
-
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:06 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
What the hell is wrong with shooting too high? I don't get people that are super conservative with their applications. It can never hurt you to apply broadly (assuming you don't have money issues). I was admitted to a school I thought I had no chance of getting into and it worked out well. If I never would have applied there, I obviously never would have gotten in. There is really no hard and fast rule here.thederangedwang wrote:i agree with you for the most part, but those stats, 11 reject, 11 waitlist, and 3 accept, would to me indicate that you shot a bit high or you were overly optimistic by a bit.bk187 wrote:I applied to around 25 schools. Rejected by 11, waitlisted by 11, accepted by 3.thederangedwang wrote:I'm applying to 8 and that's only after several of my friends and advisors urged me to apply to more,
initially i was only going for 5 schools...im sure u guessed it, imho 30 is excessive...i dont see why the need for so many...
You really can't make categorical statements like this when people with certain number combinations and/or softs are justified in applying to many schools due to the erratic nature that their cycle may take.
i think 15 schools is good, with 20 being really really high...i think 30 is plain and simply excessive...if the op is realistic with his chances, then 30 is excessive
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- smokeylarue
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I think 30 is way too many.
- BeerMaker
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:01 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I think I'll try and narrow it down to 20. I don't know where I want to go. I am very indecisive. This is not going to be good
- tryingtowin
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:28 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I applied to 80,
waitlisted by 50, rejected by 29 and excepted to 1..
The more applications the better!!
waitlisted by 50, rejected by 29 and excepted to 1..
The more applications the better!!
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
FTFYSBL wrote:Even with fee waivers this is stupid, as you're still spending$12$16 x 30. Only apply to schools you'd actually attend.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kilpatrick
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:06 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
I think I see what the problem was.tryingtowin wrote:I applied to 80,
waitlisted by 50, rejected by 29 and excepted to 1..
The more applications the better!!
- thelawschoolproject
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:58 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
Thought this . . . just didn't have the balls to say it. +1 to you.Kilpatrick wrote:I think I see what the problem was.tryingtowin wrote:I applied to 80,
waitlisted by 50, rejected by 29 and excepted to 1..
The more applications the better!!
- tryingtowin
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:28 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
laughing hard!Kilpatrick wrote:I think I see what the problem was.tryingtowin wrote:I applied to 80,
waitlisted by 50, rejected by 29 and excepted to 1..
The more applications the better!!
Laughing harder at those who took my post seriously
and laughing hardest at those who thought it was an accident.
- BeerMaker
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:01 am
Re: Is 30 schools too many to apply to?
HAHAHAHA...... I'm rolling! I wonder what the record is for person denied by the most schools.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login